Cargando…
A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
Native cartilage matrix derived (CMD) scaffolds from various animal and human sources have drawn attention in cartilage tissue engineering due to the demonstrable presence of bioactive components. Different chemical and physical treatments have been employed to enhance the micro-architecture of CMD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/15/6/065001 |
_version_ | 1782464398320730112 |
---|---|
author | Moradi, Ali Pramanik, Sumit Ataollahi, Forough Abdul Khalil, Alizan Kamarul, Tunku Pingguan-Murphy, Belinda |
author_facet | Moradi, Ali Pramanik, Sumit Ataollahi, Forough Abdul Khalil, Alizan Kamarul, Tunku Pingguan-Murphy, Belinda |
author_sort | Moradi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Native cartilage matrix derived (CMD) scaffolds from various animal and human sources have drawn attention in cartilage tissue engineering due to the demonstrable presence of bioactive components. Different chemical and physical treatments have been employed to enhance the micro-architecture of CMD scaffolds. In this study we have assessed the typical effects of physical cross-linking methods, namely ultraviolet (UV) light, dehydrothermal (DHT) treatment, and combinations of them on bovine articular CMD porous scaffolds with three different matrix concentrations (5%, 15% and 30%) to assess the relative strengths of each treatment. Our findings suggest that UV and UV–DHT treatments on 15% CMD scaffolds can yield architecturally optimal scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5090390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50903902016-11-22 A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications Moradi, Ali Pramanik, Sumit Ataollahi, Forough Abdul Khalil, Alizan Kamarul, Tunku Pingguan-Murphy, Belinda Sci Technol Adv Mater Papers Native cartilage matrix derived (CMD) scaffolds from various animal and human sources have drawn attention in cartilage tissue engineering due to the demonstrable presence of bioactive components. Different chemical and physical treatments have been employed to enhance the micro-architecture of CMD scaffolds. In this study we have assessed the typical effects of physical cross-linking methods, namely ultraviolet (UV) light, dehydrothermal (DHT) treatment, and combinations of them on bovine articular CMD porous scaffolds with three different matrix concentrations (5%, 15% and 30%) to assess the relative strengths of each treatment. Our findings suggest that UV and UV–DHT treatments on 15% CMD scaffolds can yield architecturally optimal scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Taylor & Francis 2014-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5090390/ /pubmed/27877731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/15/6/065001 Text en © 2014 National Institute for Materials Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. |
spellingShingle | Papers Moradi, Ali Pramanik, Sumit Ataollahi, Forough Abdul Khalil, Alizan Kamarul, Tunku Pingguan-Murphy, Belinda A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title | A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title_full | A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title_fullStr | A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title_short | A comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
title_sort | comparison study of different physical treatments on cartilage matrix derived porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/15/6/065001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moradiali acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT pramaniksumit acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT ataollahiforough acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT abdulkhalilalizan acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT kamarultunku acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT pingguanmurphybelinda acomparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT moradiali comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT pramaniksumit comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT ataollahiforough comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT abdulkhalilalizan comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT kamarultunku comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications AT pingguanmurphybelinda comparisonstudyofdifferentphysicaltreatmentsoncartilagematrixderivedporousscaffoldsfortissueengineeringapplications |