Cargando…

Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity

Understanding vector-parasite interactions is increasingly important as we move towards the endpoint goals set by the Global Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), as interaction dynamics may change with reduced transmission pressure. Elimination models used to predict progra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleave, Katherine, Cook, Darren, Taylor, Mark J., Reimer, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36319
_version_ 1782463848990638080
author Gleave, Katherine
Cook, Darren
Taylor, Mark J.
Reimer, Lisa J.
author_facet Gleave, Katherine
Cook, Darren
Taylor, Mark J.
Reimer, Lisa J.
author_sort Gleave, Katherine
collection PubMed
description Understanding vector-parasite interactions is increasingly important as we move towards the endpoint goals set by the Global Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), as interaction dynamics may change with reduced transmission pressure. Elimination models used to predict programmatic endpoints include parameters for vector-specific transmission dynamics, despite the fact that our knowledge of the host-seeking behaviour of filariasis infected mosquitoes is lacking. We observed a dynamic, stage-specific and density dependent change in Aedes aegypti behaviour towards host cues when exposed to Brugia malayi filarial parasites. Infected mosquitoes exhibited reduced activation and flight towards a host during the period of larval development (L1/L2), transitioning to a 5 fold increase in activation and flight towards a host when infective stage larvae (L3) were present (p < 0.001). In uninfected control mosquitoes, we observed a reduction in convergence towards a host during the same period. Furthermore, this behaviour was density dependent with non-activated mosquitoes harbouring a greater burden of L1 and L2 larvae while activated mosquitoes harboured a greater number of L3 (p < 0.001). Reductions in fecundity were also density-dependent, and extended to mosquitoes that were exposed to microfilariae but did not support larval development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5087081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50870812016-11-04 Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity Gleave, Katherine Cook, Darren Taylor, Mark J. Reimer, Lisa J. Sci Rep Article Understanding vector-parasite interactions is increasingly important as we move towards the endpoint goals set by the Global Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), as interaction dynamics may change with reduced transmission pressure. Elimination models used to predict programmatic endpoints include parameters for vector-specific transmission dynamics, despite the fact that our knowledge of the host-seeking behaviour of filariasis infected mosquitoes is lacking. We observed a dynamic, stage-specific and density dependent change in Aedes aegypti behaviour towards host cues when exposed to Brugia malayi filarial parasites. Infected mosquitoes exhibited reduced activation and flight towards a host during the period of larval development (L1/L2), transitioning to a 5 fold increase in activation and flight towards a host when infective stage larvae (L3) were present (p < 0.001). In uninfected control mosquitoes, we observed a reduction in convergence towards a host during the same period. Furthermore, this behaviour was density dependent with non-activated mosquitoes harbouring a greater burden of L1 and L2 larvae while activated mosquitoes harboured a greater number of L3 (p < 0.001). Reductions in fecundity were also density-dependent, and extended to mosquitoes that were exposed to microfilariae but did not support larval development. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5087081/ /pubmed/27796352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36319 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gleave, Katherine
Cook, Darren
Taylor, Mark J.
Reimer, Lisa J.
Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title_full Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title_fullStr Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title_full_unstemmed Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title_short Filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
title_sort filarial infection influences mosquito behaviour and fecundity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36319
work_keys_str_mv AT gleavekatherine filarialinfectioninfluencesmosquitobehaviourandfecundity
AT cookdarren filarialinfectioninfluencesmosquitobehaviourandfecundity
AT taylormarkj filarialinfectioninfluencesmosquitobehaviourandfecundity
AT reimerlisaj filarialinfectioninfluencesmosquitobehaviourandfecundity