Cargando…

Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Hye Young, Suh, Mina, Baik, Hyung Won, Choi, Kui Son, Park, Boyoung, Jun, Jae Kwan, Hwang, Sang-Hyun, Kim, Byung Chang, Lee, Chan Wha, Oh, Jae Hwan, Lee, You Kyoung, Han, Dong Soo, Lee, Do-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282262
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479
_version_ 1782463998351900672
author Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Baik, Hyung Won
Choi, Kui Son
Park, Boyoung
Jun, Jae Kwan
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Kim, Byung Chang
Lee, Chan Wha
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, You Kyoung
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, Do-Hoon
author_facet Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Baik, Hyung Won
Choi, Kui Son
Park, Boyoung
Jun, Jae Kwan
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Kim, Byung Chang
Lee, Chan Wha
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, You Kyoung
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, Do-Hoon
author_sort Shin, Hye Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). METHODS: In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. RESULTS: The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, −0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5087932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50879322016-11-02 Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Baik, Hyung Won Choi, Kui Son Park, Boyoung Jun, Jae Kwan Hwang, Sang-Hyun Kim, Byung Chang Lee, Chan Wha Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, You Kyoung Han, Dong Soo Lee, Do-Hoon Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). METHODS: In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. RESULTS: The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, −0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016-11 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5087932/ /pubmed/27282262 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Baik, Hyung Won
Choi, Kui Son
Park, Boyoung
Jun, Jae Kwan
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Kim, Byung Chang
Lee, Chan Wha
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, You Kyoung
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, Do-Hoon
Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort performance of the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening using different stool-collection devices: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282262
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479
work_keys_str_mv AT shinhyeyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suhmina performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baikhyungwon performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choikuison performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkboyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT junjaekwan performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hwangsanghyun performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimbyungchang performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leechanwha performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohjaehwan performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leeyoukyoung performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT handongsoo performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leedohoon performanceofthefecalimmunochemicaltestforcolorectalcancerscreeningusingdifferentstoolcollectiondevicespreliminaryresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial