Cargando…

Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()

OBJECTIVE: To assess the repair results of acromioclavicular dislocations (ACJD) grades III and V, with anchors without eyelet, when compared with other techniques, and to evaluate factors that can affect the final result. METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients with ACJD grades III and V in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do, Claudio, Gustavo Kogake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.015
_version_ 1782464504709251072
author Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do
Claudio, Gustavo Kogake
author_facet Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do
Claudio, Gustavo Kogake
author_sort Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the repair results of acromioclavicular dislocations (ACJD) grades III and V, with anchors without eyelet, when compared with other techniques, and to evaluate factors that can affect the final result. METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients with ACJD grades III and V in the Rockwood classification, 12 treated with anchors without eyelet, 11 with one tightrope, six with two tightropes, and six with subcoracoid cerclage, operated from September 2012 to February 2015. Patients were assessed radiographically and through DASH, UCLA, the visual analog scale of pain (VAS) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Surgical time and the possible influence of some factors in the outcome were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean DASH score was 6.7; UCLA, 32.9; VAS, 1.2; and SF-36, 79.47. Radiographically, the final mean measurement was 9.93 mm, with no statistical difference between the groups. The mean surgical time for Group I was 31 min; Group II, 19 min; Group III, 29 min; and Group IV, 59 min. There was a significant difference between Groups II and IV when compared with the study group. The initial and immediate post-operative ACJD measurements ACJD were correlated with the final measure. CONCLUSION: The repair of acute ACJD with anchors without eyelet is as effective as the other methods, with significantly shorter operative time when compared with the subcoracoid cerclage technique. The final radiological result is influenced by the coracoclavicular initial distance and the immediate postoperative measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5091025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50910252016-11-04 Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques() Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do Claudio, Gustavo Kogake Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the repair results of acromioclavicular dislocations (ACJD) grades III and V, with anchors without eyelet, when compared with other techniques, and to evaluate factors that can affect the final result. METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients with ACJD grades III and V in the Rockwood classification, 12 treated with anchors without eyelet, 11 with one tightrope, six with two tightropes, and six with subcoracoid cerclage, operated from September 2012 to February 2015. Patients were assessed radiographically and through DASH, UCLA, the visual analog scale of pain (VAS) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Surgical time and the possible influence of some factors in the outcome were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean DASH score was 6.7; UCLA, 32.9; VAS, 1.2; and SF-36, 79.47. Radiographically, the final mean measurement was 9.93 mm, with no statistical difference between the groups. The mean surgical time for Group I was 31 min; Group II, 19 min; Group III, 29 min; and Group IV, 59 min. There was a significant difference between Groups II and IV when compared with the study group. The initial and immediate post-operative ACJD measurements ACJD were correlated with the final measure. CONCLUSION: The repair of acute ACJD with anchors without eyelet is as effective as the other methods, with significantly shorter operative time when compared with the subcoracoid cerclage technique. The final radiological result is influenced by the coracoclavicular initial distance and the immediate postoperative measurement. Elsevier 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5091025/ /pubmed/27818978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.015 Text en © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nascimento, Alexandre Tadeu do
Claudio, Gustavo Kogake
Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title_full Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title_fullStr Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title_full_unstemmed Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title_short Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
title_sort functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.015
work_keys_str_mv AT nascimentoalexandretadeudo functionalandradiologicalevaluationofacuteacromioclaviculardislocationtreatedwithanchorswithouteyeletcomparisonwithothertechniques
AT claudiogustavokogake functionalandradiologicalevaluationofacuteacromioclaviculardislocationtreatedwithanchorswithouteyeletcomparisonwithothertechniques