Cargando…

Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs

BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samandari, Mohammad Hasan, Haghighat, Abbas, Torabinia, Nakisa, Taghian, Mehdi, Sadri, Leyli, Naemy, Vahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857769
_version_ 1782464499792478208
author Samandari, Mohammad Hasan
Haghighat, Abbas
Torabinia, Nakisa
Taghian, Mehdi
Sadri, Leyli
Naemy, Vahid
author_facet Samandari, Mohammad Hasan
Haghighat, Abbas
Torabinia, Nakisa
Taghian, Mehdi
Sadri, Leyli
Naemy, Vahid
author_sort Samandari, Mohammad Hasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal roots of the lower premolars were extracted bilaterally in four female dogs. Sockets were randomly divided into FDBA + PRGF, FDBA, and control groups. Two dogs were sacrificed after 2 weeks and two dogs were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Sockets were assessed histologically and histomorphometrically. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney U-tests utilizing the SPSS software version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: While the difference in density of fibrous tissue in three groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.343), the bone density in grafted groups was significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.021). The least decrease in all socket dimensions was observed in the FDBA group. However, these differences were only significant in coronal portion at week 4. Regarding socket dimensions and bone density, the difference between FDBA and FDBA+PRGF groups was not significant in middle and apical portions. CONCLUSION: The superiority of PRGF+FDBA overFDBA in socket preservation cannot be concluded from this experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5091002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50910022016-11-17 Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Haghighat, Abbas Torabinia, Nakisa Taghian, Mehdi Sadri, Leyli Naemy, Vahid Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to FDBA alone and control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal roots of the lower premolars were extracted bilaterally in four female dogs. Sockets were randomly divided into FDBA + PRGF, FDBA, and control groups. Two dogs were sacrificed after 2 weeks and two dogs were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Sockets were assessed histologically and histomorphometrically. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney U-tests utilizing the SPSS software version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: While the difference in density of fibrous tissue in three groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.343), the bone density in grafted groups was significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.021). The least decrease in all socket dimensions was observed in the FDBA group. However, these differences were only significant in coronal portion at week 4. Regarding socket dimensions and bone density, the difference between FDBA and FDBA+PRGF groups was not significant in middle and apical portions. CONCLUSION: The superiority of PRGF+FDBA overFDBA in socket preservation cannot be concluded from this experiment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5091002/ /pubmed/27857769 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Samandari, Mohammad Hasan
Haghighat, Abbas
Torabinia, Nakisa
Taghian, Mehdi
Sadri, Leyli
Naemy, Vahid
Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title_full Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title_fullStr Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title_short Socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
title_sort socket preservation using freeze-dried bone allograft with and without plasma rich in growth factors in dogs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857769
work_keys_str_mv AT samandarimohammadhasan socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs
AT haghighatabbas socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs
AT torabinianakisa socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs
AT taghianmehdi socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs
AT sadrileyli socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs
AT naemyvahid socketpreservationusingfreezedriedboneallograftwithandwithoutplasmarichingrowthfactorsindogs