Cargando…

Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lum, Mark A., Martin, Alastair J., Alexander, Matthew D., McCoy, David B., Cooke, Daniel L., Lillaney, Prasheel, Moftakhar, Parham, Amans, Matthew R., Settecase, Fabio, Nicholson, Andrew, Dowd, Christopher F., Halbach, Van V., Higashida, Randall T., McDermott, Michael W., Saloner, David, Hetts, Steven W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554
_version_ 1782464294629146624
author Lum, Mark A.
Martin, Alastair J.
Alexander, Matthew D.
McCoy, David B.
Cooke, Daniel L.
Lillaney, Prasheel
Moftakhar, Parham
Amans, Matthew R.
Settecase, Fabio
Nicholson, Andrew
Dowd, Christopher F.
Halbach, Van V.
Higashida, Randall T.
McDermott, Michael W.
Saloner, David
Hetts, Steven W.
author_facet Lum, Mark A.
Martin, Alastair J.
Alexander, Matthew D.
McCoy, David B.
Cooke, Daniel L.
Lillaney, Prasheel
Moftakhar, Parham
Amans, Matthew R.
Settecase, Fabio
Nicholson, Andrew
Dowd, Christopher F.
Halbach, Van V.
Higashida, Randall T.
McDermott, Michael W.
Saloner, David
Hetts, Steven W.
author_sort Lum, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients underwent intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) T2* dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion immediately prior to meningioma embolization. Regional tumor arterial supply was characterized by digital subtraction angiography and classified as external carotid artery (ECA) dural, internal carotid artery (ICA) dural, or pial. MR perfusion data regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed in regions with different vascular supply to extract peak height, full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and mean transit time (MTT). Linear mixed modeling was used to identify perfusion curve parameter differences for each ROI for IA and IV MR imaging techniques. IA vs. IV perfusion parameters were also directly compared for each ROI using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: 18 ROIs were analyzed in 12 patients. Arterial supply was identified as ECA dural (n = 11), ICA dural (n = 4), or pial (n = 3). FWHM, rCBV, and rCBF showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IA MR perfusion. Peak Height and FWHM showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IV MR perfusion. RCBV and MTT were significantly lower for IA perfusion in the Dural ECA compared to IV perfusion. Relative CBF in IA MR was found to be significantly higher in the Dural ICA region and MTT significantly lower compared to IV perfusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5089755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50897552016-11-15 Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging Lum, Mark A. Martin, Alastair J. Alexander, Matthew D. McCoy, David B. Cooke, Daniel L. Lillaney, Prasheel Moftakhar, Parham Amans, Matthew R. Settecase, Fabio Nicholson, Andrew Dowd, Christopher F. Halbach, Van V. Higashida, Randall T. McDermott, Michael W. Saloner, David Hetts, Steven W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients underwent intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) T2* dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion immediately prior to meningioma embolization. Regional tumor arterial supply was characterized by digital subtraction angiography and classified as external carotid artery (ECA) dural, internal carotid artery (ICA) dural, or pial. MR perfusion data regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed in regions with different vascular supply to extract peak height, full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and mean transit time (MTT). Linear mixed modeling was used to identify perfusion curve parameter differences for each ROI for IA and IV MR imaging techniques. IA vs. IV perfusion parameters were also directly compared for each ROI using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: 18 ROIs were analyzed in 12 patients. Arterial supply was identified as ECA dural (n = 11), ICA dural (n = 4), or pial (n = 3). FWHM, rCBV, and rCBF showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IA MR perfusion. Peak Height and FWHM showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IV MR perfusion. RCBV and MTT were significantly lower for IA perfusion in the Dural ECA compared to IV perfusion. Relative CBF in IA MR was found to be significantly higher in the Dural ICA region and MTT significantly lower compared to IV perfusion. Public Library of Science 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5089755/ /pubmed/27802268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554 Text en © 2016 Lum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lum, Mark A.
Martin, Alastair J.
Alexander, Matthew D.
McCoy, David B.
Cooke, Daniel L.
Lillaney, Prasheel
Moftakhar, Parham
Amans, Matthew R.
Settecase, Fabio
Nicholson, Andrew
Dowd, Christopher F.
Halbach, Van V.
Higashida, Randall T.
McDermott, Michael W.
Saloner, David
Hetts, Steven W.
Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title_full Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title_fullStr Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title_short Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
title_sort intra-arterial mr perfusion imaging of meningiomas: comparison to digital subtraction angiography and intravenous mr perfusion imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554
work_keys_str_mv AT lummarka intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT martinalastairj intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT alexandermatthewd intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT mccoydavidb intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT cookedaniell intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT lillaneyprasheel intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT moftakharparham intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT amansmatthewr intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT settecasefabio intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT nicholsonandrew intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT dowdchristopherf intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT halbachvanv intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT higashidarandallt intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT mcdermottmichaelw intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT salonerdavid intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging
AT hettsstevenw intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging