Cargando…

Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment

In speech audiometric testing, hearing performance is typically measured by calculating the number of correct repetitions of a speech stimulus. We investigate to what extent the repetition accuracy of Dutch speech stimuli presented against a background noise is influenced by nonauditory processes. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coene, Martine, Krijger, Stefanie, Meeuws, Matthias, De Ceulaer, Geert, Govaerts, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7249848
_version_ 1782464072344666112
author Coene, Martine
Krijger, Stefanie
Meeuws, Matthias
De Ceulaer, Geert
Govaerts, Paul J.
author_facet Coene, Martine
Krijger, Stefanie
Meeuws, Matthias
De Ceulaer, Geert
Govaerts, Paul J.
author_sort Coene, Martine
collection PubMed
description In speech audiometric testing, hearing performance is typically measured by calculating the number of correct repetitions of a speech stimulus. We investigate to what extent the repetition accuracy of Dutch speech stimuli presented against a background noise is influenced by nonauditory processes. We show that variation in verbal repetition accuracy is partially explained by morpholexical and syntactic features of the target language. Verbs, prepositions, conjunctions, determiners, and pronouns yield significantly lower correct repetitions than nouns, adjectives, or adverbs. The reduced repetition performance for verbs and function words is probably best explained by the similarities in the perceptual nature of verbal morphology and function words in Dutch. For sentences, an overall negative effect of syntactic complexity on speech repetition accuracy was found. The lowest number of correct repetitions was obtained with passive sentences, reflecting the cognitive cost of processing a noncanonical sentence structure. Taken together, these findings may have important implications for the audiological practice. In combination with hearing loss, linguistic complexity may increase the cognitive demands to process sentences in noise, leading to suboptimal functional hearing in day-to-day listening situations. Using test sentences with varying degrees of syntactic complexity may therefore provide useful information to measure functional hearing benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5088328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50883282016-11-09 Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment Coene, Martine Krijger, Stefanie Meeuws, Matthias De Ceulaer, Geert Govaerts, Paul J. Biomed Res Int Research Article In speech audiometric testing, hearing performance is typically measured by calculating the number of correct repetitions of a speech stimulus. We investigate to what extent the repetition accuracy of Dutch speech stimuli presented against a background noise is influenced by nonauditory processes. We show that variation in verbal repetition accuracy is partially explained by morpholexical and syntactic features of the target language. Verbs, prepositions, conjunctions, determiners, and pronouns yield significantly lower correct repetitions than nouns, adjectives, or adverbs. The reduced repetition performance for verbs and function words is probably best explained by the similarities in the perceptual nature of verbal morphology and function words in Dutch. For sentences, an overall negative effect of syntactic complexity on speech repetition accuracy was found. The lowest number of correct repetitions was obtained with passive sentences, reflecting the cognitive cost of processing a noncanonical sentence structure. Taken together, these findings may have important implications for the audiological practice. In combination with hearing loss, linguistic complexity may increase the cognitive demands to process sentences in noise, leading to suboptimal functional hearing in day-to-day listening situations. Using test sentences with varying degrees of syntactic complexity may therefore provide useful information to measure functional hearing benefits. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5088328/ /pubmed/27830152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7249848 Text en Copyright © 2016 Martine Coene et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coene, Martine
Krijger, Stefanie
Meeuws, Matthias
De Ceulaer, Geert
Govaerts, Paul J.
Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title_full Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title_fullStr Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title_short Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment
title_sort linguistic factors influencing speech audiometric assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7249848
work_keys_str_mv AT coenemartine linguisticfactorsinfluencingspeechaudiometricassessment
AT krijgerstefanie linguisticfactorsinfluencingspeechaudiometricassessment
AT meeuwsmatthias linguisticfactorsinfluencingspeechaudiometricassessment
AT deceulaergeert linguisticfactorsinfluencingspeechaudiometricassessment
AT govaertspaulj linguisticfactorsinfluencingspeechaudiometricassessment