Cargando…

Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation

The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto, Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva, Juen, Leandro, Esposito, Maria Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164826
_version_ 1782463989628796928
author Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto
Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva
Juen, Leandro
Esposito, Maria Cristina
author_facet Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto
Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva
Juen, Leandro
Esposito, Maria Cristina
author_sort Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto
collection PubMed
description The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5087889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50878892016-11-15 Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva Juen, Leandro Esposito, Maria Cristina PLoS One Research Article The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies. Public Library of Science 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5087889/ /pubmed/27798664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164826 Text en © 2016 Pereira de Sousa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto
Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva
Juen, Leandro
Esposito, Maria Cristina
Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title_full Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title_fullStr Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title_short Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): Implications for Conservation
title_sort evaluating the effects of different vegetation types on necrophagous fly communities (diptera: calliphoridae; sarcophagidae): implications for conservation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164826
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiradesousajoseroberto evaluatingtheeffectsofdifferentvegetationtypesonnecrophagousflycommunitiesdipteracalliphoridaesarcophagidaeimplicationsforconservation
AT carvalhofilhofernandodasilva evaluatingtheeffectsofdifferentvegetationtypesonnecrophagousflycommunitiesdipteracalliphoridaesarcophagidaeimplicationsforconservation
AT juenleandro evaluatingtheeffectsofdifferentvegetationtypesonnecrophagousflycommunitiesdipteracalliphoridaesarcophagidaeimplicationsforconservation
AT espositomariacristina evaluatingtheeffectsofdifferentvegetationtypesonnecrophagousflycommunitiesdipteracalliphoridaesarcophagidaeimplicationsforconservation