Cargando…

Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?

Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J., Gathercole, Susan E., Allen, Richard J., Holmes, Joni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5
_version_ 1782463657106472960
author Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J.
Gathercole, Susan E.
Allen, Richard J.
Holmes, Joni
author_facet Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J.
Gathercole, Susan E.
Allen, Richard J.
Holmes, Joni
author_sort Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J.
collection PubMed
description Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performance. In both experiments, recall was enhanced by carrying out the instructions as they were being initially presented and also by performing them at recall. In contrast, the accuracy of instruction-following did not improve above spoken presentation alone, either when the instructions were silently read or heard by the child (Experiment 1), or when the child repeated the spoken instructions as they were presented (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that the enactment advantage at presentation does not simply reflect a general benefit of a dual exposure to instructions, and that it is not a result of their self-production at presentation. The benefits of action-based recall were reduced following enactment during presentation, suggesting that the positive effects of action at encoding and recall may have a common origin. It is proposed that the benefits of physical movement arise from the existence of a short-term motor store that maintains the temporal, spatial, and motoric features of either planned or already executed actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5085979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50859792016-11-14 Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J. Gathercole, Susan E. Allen, Richard J. Holmes, Joni Mem Cognit Article Two experiments investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow sequences of instructions. Children ages 7–9 years recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performance. In both experiments, recall was enhanced by carrying out the instructions as they were being initially presented and also by performing them at recall. In contrast, the accuracy of instruction-following did not improve above spoken presentation alone, either when the instructions were silently read or heard by the child (Experiment 1), or when the child repeated the spoken instructions as they were presented (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that the enactment advantage at presentation does not simply reflect a general benefit of a dual exposure to instructions, and that it is not a result of their self-production at presentation. The benefits of action-based recall were reduced following enactment during presentation, suggesting that the positive effects of action at encoding and recall may have a common origin. It is proposed that the benefits of physical movement arise from the existence of a short-term motor store that maintains the temporal, spatial, and motoric features of either planned or already executed actions. Springer US 2016-07-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5085979/ /pubmed/27443320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J.
Gathercole, Susan E.
Allen, Richard J.
Holmes, Joni
Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title_full Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title_fullStr Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title_full_unstemmed Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title_short Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help?
title_sort following instructions from working memory: why does action at encoding and recall help?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0636-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jaroslawskaagnieszkaj followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp
AT gathercolesusane followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp
AT allenrichardj followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp
AT holmesjoni followinginstructionsfromworkingmemorywhydoesactionatencodingandrecallhelp