Cargando…

Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyze the reliability of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) versus autopsy in detecting signs of blood aspiration in a distinct group of patients following deadly head, mouth or floor of mouth gunshot injuries. METHODS: In this study, in 41 cases PMCT was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaparra, E., Peschel, O., Kirchhoff, C., Reiser, M., Kirchhoff, S. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0237-6
_version_ 1782464474676985856
author Scaparra, E.
Peschel, O.
Kirchhoff, C.
Reiser, M.
Kirchhoff, S. M.
author_facet Scaparra, E.
Peschel, O.
Kirchhoff, C.
Reiser, M.
Kirchhoff, S. M.
author_sort Scaparra, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyze the reliability of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) versus autopsy in detecting signs of blood aspiration in a distinct group of patients following deadly head, mouth or floor of mouth gunshot injuries. METHODS: In this study, in 41 cases PMCT was compared to autopsy reports, the gold standard of postmortem exams, regarding detection of blood aspiration. PMCT was evaluated for the presence and level of typical signs of blood aspiration in the major airways and lung using a semi-quantitative scale ranging from level 0 (no aspiration) to 3 (significant aspiration) also taking density values of the described potential aspiratory changes into account. RESULTS: Overall, in 29 (70.7%) of 41 enrolled cases PMCT and autopsy revealed the same level of aspiration. A difference of one level between PMCT and autopsy resulted for 5 (12.2%) of the remaining 12 cases. More than one level difference between both methods resulted for 7 cases (17.2%). Autopsy described no signs of aspiration in 10 cases, compared to 31 cases with reported blood aspiration. In contrast, PMCT revealed no signs of blood aspiration in 15 cases whereas 26 cases were rated as positive for signs of aspiration in the major airways. In 18 of these 26 cases considered positive for blood aspiration by autopsy and PMCT, clear signs of aspiration signs were also described bilaterally by both methods. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study provides evidence for the assumption that PMCT seems to be helpful in the detection of blood aspiration in cases of deadly head gunshots. In conclusion, it seems reasonable to suggest performing PMCT additionally to traditional postmortem exams in cases of suspected aspiration to rule out false-negative cases and to possibly allow for a more detailed and rather evidence based examination reconnoitering the cause of death. However, the adequate use of PMCT in this context needs further evaluation and the definition of an objective scale for aspiration detection on PMCT needs to be established in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5090890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50908902016-11-07 Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy Scaparra, E. Peschel, O. Kirchhoff, C. Reiser, M. Kirchhoff, S. M. Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyze the reliability of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) versus autopsy in detecting signs of blood aspiration in a distinct group of patients following deadly head, mouth or floor of mouth gunshot injuries. METHODS: In this study, in 41 cases PMCT was compared to autopsy reports, the gold standard of postmortem exams, regarding detection of blood aspiration. PMCT was evaluated for the presence and level of typical signs of blood aspiration in the major airways and lung using a semi-quantitative scale ranging from level 0 (no aspiration) to 3 (significant aspiration) also taking density values of the described potential aspiratory changes into account. RESULTS: Overall, in 29 (70.7%) of 41 enrolled cases PMCT and autopsy revealed the same level of aspiration. A difference of one level between PMCT and autopsy resulted for 5 (12.2%) of the remaining 12 cases. More than one level difference between both methods resulted for 7 cases (17.2%). Autopsy described no signs of aspiration in 10 cases, compared to 31 cases with reported blood aspiration. In contrast, PMCT revealed no signs of blood aspiration in 15 cases whereas 26 cases were rated as positive for signs of aspiration in the major airways. In 18 of these 26 cases considered positive for blood aspiration by autopsy and PMCT, clear signs of aspiration signs were also described bilaterally by both methods. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study provides evidence for the assumption that PMCT seems to be helpful in the detection of blood aspiration in cases of deadly head gunshots. In conclusion, it seems reasonable to suggest performing PMCT additionally to traditional postmortem exams in cases of suspected aspiration to rule out false-negative cases and to possibly allow for a more detailed and rather evidence based examination reconnoitering the cause of death. However, the adequate use of PMCT in this context needs further evaluation and the definition of an objective scale for aspiration detection on PMCT needs to be established in future studies. BioMed Central 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5090890/ /pubmed/27802829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0237-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Scaparra, E.
Peschel, O.
Kirchhoff, C.
Reiser, M.
Kirchhoff, S. M.
Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title_full Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title_fullStr Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title_full_unstemmed Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title_short Detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy
title_sort detection of blood aspiration in deadly head gunshots comparing postmortem computed tomography (pmct) and autopsy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0237-6
work_keys_str_mv AT scaparrae detectionofbloodaspirationindeadlyheadgunshotscomparingpostmortemcomputedtomographypmctandautopsy
AT peschelo detectionofbloodaspirationindeadlyheadgunshotscomparingpostmortemcomputedtomographypmctandautopsy
AT kirchhoffc detectionofbloodaspirationindeadlyheadgunshotscomparingpostmortemcomputedtomographypmctandautopsy
AT reiserm detectionofbloodaspirationindeadlyheadgunshotscomparingpostmortemcomputedtomographypmctandautopsy
AT kirchhoffsm detectionofbloodaspirationindeadlyheadgunshotscomparingpostmortemcomputedtomographypmctandautopsy