Cargando…

Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory

Working memory research often focuses on measuring the capacity of the system and how it relates to other cognitive abilities. However, research into the structure of working memory is less concerned with an overall capacity measure but rather with the intricacies of underlying components and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doherty, Jason M., Logie, Robert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0626-7
_version_ 1782463658158194688
author Doherty, Jason M.
Logie, Robert H.
author_facet Doherty, Jason M.
Logie, Robert H.
author_sort Doherty, Jason M.
collection PubMed
description Working memory research often focuses on measuring the capacity of the system and how it relates to other cognitive abilities. However, research into the structure of working memory is less concerned with an overall capacity measure but rather with the intricacies of underlying components and their contribution to different tasks. A number of models of working memory structure have been proposed, each with different assumptions and predictions, but none of which adequately accounts for the full range of data in the working memory literature. We report 2 experiments that investigated the effects of load manipulations on dual-task verbal temporary memory and spatial processing. Crucially, we manipulated cognitive load around the measured memory span of each individual participant. We report a clear effect of increasing memory load on processing accuracy, but only when memory load is increased above each participant’s measured memory span. However, increasing processing load did not affect memory performance. We argue that immediate verbal memory may rely both on a temporary phonological store and on activated traces in long-term memory, with the latter deployed to support memory performance for supraspan lists and when a high memory load is coupled with a processing task. We propose that future research should tailor the load manipulations to the capacities of individual participants and suggest that contrasts between models of working memory may be more apparent than real.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5085983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50859832016-11-14 Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory Doherty, Jason M. Logie, Robert H. Mem Cognit Article Working memory research often focuses on measuring the capacity of the system and how it relates to other cognitive abilities. However, research into the structure of working memory is less concerned with an overall capacity measure but rather with the intricacies of underlying components and their contribution to different tasks. A number of models of working memory structure have been proposed, each with different assumptions and predictions, but none of which adequately accounts for the full range of data in the working memory literature. We report 2 experiments that investigated the effects of load manipulations on dual-task verbal temporary memory and spatial processing. Crucially, we manipulated cognitive load around the measured memory span of each individual participant. We report a clear effect of increasing memory load on processing accuracy, but only when memory load is increased above each participant’s measured memory span. However, increasing processing load did not affect memory performance. We argue that immediate verbal memory may rely both on a temporary phonological store and on activated traces in long-term memory, with the latter deployed to support memory performance for supraspan lists and when a high memory load is coupled with a processing task. We propose that future research should tailor the load manipulations to the capacities of individual participants and suggest that contrasts between models of working memory may be more apparent than real. Springer US 2016-06-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5085983/ /pubmed/27287373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0626-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Doherty, Jason M.
Logie, Robert H.
Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title_full Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title_fullStr Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title_full_unstemmed Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title_short Resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
title_sort resource-sharing in multiple-component working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0626-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dohertyjasonm resourcesharinginmultiplecomponentworkingmemory
AT logieroberth resourcesharinginmultiplecomponentworkingmemory