Cargando…

Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To characterize mass and density changes of lung parenchyma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following midtreatment resolution of atelectasis and to quantify the impact this large geometric change has on normal tissue dose. METHODS: Baseline and midtreatment CT images and cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guy, Christopher L., Weiss, Elisabeth, Jan, Nuzhat, Reshko, Leonid B., Christensen, Gary E., Hugo, Geoffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27806593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4965807
_version_ 1782463656628322304
author Guy, Christopher L.
Weiss, Elisabeth
Jan, Nuzhat
Reshko, Leonid B.
Christensen, Gary E.
Hugo, Geoffrey D.
author_facet Guy, Christopher L.
Weiss, Elisabeth
Jan, Nuzhat
Reshko, Leonid B.
Christensen, Gary E.
Hugo, Geoffrey D.
author_sort Guy, Christopher L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize mass and density changes of lung parenchyma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following midtreatment resolution of atelectasis and to quantify the impact this large geometric change has on normal tissue dose. METHODS: Baseline and midtreatment CT images and contours were obtained for 18 NSCLC patients with atelectasis. Patients were classified based on atelectasis volume reduction between the two scans as having either full, partial, or no resolution. Relative mass and density changes from baseline to midtreatment were calculated based on voxel intensity and volume for each lung lobe. Patients also had clinical treatment plans available which were used to assess changes in normal tissue dose constraints from baseline to midtreatment. The midtreatment image was rigidly aligned with the baseline scan in two ways: (1) bony anatomy and (2) carina. Treatment parameters (beam apertures, weights, angles, monitor units, etc.) were transferred to each image. Then, dose was recalculated. Typical IMRT dose constraints were evaluated on all images, and the changes from baseline to each midtreatment image were investigated. RESULTS: Atelectatic lobes experienced mean (stdev) mass changes of −2.8% (36.6%), −24.4% (33.0%), and −9.2% (17.5%) and density changes of −66.0% (6.4%), −25.6% (13.6%), and −17.0% (21.1%) for full, partial, and no resolution, respectively. Means (stdev) of dose changes to spinal cord D(max), esophagus D(mean), and lungs D(mean) were 0.67 (2.99), 0.99 (2.69), and 0.50 Gy (2.05 Gy), respectively, for bone alignment and 0.14 (1.80), 0.77 (2.95), and 0.06 Gy (1.71 Gy) for carina alignment. Dose increases with bone alignment up to 10.93, 7.92, and 5.69 Gy were found for maximum spinal cord, mean esophagus, and mean lung doses, respectively, with carina alignment yielding similar values. 44% and 22% of patients had at least one metric change by at least 5 Gy (dose metrics) or 5% (volume metrics) for bone and carina alignments, respectively. Investigation of GTV coverage showed mean (stdev) changes in V(Rx), D(max), and D(min) of −5.5% (13.5%), 2.5% (4.2%), and 0.8% (8.9%), respectively, for bone alignment with similar results for carina alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of atelectasis caused mass and density decreases, on average, and introduced substantial changes in normal tissue dose metrics in a subset of the patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5085974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Association of Physicists in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50859742016-11-07 Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy Guy, Christopher L. Weiss, Elisabeth Jan, Nuzhat Reshko, Leonid B. Christensen, Gary E. Hugo, Geoffrey D. Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: To characterize mass and density changes of lung parenchyma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following midtreatment resolution of atelectasis and to quantify the impact this large geometric change has on normal tissue dose. METHODS: Baseline and midtreatment CT images and contours were obtained for 18 NSCLC patients with atelectasis. Patients were classified based on atelectasis volume reduction between the two scans as having either full, partial, or no resolution. Relative mass and density changes from baseline to midtreatment were calculated based on voxel intensity and volume for each lung lobe. Patients also had clinical treatment plans available which were used to assess changes in normal tissue dose constraints from baseline to midtreatment. The midtreatment image was rigidly aligned with the baseline scan in two ways: (1) bony anatomy and (2) carina. Treatment parameters (beam apertures, weights, angles, monitor units, etc.) were transferred to each image. Then, dose was recalculated. Typical IMRT dose constraints were evaluated on all images, and the changes from baseline to each midtreatment image were investigated. RESULTS: Atelectatic lobes experienced mean (stdev) mass changes of −2.8% (36.6%), −24.4% (33.0%), and −9.2% (17.5%) and density changes of −66.0% (6.4%), −25.6% (13.6%), and −17.0% (21.1%) for full, partial, and no resolution, respectively. Means (stdev) of dose changes to spinal cord D(max), esophagus D(mean), and lungs D(mean) were 0.67 (2.99), 0.99 (2.69), and 0.50 Gy (2.05 Gy), respectively, for bone alignment and 0.14 (1.80), 0.77 (2.95), and 0.06 Gy (1.71 Gy) for carina alignment. Dose increases with bone alignment up to 10.93, 7.92, and 5.69 Gy were found for maximum spinal cord, mean esophagus, and mean lung doses, respectively, with carina alignment yielding similar values. 44% and 22% of patients had at least one metric change by at least 5 Gy (dose metrics) or 5% (volume metrics) for bone and carina alignments, respectively. Investigation of GTV coverage showed mean (stdev) changes in V(Rx), D(max), and D(min) of −5.5% (13.5%), 2.5% (4.2%), and 0.8% (8.9%), respectively, for bone alignment with similar results for carina alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of atelectasis caused mass and density decreases, on average, and introduced substantial changes in normal tissue dose metrics in a subset of the patient cohort. American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2016-11 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5085974/ /pubmed/27806593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4965807 Text en © 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 0094-2405/2016/43(11)/6109/9/$30.00 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Guy, Christopher L.
Weiss, Elisabeth
Jan, Nuzhat
Reshko, Leonid B.
Christensen, Gary E.
Hugo, Geoffrey D.
Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title_full Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title_fullStr Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title_short Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
title_sort effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy
topic QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27806593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4965807
work_keys_str_mv AT guychristopherl effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy
AT weisselisabeth effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy
AT jannuzhat effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy
AT reshkoleonidb effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy
AT christensengarye effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy
AT hugogeoffreyd effectofatelectasischangesontissuemassanddoseduringlungradiotherapy