Cargando…
Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test
Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437 |
_version_ | 1782464238210514944 |
---|---|
author | Herrera Campos, C.R. Beltramini, G.C. Avelar, W.M. Lima, F.O. Li, L.M. |
author_facet | Herrera Campos, C.R. Beltramini, G.C. Avelar, W.M. Lima, F.O. Li, L.M. |
author_sort | Herrera Campos, C.R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5089231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50892312016-11-16 Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test Herrera Campos, C.R. Beltramini, G.C. Avelar, W.M. Lima, F.O. Li, L.M. Braz J Med Biol Res Clinical Investigation Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5089231/ /pubmed/27783807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Herrera Campos, C.R. Beltramini, G.C. Avelar, W.M. Lima, F.O. Li, L.M. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title | Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title_full | Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title_fullStr | Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title_full_unstemmed | Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title_short | Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test |
title_sort | cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using transcranial doppler and mri with apnea test |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27783807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20165437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herreracamposcr cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest AT beltraminigc cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest AT avelarwm cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest AT limafo cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest AT lilm cerebralvasomotorreactivityassessmentusingtranscranialdopplerandmriwithapneatest |