Cargando…
Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857769 |
_version_ | 1782464499792478208 |
---|---|
author | Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Haghighat, Abbas Torabinia, Nakisa Taghian, Mehdi Sadri, Leyli Naemy, Vahid |
author_facet | Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Haghighat, Abbas Torabinia, Nakisa Taghian, Mehdi Sadri, Leyli Naemy, Vahid |
author_sort | Samandari, Mohammad Hasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal roots of the lower premolars were extracted bilaterally in four female dogs. Sockets were randomly divided into FDBA + PRGF, FDBA, and control groups. Two dogs were sacrificed after 2 weeks and two dogs were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Sockets were assessed histologically and histomorphometrically. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney U-tests utilizing the SPSS software version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: While the difference in density of fibrous tissue in three groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.343), the bone density in grafted groups was significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.021). The least decrease in all socket dimensions was observed in the FDBA group. However, these differences were only significant in coronal portion at week 4. Regarding socket dimensions and bone density, the difference between FDBA and FDBA+PRGF groups was not significant in middle and apical portions. CONCLUSION: The superiority of PRGF+FDBA overFDBA in socket preservation cannot be concluded from this experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5091002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50910022016-11-17 Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Haghighat, Abbas Torabinia, Nakisa Taghian, Mehdi Sadri, Leyli Naemy, Vahid Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal roots of the lower premolars were extracted bilaterally in four female dogs. Sockets were randomly divided into FDBA + PRGF, FDBA, and control groups. Two dogs were sacrificed after 2 weeks and two dogs were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Sockets were assessed histologically and histomorphometrically. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney U-tests utilizing the SPSS software version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: While the difference in density of fibrous tissue in three groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.343), the bone density in grafted groups was significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.021). The least decrease in all socket dimensions was observed in the FDBA group. However, these differences were only significant in coronal portion at week 4. Regarding socket dimensions and bone density, the difference between FDBA and FDBA+PRGF groups was not significant in middle and apical portions. CONCLUSION: The superiority of PRGF+FDBA overFDBA in socket preservation cannot be concluded from this experiment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5091002/ /pubmed/27857769 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Haghighat, Abbas Torabinia, Nakisa Taghian, Mehdi Sadri, Leyli Naemy, Vahid Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title | Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title_full | Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title_fullStr | Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title_short | Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
title_sort | socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samandarimohammadhasan socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs AT haghighatabbas socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs AT torabinianakisa socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs AT taghianmehdi socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs AT sadrileyli socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs AT naemyvahid socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs |