Cargando…
Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of respons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0 |
_version_ | 1782464334982545408 |
---|---|
author | Andtbacka, Robert H. I. Ross, Merrick Puzanov, Igor Milhem, Mohammed Collichio, Frances Delman, Keith A. Amatruda, Thomas Zager, Jonathan S. Cranmer, Lee Hsueh, Eddy Chen, Lisa Shilkrut, Mark Kaufman, Howard L. |
author_facet | Andtbacka, Robert H. I. Ross, Merrick Puzanov, Igor Milhem, Mohammed Collichio, Frances Delman, Keith A. Amatruda, Thomas Zager, Jonathan S. Cranmer, Lee Hsueh, Eddy Chen, Lisa Shilkrut, Mark Kaufman, Howard L. |
author_sort | Andtbacka, Robert H. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of response to T-VEC from the phase III OPTiM trial of 436 patients with unresected stages IIIB–IV melanoma. METHODS: Lesion-level response analyses were performed based on the type of lesion (injected or uninjected cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions; or visceral lesions [uninjected]), and the best percentage change from baseline of the sum of products of the longest diameters was calculated. Patients randomized to T-VEC (n = 295) who experienced a durable response (continuous partial or complete response for ≥6 months) were evaluated for progression prior to response (PPR), defined as the appearance of a new lesion or >25 % increase in total baseline tumor area. RESULTS: T-VEC resulted in a decrease in size by ≥50 % in 64 % of injected lesions (N = 2116), 34 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions (N = 981), and 15 % of visceral lesions (N = 177). Complete resolution of lesions occurred in 47 % of injected lesions, 22 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 9 % of visceral lesions. Of 48 patients with durable responses, 23 (48 %) experienced PPR, including 14 who developed new lesions only. No difference in overall survival was observed, and median duration of response was not reached in patients with PPR versus those without PPR. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in uninjected lesions provide validation of T-VEC-induced systemic immunotherapeutic effects against melanoma. PPR did not negatively impact the clinical effectiveness of T-VEC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5090012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50900122016-11-17 Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial Andtbacka, Robert H. I. Ross, Merrick Puzanov, Igor Milhem, Mohammed Collichio, Frances Delman, Keith A. Amatruda, Thomas Zager, Jonathan S. Cranmer, Lee Hsueh, Eddy Chen, Lisa Shilkrut, Mark Kaufman, Howard L. Ann Surg Oncol Melanomas PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of response to T-VEC from the phase III OPTiM trial of 436 patients with unresected stages IIIB–IV melanoma. METHODS: Lesion-level response analyses were performed based on the type of lesion (injected or uninjected cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions; or visceral lesions [uninjected]), and the best percentage change from baseline of the sum of products of the longest diameters was calculated. Patients randomized to T-VEC (n = 295) who experienced a durable response (continuous partial or complete response for ≥6 months) were evaluated for progression prior to response (PPR), defined as the appearance of a new lesion or >25 % increase in total baseline tumor area. RESULTS: T-VEC resulted in a decrease in size by ≥50 % in 64 % of injected lesions (N = 2116), 34 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions (N = 981), and 15 % of visceral lesions (N = 177). Complete resolution of lesions occurred in 47 % of injected lesions, 22 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 9 % of visceral lesions. Of 48 patients with durable responses, 23 (48 %) experienced PPR, including 14 who developed new lesions only. No difference in overall survival was observed, and median duration of response was not reached in patients with PPR versus those without PPR. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in uninjected lesions provide validation of T-VEC-induced systemic immunotherapeutic effects against melanoma. PPR did not negatively impact the clinical effectiveness of T-VEC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-06-24 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5090012/ /pubmed/27342831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Melanomas Andtbacka, Robert H. I. Ross, Merrick Puzanov, Igor Milhem, Mohammed Collichio, Frances Delman, Keith A. Amatruda, Thomas Zager, Jonathan S. Cranmer, Lee Hsueh, Eddy Chen, Lisa Shilkrut, Mark Kaufman, Howard L. Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title | Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title_full | Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title_short | Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial |
title_sort | patterns of clinical response with talimogene laherparepvec (t-vec) in patients with melanoma treated in the optim phase iii clinical trial |
topic | Melanomas |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andtbackaroberthi patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT rossmerrick patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT puzanovigor patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT milhemmohammed patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT collichiofrances patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT delmankeitha patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT amatrudathomas patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT zagerjonathans patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT cranmerlee patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT hsueheddy patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT chenlisa patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT shilkrutmark patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT kaufmanhowardl patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial |