Cargando…

Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a choice of surgical procedure for cervical degenerative diseases associated with radiculopathy or myelopathy. However, the patients undergoing ACDF still have problems. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the radiologic result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, O Ik, Son, Dong Wuk, Lee, Sang Weon, Song, Geun Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799985
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.91
_version_ 1782463741638475776
author Kwon, O Ik
Son, Dong Wuk
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
author_facet Kwon, O Ik
Son, Dong Wuk
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
author_sort Kwon, O Ik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a choice of surgical procedure for cervical degenerative diseases associated with radiculopathy or myelopathy. However, the patients undergoing ACDF still have problems. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the radiologic results of 3 different methods in single-level ACDF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective collection of radiological data from January 2011 to December 2014. A total of 67 patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups by operation procedure: using stand-alone cage (group cage, n=20); polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK)-titanium combined anchored cage (group AC, n=21); and anterior cervical cage-plate (group CP, n=26). Global cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb angle), fused segment height, fusion rate, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured and analyzed at serial preoperative, postoperative, 6-month, and final 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Successful bone fusion was achieved in all patients at the final follow-up examination; however, the loss of disc height over 3 mm at the surgical level was observed in 6 patients in group cage. Groups AC and CP yielded significantly better outcomes than group cage in fused segment height and cervical ROM(p=0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). Furthermore, group AC had similar radiologic outcomes to those of group CP. CONCLUSION: The PEEK-titanium combined anchored cage may be a good alternative procedure in terms of reducing complications induced by plate after ACDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5086475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50864752016-10-31 Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Kwon, O Ik Son, Dong Wuk Lee, Sang Weon Song, Geun Sung Korean J Spine Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a choice of surgical procedure for cervical degenerative diseases associated with radiculopathy or myelopathy. However, the patients undergoing ACDF still have problems. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the radiologic results of 3 different methods in single-level ACDF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective collection of radiological data from January 2011 to December 2014. A total of 67 patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups by operation procedure: using stand-alone cage (group cage, n=20); polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK)-titanium combined anchored cage (group AC, n=21); and anterior cervical cage-plate (group CP, n=26). Global cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb angle), fused segment height, fusion rate, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured and analyzed at serial preoperative, postoperative, 6-month, and final 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Successful bone fusion was achieved in all patients at the final follow-up examination; however, the loss of disc height over 3 mm at the surgical level was observed in 6 patients in group cage. Groups AC and CP yielded significantly better outcomes than group cage in fused segment height and cervical ROM(p=0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). Furthermore, group AC had similar radiologic outcomes to those of group CP. CONCLUSION: The PEEK-titanium combined anchored cage may be a good alternative procedure in terms of reducing complications induced by plate after ACDF. The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2016-09 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5086475/ /pubmed/27799985 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.91 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Kwon, O Ik
Son, Dong Wuk
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_full Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_short Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
title_sort comparison of radiologic outcomes of different methods in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799985
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.91
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonoik comparisonofradiologicoutcomesofdifferentmethodsinsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT sondongwuk comparisonofradiologicoutcomesofdifferentmethodsinsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT leesangweon comparisonofradiologicoutcomesofdifferentmethodsinsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT songgeunsung comparisonofradiologicoutcomesofdifferentmethodsinsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion