Cargando…
E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
The importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732 |
_version_ | 1782464122178240512 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Xiao Liao, Chunyu Thompson, Michael L. Soupir, Michelle L. Jarboe, Laura R. Dixon, Philip M. |
author_facet | Liang, Xiao Liao, Chunyu Thompson, Michael L. Soupir, Michelle L. Jarboe, Laura R. Dixon, Philip M. |
author_sort | Liang, Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different environmental habitats. In this study, we investigated the variation in characteristics of E. coli obtained from stream water and stream bottom sediments. Cell properties were measured for 77 genomically different E. coli strains (44 strains isolated from sediments and 33 strains isolated from water) under common stream conditions in the Upper Midwestern United States: pH 8.0, ionic strength 10 mM and 22°C. Measured cell properties include hydrophobicity, zeta potential, net charge, total acidity, and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) composition. Our results indicate that stream sediment E. coli had significantly greater hydrophobicity, greater EPS protein content and EPS sugar content, less negative net charge, and higher point of zero charge than stream water E. coli. A significant positive correlation was observed between hydrophobicity and EPS protein for stream sediment E. coli but not for stream water E. coli. Additionally, E. coli surviving in the same habitat tended to have significantly larger (GTG)(5) genome similarity. After accounting for the intrinsic impact from the genome, environmental habitat was determined to be a factor influencing some cell surface properties, such as hydrophobicity. The diversity of cell properties and its resulting impact on particle interactions should be considered for environmental fate and transport modeling of aquatic indicator organisms such as E. coli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5088573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50885732016-11-15 E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments Liang, Xiao Liao, Chunyu Thompson, Michael L. Soupir, Michelle L. Jarboe, Laura R. Dixon, Philip M. Front Microbiol Microbiology The importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different environmental habitats. In this study, we investigated the variation in characteristics of E. coli obtained from stream water and stream bottom sediments. Cell properties were measured for 77 genomically different E. coli strains (44 strains isolated from sediments and 33 strains isolated from water) under common stream conditions in the Upper Midwestern United States: pH 8.0, ionic strength 10 mM and 22°C. Measured cell properties include hydrophobicity, zeta potential, net charge, total acidity, and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) composition. Our results indicate that stream sediment E. coli had significantly greater hydrophobicity, greater EPS protein content and EPS sugar content, less negative net charge, and higher point of zero charge than stream water E. coli. A significant positive correlation was observed between hydrophobicity and EPS protein for stream sediment E. coli but not for stream water E. coli. Additionally, E. coli surviving in the same habitat tended to have significantly larger (GTG)(5) genome similarity. After accounting for the intrinsic impact from the genome, environmental habitat was determined to be a factor influencing some cell surface properties, such as hydrophobicity. The diversity of cell properties and its resulting impact on particle interactions should be considered for environmental fate and transport modeling of aquatic indicator organisms such as E. coli. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5088573/ /pubmed/27847507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732 Text en Copyright © 2016 Liang, Liao, Thompson, Soupir, Jarboe and Dixon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Liang, Xiao Liao, Chunyu Thompson, Michael L. Soupir, Michelle L. Jarboe, Laura R. Dixon, Philip M. E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title | E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title_full | E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title_fullStr | E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title_full_unstemmed | E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title_short | E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments |
title_sort | e. coli surface properties differ between stream water and sediment environments |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangxiao ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments AT liaochunyu ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments AT thompsonmichaell ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments AT soupirmichellel ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments AT jarboelaurar ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments AT dixonphilipm ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments |