Cargando…

Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial

PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andtbacka, Robert H. I., Ross, Merrick, Puzanov, Igor, Milhem, Mohammed, Collichio, Frances, Delman, Keith A., Amatruda, Thomas, Zager, Jonathan S., Cranmer, Lee, Hsueh, Eddy, Chen, Lisa, Shilkrut, Mark, Kaufman, Howard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0
_version_ 1782464334982545408
author Andtbacka, Robert H. I.
Ross, Merrick
Puzanov, Igor
Milhem, Mohammed
Collichio, Frances
Delman, Keith A.
Amatruda, Thomas
Zager, Jonathan S.
Cranmer, Lee
Hsueh, Eddy
Chen, Lisa
Shilkrut, Mark
Kaufman, Howard L.
author_facet Andtbacka, Robert H. I.
Ross, Merrick
Puzanov, Igor
Milhem, Mohammed
Collichio, Frances
Delman, Keith A.
Amatruda, Thomas
Zager, Jonathan S.
Cranmer, Lee
Hsueh, Eddy
Chen, Lisa
Shilkrut, Mark
Kaufman, Howard L.
author_sort Andtbacka, Robert H. I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of response to T-VEC from the phase III OPTiM trial of 436 patients with unresected stages IIIB–IV melanoma. METHODS: Lesion-level response analyses were performed based on the type of lesion (injected or uninjected cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions; or visceral lesions [uninjected]), and the best percentage change from baseline of the sum of products of the longest diameters was calculated. Patients randomized to T-VEC (n = 295) who experienced a durable response (continuous partial or complete response for ≥6 months) were evaluated for progression prior to response (PPR), defined as the appearance of a new lesion or >25 % increase in total baseline tumor area. RESULTS: T-VEC resulted in a decrease in size by ≥50 % in 64 % of injected lesions (N = 2116), 34 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions (N = 981), and 15 % of visceral lesions (N = 177). Complete resolution of lesions occurred in 47 % of injected lesions, 22 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 9 % of visceral lesions. Of 48 patients with durable responses, 23 (48 %) experienced PPR, including 14 who developed new lesions only. No difference in overall survival was observed, and median duration of response was not reached in patients with PPR versus those without PPR. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in uninjected lesions provide validation of T-VEC-induced systemic immunotherapeutic effects against melanoma. PPR did not negatively impact the clinical effectiveness of T-VEC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5090012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50900122016-11-17 Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial Andtbacka, Robert H. I. Ross, Merrick Puzanov, Igor Milhem, Mohammed Collichio, Frances Delman, Keith A. Amatruda, Thomas Zager, Jonathan S. Cranmer, Lee Hsueh, Eddy Chen, Lisa Shilkrut, Mark Kaufman, Howard L. Ann Surg Oncol Melanomas PURPOSE: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy designed to induce tumor regression of injected lesions through direct lytic effects, and of uninjected lesions through induction of systemic antitumor immunity. In this study, we describe the patterns and time course of response to T-VEC from the phase III OPTiM trial of 436 patients with unresected stages IIIB–IV melanoma. METHODS: Lesion-level response analyses were performed based on the type of lesion (injected or uninjected cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions; or visceral lesions [uninjected]), and the best percentage change from baseline of the sum of products of the longest diameters was calculated. Patients randomized to T-VEC (n = 295) who experienced a durable response (continuous partial or complete response for ≥6 months) were evaluated for progression prior to response (PPR), defined as the appearance of a new lesion or >25 % increase in total baseline tumor area. RESULTS: T-VEC resulted in a decrease in size by ≥50 % in 64 % of injected lesions (N = 2116), 34 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions (N = 981), and 15 % of visceral lesions (N = 177). Complete resolution of lesions occurred in 47 % of injected lesions, 22 % of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 9 % of visceral lesions. Of 48 patients with durable responses, 23 (48 %) experienced PPR, including 14 who developed new lesions only. No difference in overall survival was observed, and median duration of response was not reached in patients with PPR versus those without PPR. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in uninjected lesions provide validation of T-VEC-induced systemic immunotherapeutic effects against melanoma. PPR did not negatively impact the clinical effectiveness of T-VEC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-06-24 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5090012/ /pubmed/27342831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Melanomas
Andtbacka, Robert H. I.
Ross, Merrick
Puzanov, Igor
Milhem, Mohammed
Collichio, Frances
Delman, Keith A.
Amatruda, Thomas
Zager, Jonathan S.
Cranmer, Lee
Hsueh, Eddy
Chen, Lisa
Shilkrut, Mark
Kaufman, Howard L.
Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title_full Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title_short Patterns of Clinical Response with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in Patients with Melanoma Treated in the OPTiM Phase III Clinical Trial
title_sort patterns of clinical response with talimogene laherparepvec (t-vec) in patients with melanoma treated in the optim phase iii clinical trial
topic Melanomas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5286-0
work_keys_str_mv AT andtbackaroberthi patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT rossmerrick patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT puzanovigor patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT milhemmohammed patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT collichiofrances patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT delmankeitha patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT amatrudathomas patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT zagerjonathans patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT cranmerlee patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT hsueheddy patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT chenlisa patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT shilkrutmark patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial
AT kaufmanhowardl patternsofclinicalresponsewithtalimogenelaherparepvectvecinpatientswithmelanomatreatedintheoptimphaseiiiclinicaltrial