Cargando…

Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test

Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera Campos, C.R., Beltramini, G.C., Avelar, W.M., Lima, F.O., Li, L.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437
_version_ 1782464238210514944
author Herrera Campos, C.R.
Beltramini, G.C.
Avelar, W.M.
Lima, F.O.
Li, L.M.
author_facet Herrera Campos, C.R.
Beltramini, G.C.
Avelar, W.M.
Lima, F.O.
Li, L.M.
author_sort Herrera Campos, C.R.
collection PubMed
description Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5089231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50892312016-11-16 Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test Herrera Campos, C.R. Beltramini, G.C. Avelar, W.M. Lima, F.O. Li, L.M. Braz J Med Biol Res Clinical Investigation Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5089231/ /pubmed/27783807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Herrera Campos, C.R.
Beltramini, G.C.
Avelar, W.M.
Lima, F.O.
Li, L.M.
Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title_full Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title_fullStr Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title_full_unstemmed Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title_short Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
title_sort cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using transcranial doppler and mri with apnea test
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437
work_keys_str_mv AT herreracamposcr cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest
AT beltraminigc cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest
AT avelarwm cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest
AT limafo cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest
AT lilm cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest