Cargando…

Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Obesity, physical inactivity and poor diet quality have been associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality as well as treatment-related side-effects in breast cancer survivors. Weight loss intervention trials in breast cancer survivors have shown that w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reeves, Marina M., Terranova, Caroline O., Erickson, Jane M., Job, Jennifer R., Brookes, Denise S. K., McCarthy, Nicole, Hickman, Ingrid J., Lawler, Sheleigh P., Fjeldsoe, Brianna S., Healy, Genevieve N., Winkler, Elisabeth A. H., Janda, Monika, Veerman, J. Lennert, Ware, Robert S., Prins, Johannes B., Vos, Theo, Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy, Eakin, Elizabeth G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2858-0
_version_ 1782463678062264320
author Reeves, Marina M.
Terranova, Caroline O.
Erickson, Jane M.
Job, Jennifer R.
Brookes, Denise S. K.
McCarthy, Nicole
Hickman, Ingrid J.
Lawler, Sheleigh P.
Fjeldsoe, Brianna S.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Winkler, Elisabeth A. H.
Janda, Monika
Veerman, J. Lennert
Ware, Robert S.
Prins, Johannes B.
Vos, Theo
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Eakin, Elizabeth G.
author_facet Reeves, Marina M.
Terranova, Caroline O.
Erickson, Jane M.
Job, Jennifer R.
Brookes, Denise S. K.
McCarthy, Nicole
Hickman, Ingrid J.
Lawler, Sheleigh P.
Fjeldsoe, Brianna S.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Winkler, Elisabeth A. H.
Janda, Monika
Veerman, J. Lennert
Ware, Robert S.
Prins, Johannes B.
Vos, Theo
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Eakin, Elizabeth G.
author_sort Reeves, Marina M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity, physical inactivity and poor diet quality have been associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality as well as treatment-related side-effects in breast cancer survivors. Weight loss intervention trials in breast cancer survivors have shown that weight loss is safe and achievable; however, few studies have examined the benefits of such interventions on a broad range of outcomes and few have examined factors important to translation (e.g. feasible delivery method for scaling up, assessment of sustained changes, cost-effectiveness). The Living Well after Breast Cancer randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate a 12-month telephone-delivered weight loss intervention (versus usual care) on weight change and a range of secondary outcomes including cost-effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: Women (18–75 years; body mass index 25–45 kg/m(2)) diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in the previous 2 years are recruited from public and private hospitals and through the state-based cancer registry (target n = 156). Following baseline assessment, participants are randomized 1:1 to either a 12-month telephone-delivered weight loss intervention (targeting diet and physical activity) or usual care. Data are collected at baseline, 6-months (mid-intervention), 12-months (end-of-intervention) and 18-months (maintenance). The primary outcome is change in weight at 12-months. Secondary outcomes are changes in body composition, bone mineral density, cardio-metabolic and cancer-related biomarkers, metabolic health and chronic disease risk, physical function, patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, menopausal symptoms, body image, fear of cancer recurrence) and behaviors (dietary intake, physical activity, sitting time). Data collected at 18-months will be used to assess whether outcomes achieved at end-of-intervention are sustained six months after intervention completion. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed, as will mediators and moderators of intervention effects. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence needed to inform the wide-scale provision of weight loss, physical activity and dietary interventions as part of routine survivorship care for breast cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12612000997853 (Registered 18 September 2012). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2858-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5086071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50860712016-11-02 Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer Reeves, Marina M. Terranova, Caroline O. Erickson, Jane M. Job, Jennifer R. Brookes, Denise S. K. McCarthy, Nicole Hickman, Ingrid J. Lawler, Sheleigh P. Fjeldsoe, Brianna S. Healy, Genevieve N. Winkler, Elisabeth A. H. Janda, Monika Veerman, J. Lennert Ware, Robert S. Prins, Johannes B. Vos, Theo Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy Eakin, Elizabeth G. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Obesity, physical inactivity and poor diet quality have been associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality as well as treatment-related side-effects in breast cancer survivors. Weight loss intervention trials in breast cancer survivors have shown that weight loss is safe and achievable; however, few studies have examined the benefits of such interventions on a broad range of outcomes and few have examined factors important to translation (e.g. feasible delivery method for scaling up, assessment of sustained changes, cost-effectiveness). The Living Well after Breast Cancer randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate a 12-month telephone-delivered weight loss intervention (versus usual care) on weight change and a range of secondary outcomes including cost-effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: Women (18–75 years; body mass index 25–45 kg/m(2)) diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in the previous 2 years are recruited from public and private hospitals and through the state-based cancer registry (target n = 156). Following baseline assessment, participants are randomized 1:1 to either a 12-month telephone-delivered weight loss intervention (targeting diet and physical activity) or usual care. Data are collected at baseline, 6-months (mid-intervention), 12-months (end-of-intervention) and 18-months (maintenance). The primary outcome is change in weight at 12-months. Secondary outcomes are changes in body composition, bone mineral density, cardio-metabolic and cancer-related biomarkers, metabolic health and chronic disease risk, physical function, patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, menopausal symptoms, body image, fear of cancer recurrence) and behaviors (dietary intake, physical activity, sitting time). Data collected at 18-months will be used to assess whether outcomes achieved at end-of-intervention are sustained six months after intervention completion. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed, as will mediators and moderators of intervention effects. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence needed to inform the wide-scale provision of weight loss, physical activity and dietary interventions as part of routine survivorship care for breast cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12612000997853 (Registered 18 September 2012). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2858-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5086071/ /pubmed/27793125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2858-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Reeves, Marina M.
Terranova, Caroline O.
Erickson, Jane M.
Job, Jennifer R.
Brookes, Denise S. K.
McCarthy, Nicole
Hickman, Ingrid J.
Lawler, Sheleigh P.
Fjeldsoe, Brianna S.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Winkler, Elisabeth A. H.
Janda, Monika
Veerman, J. Lennert
Ware, Robert S.
Prins, Johannes B.
Vos, Theo
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Eakin, Elizabeth G.
Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title_full Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title_fullStr Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title_short Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
title_sort living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2858-0
work_keys_str_mv AT reevesmarinam livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT terranovacarolineo livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT ericksonjanem livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT jobjenniferr livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT brookesdenisesk livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT mccarthynicole livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT hickmaningridj livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT lawlersheleighp livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT fjeldsoebriannas livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT healygenevieven livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT winklerelisabethah livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT jandamonika livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT veermanjlennert livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT wareroberts livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT prinsjohannesb livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT vostheo livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT demarkwahnefriedwendy livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer
AT eakinelizabethg livingwellafterbreastcancerrandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocolevaluatingatelephonedeliveredweightlossinterventionversususualcareinwomenfollowingtreatmentforbreastcancer