Cargando…

Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State

Background: Public and private health sectors both play a crucial role in the health systems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The tuberculosis (TB) control strategy in India encourages the public sector to actively partner with private practitioners (PPs) to improve the quality of front...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salve, Solomon, Sheikh, Kabir, Porter, John DH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27801358
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.52
_version_ 1782464152316411904
author Salve, Solomon
Sheikh, Kabir
Porter, John DH
author_facet Salve, Solomon
Sheikh, Kabir
Porter, John DH
author_sort Salve, Solomon
collection PubMed
description Background: Public and private health sectors both play a crucial role in the health systems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The tuberculosis (TB) control strategy in India encourages the public sector to actively partner with private practitioners (PPs) to improve the quality of front line service delivery. However, ensuring effective and sustainable involvement of PPs constitutes a major challenge. This paper reports the findings from an empirical study focusing on the perspectives and experiences of PPs towards their involvement in TB control programme in India. Methods: The study was carried out between November 2010 and December 2011 in a district of a Southern Indian State and utilised qualitative methodologies, combining observations and in-depth interviews with 21 PPs from different medical systems. The collected data was coded and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: PPs perceived themselves to be crucial healthcare providers, with different roles within the public-private mix (PPM) TB policy. Despite this, PPs felt neglected and undervalued in the actual process of implementation of the PPM-TB policy. The entire process was considered to be government driven and their professional skills and knowledge of different medical systems remained unrecognised at the policy level, and weakened their relationship and bond with the policy and with the programme. PPs had contrasting perceptions about the different components of the TB programme that demonstrated the public sector’s dominance in the overall implementation of the DOTS strategy. Although PPs felt responsible for their TB patients, they found it difficult to perceive themselves as ‘partners with the TB programme.’ Conclusion: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly utilized as a public health strategy to strengthen health systems. These policies will fail if the concerns of the PPs are neglected. To ensure their long-term involvement in the programme the abilities of PPs and the important perspectives from other Indian medical systems need to be recognised and supported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5088723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50887232016-11-01 Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State Salve, Solomon Sheikh, Kabir Porter, John DH Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Public and private health sectors both play a crucial role in the health systems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The tuberculosis (TB) control strategy in India encourages the public sector to actively partner with private practitioners (PPs) to improve the quality of front line service delivery. However, ensuring effective and sustainable involvement of PPs constitutes a major challenge. This paper reports the findings from an empirical study focusing on the perspectives and experiences of PPs towards their involvement in TB control programme in India. Methods: The study was carried out between November 2010 and December 2011 in a district of a Southern Indian State and utilised qualitative methodologies, combining observations and in-depth interviews with 21 PPs from different medical systems. The collected data was coded and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: PPs perceived themselves to be crucial healthcare providers, with different roles within the public-private mix (PPM) TB policy. Despite this, PPs felt neglected and undervalued in the actual process of implementation of the PPM-TB policy. The entire process was considered to be government driven and their professional skills and knowledge of different medical systems remained unrecognised at the policy level, and weakened their relationship and bond with the policy and with the programme. PPs had contrasting perceptions about the different components of the TB programme that demonstrated the public sector’s dominance in the overall implementation of the DOTS strategy. Although PPs felt responsible for their TB patients, they found it difficult to perceive themselves as ‘partners with the TB programme.’ Conclusion: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly utilized as a public health strategy to strengthen health systems. These policies will fail if the concerns of the PPs are neglected. To ensure their long-term involvement in the programme the abilities of PPs and the important perspectives from other Indian medical systems need to be recognised and supported. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5088723/ /pubmed/27801358 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.52 Text en © 2016 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Salve, Solomon
Sheikh, Kabir
Porter, John DH
Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title_full Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title_fullStr Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title_full_unstemmed Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title_short Private Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
title_sort private practitioners’ perspectives on their involvement with the tuberculosis control programme in a southern indian state
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27801358
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.52
work_keys_str_mv AT salvesolomon privatepractitionersperspectivesontheirinvolvementwiththetuberculosiscontrolprogrammeinasouthernindianstate
AT sheikhkabir privatepractitionersperspectivesontheirinvolvementwiththetuberculosiscontrolprogrammeinasouthernindianstate
AT porterjohndh privatepractitionersperspectivesontheirinvolvementwiththetuberculosiscontrolprogrammeinasouthernindianstate