Cargando…

The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)

[Image: see text] Modeling and prediction of polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) sampling rates (R(s)) for 73 compounds using artificial neural networks (ANNs) is presented for the first time. Two models were constructed: the first was developed ab initio using a genetic algorithm (GS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Thomas H., Baz-Lomba, Jose A., Harman, Christopher, Reid, Malcolm J., Owen, Stewart F., Bury, Nicolas R., Thomas, Kevin V., Barron, Leon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01407
_version_ 1782464248442519552
author Miller, Thomas H.
Baz-Lomba, Jose A.
Harman, Christopher
Reid, Malcolm J.
Owen, Stewart F.
Bury, Nicolas R.
Thomas, Kevin V.
Barron, Leon P.
author_facet Miller, Thomas H.
Baz-Lomba, Jose A.
Harman, Christopher
Reid, Malcolm J.
Owen, Stewart F.
Bury, Nicolas R.
Thomas, Kevin V.
Barron, Leon P.
author_sort Miller, Thomas H.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Modeling and prediction of polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) sampling rates (R(s)) for 73 compounds using artificial neural networks (ANNs) is presented for the first time. Two models were constructed: the first was developed ab initio using a genetic algorithm (GSD-model) to shortlist 24 descriptors covering constitutional, topological, geometrical and physicochemical properties and the second model was adapted for R(s) prediction from a previous chromatographic retention model (RTD-model). Mechanistic evaluation of descriptors showed that models did not require comprehensive a priori information to predict R(s). Average predicted errors for the verification and blind test sets were 0.03 ± 0.02 L d(–1) (RTD-model) and 0.03 ± 0.03 L d(–1) (GSD-model) relative to experimentally determined R(s). Prediction variability in replicated models was the same or less than for measured R(s). Networks were externally validated using a measured R(s) data set of six benzodiazepines. The RTD-model performed best in comparison to the GSD-model for these compounds (average absolute errors of 0.0145 ± 0.008 L d(–1) and 0.0437 ± 0.02 L d(–1), respectively). Improvements to generalizability of modeling approaches will be reliant on the need for standardized guidelines for R(s) measurement. The use of in silico tools for R(s) determination represents a more economical approach than laboratory calibrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5089532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50895322016-11-02 The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS) Miller, Thomas H. Baz-Lomba, Jose A. Harman, Christopher Reid, Malcolm J. Owen, Stewart F. Bury, Nicolas R. Thomas, Kevin V. Barron, Leon P. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Modeling and prediction of polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) sampling rates (R(s)) for 73 compounds using artificial neural networks (ANNs) is presented for the first time. Two models were constructed: the first was developed ab initio using a genetic algorithm (GSD-model) to shortlist 24 descriptors covering constitutional, topological, geometrical and physicochemical properties and the second model was adapted for R(s) prediction from a previous chromatographic retention model (RTD-model). Mechanistic evaluation of descriptors showed that models did not require comprehensive a priori information to predict R(s). Average predicted errors for the verification and blind test sets were 0.03 ± 0.02 L d(–1) (RTD-model) and 0.03 ± 0.03 L d(–1) (GSD-model) relative to experimentally determined R(s). Prediction variability in replicated models was the same or less than for measured R(s). Networks were externally validated using a measured R(s) data set of six benzodiazepines. The RTD-model performed best in comparison to the GSD-model for these compounds (average absolute errors of 0.0145 ± 0.008 L d(–1) and 0.0437 ± 0.02 L d(–1), respectively). Improvements to generalizability of modeling approaches will be reliant on the need for standardized guidelines for R(s) measurement. The use of in silico tools for R(s) determination represents a more economical approach than laboratory calibrations. American Chemical Society 2016-07-01 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5089532/ /pubmed/27363449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01407 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Miller, Thomas H.
Baz-Lomba, Jose A.
Harman, Christopher
Reid, Malcolm J.
Owen, Stewart F.
Bury, Nicolas R.
Thomas, Kevin V.
Barron, Leon P.
The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title_full The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title_fullStr The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title_full_unstemmed The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title_short The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS)
title_sort the first attempt at non-linear in silico prediction of sampling rates for polar organic chemical integrative samplers (pocis)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01407
work_keys_str_mv AT millerthomash thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT bazlombajosea thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT harmanchristopher thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT reidmalcolmj thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT owenstewartf thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT burynicolasr thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT thomaskevinv thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis
AT barronleonp thefirstattemptatnonlinearinsilicopredictionofsamplingratesforpolarorganicchemicalintegrativesamplerspocis