Cargando…

Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Short-stem (SS) prostheses require less resection of the femoral neck, produce a more physiological load pattern in the proximal femur, reduce stress shielding, and aid bone conservation and are, therefore, beneficial for young patients. Conventional cementless implants in total hip arth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huo, Shao-Chuan, Wang, Fan, Dong, Lu-Jue, Wei, Wei, Zeng, Jing-Qi, Huang, Hong-Xing, Han, Qing-Min, Duan, Rui-Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27787383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005215
_version_ 1782464217252626432
author Huo, Shao-Chuan
Wang, Fan
Dong, Lu-Jue
Wei, Wei
Zeng, Jing-Qi
Huang, Hong-Xing
Han, Qing-Min
Duan, Rui-Qi
author_facet Huo, Shao-Chuan
Wang, Fan
Dong, Lu-Jue
Wei, Wei
Zeng, Jing-Qi
Huang, Hong-Xing
Han, Qing-Min
Duan, Rui-Qi
author_sort Huo, Shao-Chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Short-stem (SS) prostheses require less resection of the femoral neck, produce a more physiological load pattern in the proximal femur, reduce stress shielding, and aid bone conservation and are, therefore, beneficial for young patients. Conventional cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shown excellent clinical results; however, it is unclear whether SS prostheses can obtain the same clinical and radiological outcomes. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether SS prostheses are superior to conventional implants after primary THA. METHODS: We reviewed the literature published up to June 2016 from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to find relevant RCTs comparing SSs and conventional stems in primary THA. Quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. The RevMan 5.3 software program of the Cochrane Collaboration was used to analyze the data. Random- or fixed-effect models were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison. RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 552 patients with 572 hips were identified. Strong evidence indicated that SS prostheses were more effective for reducing thigh pain than conventional implants (I (2) = 46%, P = 0.002; risk ratio [RR], 95% CI 0.15, 0.04–0.49). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Harris Hip Scores (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.84; SMD, 95% CI 0.02, −0.15–0.18), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scores (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.35; SMD, 95% CI 0.09, −0.10–0.27), femoral offset of stem (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.57; SMD, 95% CI 0.06, −0.16–0.29), and leg-length discrepancy (I (2) = 79%, P = 0.88; SMD, 95% CI 0.04, −0.44–0.51). CONCLUSION: SS prostheses achieve the same clinical and radiological outcomes as conventional implants, and were superior in terms of reducing thigh pain. But whether the postoperative thigh pain applied in 2nd-generation cementless prosthesis still needs further large-scale multicenter studies with longer follow-up to confirm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5089112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50891122016-11-07 Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Huo, Shao-Chuan Wang, Fan Dong, Lu-Jue Wei, Wei Zeng, Jing-Qi Huang, Hong-Xing Han, Qing-Min Duan, Rui-Qi Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Short-stem (SS) prostheses require less resection of the femoral neck, produce a more physiological load pattern in the proximal femur, reduce stress shielding, and aid bone conservation and are, therefore, beneficial for young patients. Conventional cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shown excellent clinical results; however, it is unclear whether SS prostheses can obtain the same clinical and radiological outcomes. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether SS prostheses are superior to conventional implants after primary THA. METHODS: We reviewed the literature published up to June 2016 from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to find relevant RCTs comparing SSs and conventional stems in primary THA. Quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. The RevMan 5.3 software program of the Cochrane Collaboration was used to analyze the data. Random- or fixed-effect models were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison. RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 552 patients with 572 hips were identified. Strong evidence indicated that SS prostheses were more effective for reducing thigh pain than conventional implants (I (2) = 46%, P = 0.002; risk ratio [RR], 95% CI 0.15, 0.04–0.49). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Harris Hip Scores (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.84; SMD, 95% CI 0.02, −0.15–0.18), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scores (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.35; SMD, 95% CI 0.09, −0.10–0.27), femoral offset of stem (I (2) = 0%, P = 0.57; SMD, 95% CI 0.06, −0.16–0.29), and leg-length discrepancy (I (2) = 79%, P = 0.88; SMD, 95% CI 0.04, −0.44–0.51). CONCLUSION: SS prostheses achieve the same clinical and radiological outcomes as conventional implants, and were superior in terms of reducing thigh pain. But whether the postoperative thigh pain applied in 2nd-generation cementless prosthesis still needs further large-scale multicenter studies with longer follow-up to confirm. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5089112/ /pubmed/27787383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005215 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Huo, Shao-Chuan
Wang, Fan
Dong, Lu-Jue
Wei, Wei
Zeng, Jing-Qi
Huang, Hong-Xing
Han, Qing-Min
Duan, Rui-Qi
Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27787383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005215
work_keys_str_mv AT huoshaochuan shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangfan shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT donglujue shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weiwei shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zengjingqi shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huanghongxing shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hanqingmin shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT duanruiqi shortstemprosthesesinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials