Cargando…
Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performan...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5 |
_version_ | 1782463657106472960 |
---|---|
author | Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. Gathercole, Susan E. Allen, Richard J. Holmes, Joni |
author_facet | Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. Gathercole, Susan E. Allen, Richard J. Holmes, Joni |
author_sort | Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performance. In both experiments, recall was enhanced by carrying out the instructions as they were being initially presented and also by performing them at recall. In contrast, the accuracy of instruction-following did not improve above spoken presentation alone, either when the instructions were silently read or heard by the child (Experiment 1), or when the child repeated the spoken instructions as they were presented (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that the enactment advantage at presentation does not simply reflect a general benefit of a dual exposure to instructions, and that it is not a result of their self-production at presentation. The benefits of action-based recall were reduced following enactment during presentation, suggesting that the positive effects of action at encoding and recall may have a common origin. It is proposed that the benefits of physical movement arise from the existence of a short-term motor store that maintains the temporal, spatial, and motoric features of either planned or already executed actions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5085979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50859792016-11-14 Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. Gathercole, Susan E. Allen, Richard J. Holmes, Joni Mem Cognit Article Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performance. In both experiments, recall was enhanced by carrying out the instructions as they were being initially presented and also by performing them at recall. In contrast, the accuracy of instruction-following did not improve above spoken presentation alone, either when the instructions were silently read or heard by the child (Experiment 1), or when the child repeated the spoken instructions as they were presented (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that the enactment advantage at presentation does not simply reflect a general benefit of a dual exposure to instructions, and that it is not a result of their self-production at presentation. The benefits of action-based recall were reduced following enactment during presentation, suggesting that the positive effects of action at encoding and recall may have a common origin. It is proposed that the benefits of physical movement arise from the existence of a short-term motor store that maintains the temporal, spatial, and motoric features of either planned or already executed actions. Springer US 2016-07-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5085979/ /pubmed/27443320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. Gathercole, Susan E. Allen, Richard J. Holmes, Joni Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title | Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title_full | Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title_fullStr | Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title_full_unstemmed | Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title_short | Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? |
title_sort | following instructions from working memory: why does action at encoding and recall help? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaroslawskaagnieszkaj followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp AT gathercolesusane followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp AT allenrichardj followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp AT holmesjoni followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp |