Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study

AIM: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements (GICs) to dentin of primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample size taken for the study was 72 deciduous molars with intact buccal or lingual surfaces. Samples were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., groups A,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somani, Rani, Jaidka, Shipra, Singh, Deepti J, Sibal, Gurleen K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843248
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1362
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements (GICs) to dentin of primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample size taken for the study was 72 deciduous molars with intact buccal or lingual surfaces. Samples were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., groups A, B, and C and were restored with conventional type II GIC, type II light cure (LC) GIC, and type IX GIC respectively. Thermocycling was done to simulate oral conditions. After 24 hours, shear bond strength was determined using Instron Universal testing Machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/ minute until fracture. Results were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: It was found that the shear bond strength was highest in group B (LC GIC) 9.851 ± 1.620 MPa, followed by group C (type IX GIC) 7.226 ± 0.877 MPa, and was lowest in group A (conventional GIC) 4.931 ± 0.9735 MPa. CONCLUSION: Light cure GIC was significantly better than type IX GIC and conventional GIC in terms of shear bond strength. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(3):192-196.