Cargando…

Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling

The particle‐in‐cell method is generally considered a flexible and robust method to model the geodynamic problems with chemical heterogeneity. However, velocity interpolation from grid points to particle locations is often performed without considering the divergence of the velocity field, which can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongliang, Agrusta, Roberto, van Hunen, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27840594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005824
_version_ 1782464208547348480
author Wang, Hongliang
Agrusta, Roberto
van Hunen, Jeroen
author_facet Wang, Hongliang
Agrusta, Roberto
van Hunen, Jeroen
author_sort Wang, Hongliang
collection PubMed
description The particle‐in‐cell method is generally considered a flexible and robust method to model the geodynamic problems with chemical heterogeneity. However, velocity interpolation from grid points to particle locations is often performed without considering the divergence of the velocity field, which can lead to significant particle dispersion or clustering if those particles move through regions of strong velocity gradients. This may ultimately result in cells void of particles, which, if left untreated, may, in turn, lead to numerical inaccuracies. Here we apply a two‐dimensional conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme to steady state and time‐dependent flow fields with strong velocity gradients (e.g., due to large local viscosity variation) and derive and apply the three‐dimensional equivalent. We show that the introduction of CVI significantly reduces the dispersion and clustering of particles in both steady state and time‐dependent flow problems and maintains a locally steady number of particles, without the need for ad hoc remedies such as very high initial particle densities or reseeding during the calculation. We illustrate that this method provides a significant improvement to particle distributions in common geodynamic modeling problems such as subduction zones or lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5089062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50890622016-11-09 Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling Wang, Hongliang Agrusta, Roberto van Hunen, Jeroen Geochem Geophys Geosyst Technical Report The particle‐in‐cell method is generally considered a flexible and robust method to model the geodynamic problems with chemical heterogeneity. However, velocity interpolation from grid points to particle locations is often performed without considering the divergence of the velocity field, which can lead to significant particle dispersion or clustering if those particles move through regions of strong velocity gradients. This may ultimately result in cells void of particles, which, if left untreated, may, in turn, lead to numerical inaccuracies. Here we apply a two‐dimensional conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme to steady state and time‐dependent flow fields with strong velocity gradients (e.g., due to large local viscosity variation) and derive and apply the three‐dimensional equivalent. We show that the introduction of CVI significantly reduces the dispersion and clustering of particles in both steady state and time‐dependent flow problems and maintains a locally steady number of particles, without the need for ad hoc remedies such as very high initial particle densities or reseeding during the calculation. We illustrate that this method provides a significant improvement to particle distributions in common geodynamic modeling problems such as subduction zones or lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary dynamics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-12 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5089062/ /pubmed/27840594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005824 Text en © 2015. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Report
Wang, Hongliang
Agrusta, Roberto
van Hunen, Jeroen
Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title_full Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title_fullStr Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title_short Advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (CVI) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
title_sort advantages of a conservative velocity interpolation (cvi) scheme for particle‐in‐cell methods with application in geodynamic modeling
topic Technical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27840594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005824
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongliang advantagesofaconservativevelocityinterpolationcvischemeforparticleincellmethodswithapplicationingeodynamicmodeling
AT agrustaroberto advantagesofaconservativevelocityinterpolationcvischemeforparticleincellmethodswithapplicationingeodynamicmodeling
AT vanhunenjeroen advantagesofaconservativevelocityinterpolationcvischemeforparticleincellmethodswithapplicationingeodynamicmodeling