Cargando…
Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554 |
_version_ | 1782464294629146624 |
---|---|
author | Lum, Mark A. Martin, Alastair J. Alexander, Matthew D. McCoy, David B. Cooke, Daniel L. Lillaney, Prasheel Moftakhar, Parham Amans, Matthew R. Settecase, Fabio Nicholson, Andrew Dowd, Christopher F. Halbach, Van V. Higashida, Randall T. McDermott, Michael W. Saloner, David Hetts, Steven W. |
author_facet | Lum, Mark A. Martin, Alastair J. Alexander, Matthew D. McCoy, David B. Cooke, Daniel L. Lillaney, Prasheel Moftakhar, Parham Amans, Matthew R. Settecase, Fabio Nicholson, Andrew Dowd, Christopher F. Halbach, Van V. Higashida, Randall T. McDermott, Michael W. Saloner, David Hetts, Steven W. |
author_sort | Lum, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients underwent intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) T2* dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion immediately prior to meningioma embolization. Regional tumor arterial supply was characterized by digital subtraction angiography and classified as external carotid artery (ECA) dural, internal carotid artery (ICA) dural, or pial. MR perfusion data regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed in regions with different vascular supply to extract peak height, full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and mean transit time (MTT). Linear mixed modeling was used to identify perfusion curve parameter differences for each ROI for IA and IV MR imaging techniques. IA vs. IV perfusion parameters were also directly compared for each ROI using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: 18 ROIs were analyzed in 12 patients. Arterial supply was identified as ECA dural (n = 11), ICA dural (n = 4), or pial (n = 3). FWHM, rCBV, and rCBF showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IA MR perfusion. Peak Height and FWHM showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IV MR perfusion. RCBV and MTT were significantly lower for IA perfusion in the Dural ECA compared to IV perfusion. Relative CBF in IA MR was found to be significantly higher in the Dural ICA region and MTT significantly lower compared to IV perfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5089755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50897552016-11-15 Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging Lum, Mark A. Martin, Alastair J. Alexander, Matthew D. McCoy, David B. Cooke, Daniel L. Lillaney, Prasheel Moftakhar, Parham Amans, Matthew R. Settecase, Fabio Nicholson, Andrew Dowd, Christopher F. Halbach, Van V. Higashida, Randall T. McDermott, Michael W. Saloner, David Hetts, Steven W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of IA MR perfusion to characterize meningioma blood supply. METHODS: Studies were performed in a suite comprised of an x-ray angiography unit and 1.5T MR scanner that permitted intraprocedural patient movement between the imaging modalities. Patients underwent intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) T2* dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion immediately prior to meningioma embolization. Regional tumor arterial supply was characterized by digital subtraction angiography and classified as external carotid artery (ECA) dural, internal carotid artery (ICA) dural, or pial. MR perfusion data regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed in regions with different vascular supply to extract peak height, full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and mean transit time (MTT). Linear mixed modeling was used to identify perfusion curve parameter differences for each ROI for IA and IV MR imaging techniques. IA vs. IV perfusion parameters were also directly compared for each ROI using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: 18 ROIs were analyzed in 12 patients. Arterial supply was identified as ECA dural (n = 11), ICA dural (n = 4), or pial (n = 3). FWHM, rCBV, and rCBF showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IA MR perfusion. Peak Height and FWHM showed statistically significant differences between ROIs for IV MR perfusion. RCBV and MTT were significantly lower for IA perfusion in the Dural ECA compared to IV perfusion. Relative CBF in IA MR was found to be significantly higher in the Dural ICA region and MTT significantly lower compared to IV perfusion. Public Library of Science 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5089755/ /pubmed/27802268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554 Text en © 2016 Lum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lum, Mark A. Martin, Alastair J. Alexander, Matthew D. McCoy, David B. Cooke, Daniel L. Lillaney, Prasheel Moftakhar, Parham Amans, Matthew R. Settecase, Fabio Nicholson, Andrew Dowd, Christopher F. Halbach, Van V. Higashida, Randall T. McDermott, Michael W. Saloner, David Hetts, Steven W. Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title | Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title_full | Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title_fullStr | Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title_short | Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging |
title_sort | intra-arterial mr perfusion imaging of meningiomas: comparison to digital subtraction angiography and intravenous mr perfusion imaging |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lummarka intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT martinalastairj intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT alexandermatthewd intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT mccoydavidb intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT cookedaniell intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT lillaneyprasheel intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT moftakharparham intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT amansmatthewr intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT settecasefabio intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT nicholsonandrew intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT dowdchristopherf intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT halbachvanv intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT higashidarandallt intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT mcdermottmichaelw intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT salonerdavid intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging AT hettsstevenw intraarterialmrperfusionimagingofmeningiomascomparisontodigitalsubtractionangiographyandintravenousmrperfusionimaging |