Cargando…
Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning
Foraging specialization allows social insects to more efficiently exploit resources in their environment. Recent research on honeybees suggests that specialization on pollen or nectar among foragers is linked to reproductive physiology and sensory tuning (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGP...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812411 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2599 |
_version_ | 1782464131936288768 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Adam R. Graystock, Peter Hughes, William O.H. |
author_facet | Smith, Adam R. Graystock, Peter Hughes, William O.H. |
author_sort | Smith, Adam R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Foraging specialization allows social insects to more efficiently exploit resources in their environment. Recent research on honeybees suggests that specialization on pollen or nectar among foragers is linked to reproductive physiology and sensory tuning (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, our understanding of the underlying physiological relationships in non-Apis bees is still limited. Here we show that the bumblebee Bombus terrestris has specialist pollen and nectar foragers, and test whether foraging specialization in B. terrestris is linked to reproductive physiology, measured as ovarian activation. We show that neither ovary size, sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), or whole-body lipid stores differed between pollen foragers, nectar foragers, or generalist foragers. Body size also did not differ between any of these three forager groups. Non-foragers had significantly larger ovaries than foragers. This suggests that potentially reproductive individuals avoid foraging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5088620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50886202016-11-03 Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning Smith, Adam R. Graystock, Peter Hughes, William O.H. PeerJ Animal Behavior Foraging specialization allows social insects to more efficiently exploit resources in their environment. Recent research on honeybees suggests that specialization on pollen or nectar among foragers is linked to reproductive physiology and sensory tuning (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, our understanding of the underlying physiological relationships in non-Apis bees is still limited. Here we show that the bumblebee Bombus terrestris has specialist pollen and nectar foragers, and test whether foraging specialization in B. terrestris is linked to reproductive physiology, measured as ovarian activation. We show that neither ovary size, sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), or whole-body lipid stores differed between pollen foragers, nectar foragers, or generalist foragers. Body size also did not differ between any of these three forager groups. Non-foragers had significantly larger ovaries than foragers. This suggests that potentially reproductive individuals avoid foraging. PeerJ Inc. 2016-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5088620/ /pubmed/27812411 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2599 Text en ©2016 Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Smith, Adam R. Graystock, Peter Hughes, William O.H. Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title | Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title_full | Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title_fullStr | Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title_full_unstemmed | Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title_short | Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
title_sort | specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812411 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithadamr specializationonpollenornectarinbumblebeeforagersisnotassociatedwithovarysizelipidreservesorsensorytuning AT graystockpeter specializationonpollenornectarinbumblebeeforagersisnotassociatedwithovarysizelipidreservesorsensorytuning AT hugheswilliamoh specializationonpollenornectarinbumblebeeforagersisnotassociatedwithovarysizelipidreservesorsensorytuning |