Cargando…
Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282262 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479 |
_version_ | 1782463998351900672 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Baik, Hyung Won Choi, Kui Son Park, Boyoung Jun, Jae Kwan Hwang, Sang-Hyun Kim, Byung Chang Lee, Chan Wha Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, You Kyoung Han, Dong Soo Lee, Do-Hoon |
author_facet | Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Baik, Hyung Won Choi, Kui Son Park, Boyoung Jun, Jae Kwan Hwang, Sang-Hyun Kim, Byung Chang Lee, Chan Wha Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, You Kyoung Han, Dong Soo Lee, Do-Hoon |
author_sort | Shin, Hye Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). METHODS: In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. RESULTS: The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, −0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5087932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50879322016-11-02 Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Baik, Hyung Won Choi, Kui Son Park, Boyoung Jun, Jae Kwan Hwang, Sang-Hyun Kim, Byung Chang Lee, Chan Wha Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, You Kyoung Han, Dong Soo Lee, Do-Hoon Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). METHODS: In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. RESULTS: The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, −0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016-11 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5087932/ /pubmed/27282262 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Baik, Hyung Won Choi, Kui Son Park, Boyoung Jun, Jae Kwan Hwang, Sang-Hyun Kim, Byung Chang Lee, Chan Wha Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, You Kyoung Han, Dong Soo Lee, Do-Hoon Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | performance of the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening using different stool-collection devices: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282262 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinhyeyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suhmina performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baikhyungwon performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choikuison performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkboyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT junjaekwan performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hwangsanghyun performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimbyungchang performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leechanwha performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohjaehwan performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leeyoukyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT handongsoo performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leedohoon performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial |