Cargando…

UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?

Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation covers the spectrum of wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. The potency and biological activity for a variety of endpoints differ by wavelength. For monitoring and communication purposes, different UV action spectra have been developed. These spectra use different weighting fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshammer, Hanns, Simic, Stana, Haluza, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101041
_version_ 1782463804253143040
author Moshammer, Hanns
Simic, Stana
Haluza, Daniela
author_facet Moshammer, Hanns
Simic, Stana
Haluza, Daniela
author_sort Moshammer, Hanns
collection PubMed
description Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation covers the spectrum of wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. The potency and biological activity for a variety of endpoints differ by wavelength. For monitoring and communication purposes, different UV action spectra have been developed. These spectra use different weighting functions. The action spectrum for erythemal dose is the most widely used one. This erythemal dose per time or dose-rate has been further simplified into a “UV index”. Following this example, in our review we use the term “index” or (plural) “indices” in a more general description for all simplified single-value measures for any biologically effective UV dose, e.g., for human non-melanoma skin cancer and for previtamin D production rate. Ongoing discussion about the existence of an increased melanoma risk due to UV-A exposure underscores the uncertainties inherent in current weighting functions. Thus, we performed an online literature search to review the data basis for these indices, to understand their relevance for an individual, and to assess the applicability of the indices for a range of exposure scenarios. Even for natural (solar) UV, the spectral composition varies spatially and temporally. Artificial UV sources and personal protection introduce further variation to the spectral composition. Many biological effects are proposed for UV radiation. Only few endpoints have been studied sufficiently to estimate a reliable index. Weighting functions for chronic effects and most importantly for cancer endpoints have been developed in animal models, and often for proxy endpoints only. Epidemiological studies on biological effects of UV radiation should not only depend on single-value weighted UV dose estimates (indexes) but should strive for a more detailed description of the individual exposure. A better understanding of the adverse and beneficial effects of UV radiation by wavelength would also improve medical counseling and health communication regarding individual health-supportive behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5086780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50867802016-11-02 UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate? Moshammer, Hanns Simic, Stana Haluza, Daniela Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation covers the spectrum of wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. The potency and biological activity for a variety of endpoints differ by wavelength. For monitoring and communication purposes, different UV action spectra have been developed. These spectra use different weighting functions. The action spectrum for erythemal dose is the most widely used one. This erythemal dose per time or dose-rate has been further simplified into a “UV index”. Following this example, in our review we use the term “index” or (plural) “indices” in a more general description for all simplified single-value measures for any biologically effective UV dose, e.g., for human non-melanoma skin cancer and for previtamin D production rate. Ongoing discussion about the existence of an increased melanoma risk due to UV-A exposure underscores the uncertainties inherent in current weighting functions. Thus, we performed an online literature search to review the data basis for these indices, to understand their relevance for an individual, and to assess the applicability of the indices for a range of exposure scenarios. Even for natural (solar) UV, the spectral composition varies spatially and temporally. Artificial UV sources and personal protection introduce further variation to the spectral composition. Many biological effects are proposed for UV radiation. Only few endpoints have been studied sufficiently to estimate a reliable index. Weighting functions for chronic effects and most importantly for cancer endpoints have been developed in animal models, and often for proxy endpoints only. Epidemiological studies on biological effects of UV radiation should not only depend on single-value weighted UV dose estimates (indexes) but should strive for a more detailed description of the individual exposure. A better understanding of the adverse and beneficial effects of UV radiation by wavelength would also improve medical counseling and health communication regarding individual health-supportive behavior. MDPI 2016-10-24 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5086780/ /pubmed/27783061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101041 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Moshammer, Hanns
Simic, Stana
Haluza, Daniela
UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title_full UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title_fullStr UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title_full_unstemmed UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title_short UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?
title_sort uv “indices”—what do they indicate?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101041
work_keys_str_mv AT moshammerhanns uvindiceswhatdotheyindicate
AT simicstana uvindiceswhatdotheyindicate
AT haluzadaniela uvindiceswhatdotheyindicate