Cargando…

Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques

In social animals, group living may impact the risk of infectious disease acquisition in two ways. On the one hand, social connectedness puts individuals at greater risk or susceptibility for acquiring enteric pathogens via contact-mediated transmission. Yet conversely, in strongly bonded societies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balasubramaniam, Krishna, Beisner, Brianne, Vandeleest, Jessica, Atwill, Edward, McCowan, Brenda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812426
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2630
_version_ 1782464133179899904
author Balasubramaniam, Krishna
Beisner, Brianne
Vandeleest, Jessica
Atwill, Edward
McCowan, Brenda
author_facet Balasubramaniam, Krishna
Beisner, Brianne
Vandeleest, Jessica
Atwill, Edward
McCowan, Brenda
author_sort Balasubramaniam, Krishna
collection PubMed
description In social animals, group living may impact the risk of infectious disease acquisition in two ways. On the one hand, social connectedness puts individuals at greater risk or susceptibility for acquiring enteric pathogens via contact-mediated transmission. Yet conversely, in strongly bonded societies like humans and some nonhuman primates, having close connections and strong social ties of support can also socially buffer individuals against susceptibility or transmissibility of infectious agents. Using social network analyses, we assessed the potentially competing roles of contact-mediated transmission and social buffering on the risk of infection from an enteric bacterial pathogen (Shigella flexneri) among captive groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Our results indicate that, within two macaque groups, individuals possessing more direct and especially indirect connections in their grooming and huddling social networks were less susceptible to infection. These results are in sharp contrast to several previous studies that indicate that increased (direct) contact-mediated transmission facilitates infectious disease transmission, including our own findings in a third macaque group in which individuals central in their huddling network and/or which initiated more fights were more likely to be infected. In summary, our findings reveal that an individual’s social connections may increase or decrease its chances of acquiring infectious agents. They extend the applicability of the social buffering hypothesis, beyond just stress and immune-function-related health benefits, to the additional health outcome of infectious disease resistance. Finally, we speculate that the circumstances under which social buffering versus contact-mediated transmission may occur could depend on multiple factors, such as living condition, pathogen-specific transmission routes, and/or an overall social context such as a group’s social stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5088628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50886282016-11-03 Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques Balasubramaniam, Krishna Beisner, Brianne Vandeleest, Jessica Atwill, Edward McCowan, Brenda PeerJ Animal Behavior In social animals, group living may impact the risk of infectious disease acquisition in two ways. On the one hand, social connectedness puts individuals at greater risk or susceptibility for acquiring enteric pathogens via contact-mediated transmission. Yet conversely, in strongly bonded societies like humans and some nonhuman primates, having close connections and strong social ties of support can also socially buffer individuals against susceptibility or transmissibility of infectious agents. Using social network analyses, we assessed the potentially competing roles of contact-mediated transmission and social buffering on the risk of infection from an enteric bacterial pathogen (Shigella flexneri) among captive groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Our results indicate that, within two macaque groups, individuals possessing more direct and especially indirect connections in their grooming and huddling social networks were less susceptible to infection. These results are in sharp contrast to several previous studies that indicate that increased (direct) contact-mediated transmission facilitates infectious disease transmission, including our own findings in a third macaque group in which individuals central in their huddling network and/or which initiated more fights were more likely to be infected. In summary, our findings reveal that an individual’s social connections may increase or decrease its chances of acquiring infectious agents. They extend the applicability of the social buffering hypothesis, beyond just stress and immune-function-related health benefits, to the additional health outcome of infectious disease resistance. Finally, we speculate that the circumstances under which social buffering versus contact-mediated transmission may occur could depend on multiple factors, such as living condition, pathogen-specific transmission routes, and/or an overall social context such as a group’s social stability. PeerJ Inc. 2016-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5088628/ /pubmed/27812426 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2630 Text en ©2016 Balasubramaniam et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Balasubramaniam, Krishna
Beisner, Brianne
Vandeleest, Jessica
Atwill, Edward
McCowan, Brenda
Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title_full Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title_fullStr Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title_full_unstemmed Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title_short Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
title_sort social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812426
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2630
work_keys_str_mv AT balasubramaniamkrishna socialbufferingandcontacttransmissionnetworkconnectionshavebeneficialanddetrimentaleffectsonshigellainfectionriskamongcaptiverhesusmacaques
AT beisnerbrianne socialbufferingandcontacttransmissionnetworkconnectionshavebeneficialanddetrimentaleffectsonshigellainfectionriskamongcaptiverhesusmacaques
AT vandeleestjessica socialbufferingandcontacttransmissionnetworkconnectionshavebeneficialanddetrimentaleffectsonshigellainfectionriskamongcaptiverhesusmacaques
AT atwilledward socialbufferingandcontacttransmissionnetworkconnectionshavebeneficialanddetrimentaleffectsonshigellainfectionriskamongcaptiverhesusmacaques
AT mccowanbrenda socialbufferingandcontacttransmissionnetworkconnectionshavebeneficialanddetrimentaleffectsonshigellainfectionriskamongcaptiverhesusmacaques