Cargando…
A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence
The global community’s growing enthusiasm for the potential of social accountability approaches to improve health system performance and accelerate health progress makes it imperative that we learn from social accountability intervention implementation experience and results. To this end, we carried...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27190223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw064 |
_version_ | 1782464557695893504 |
---|---|
author | Gullo, Sara Galavotti, Christine Altman, Lara |
author_facet | Gullo, Sara Galavotti, Christine Altman, Lara |
author_sort | Gullo, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The global community’s growing enthusiasm for the potential of social accountability approaches to improve health system performance and accelerate health progress makes it imperative that we learn from social accountability intervention implementation experience and results. To this end, we carried out a review of Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE)’s experience with the Community Score Card© (CSC)—a social accountability approach CARE developed in Malawi. We reviewed projects that CARE implemented between 2002 and 2013 that employed the CSC and that had at least one evaluation in English. We systematically collected and synthesized information from evaluations on the projects’ characteristics, CSC-related outcomes and challenges. Eight projects, spanning five countries, met our inclusion criteria. The projects applied the CSC to various focus areas, mostly health. We identified one to three evaluations, mostly qualitative, for each project. While the evaluations had many limitations, consistency of the results, as well as the range of outcomes, suggests that the CSC is contributing to significant changes. All projects reported CSC-related governance outcomes and service outcomes. There is promising evidence that the CSC can contribute to citizen empowerment, service provider and power-holder effectiveness, accountability and responsiveness and spaces for negotiation between the two that are expanded, effective and inclusive. There is also evidence that the CSC may contribute to improvements in service availability, access, utilization and quality. The CSC seems particularly suited to building trust and strengthening relationships between the community and service providers and to improving the user-centred dimension of quality. All of the projects reported challenges, with ensuring national responsiveness and inclusion of marginalized groups in the CSC process proving to be the most intractable. To improve health system performance and accelerate health progress we recommend further CSC use, enhancements and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5091339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50913392016-11-03 A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence Gullo, Sara Galavotti, Christine Altman, Lara Health Policy Plan Reviews The global community’s growing enthusiasm for the potential of social accountability approaches to improve health system performance and accelerate health progress makes it imperative that we learn from social accountability intervention implementation experience and results. To this end, we carried out a review of Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE)’s experience with the Community Score Card© (CSC)—a social accountability approach CARE developed in Malawi. We reviewed projects that CARE implemented between 2002 and 2013 that employed the CSC and that had at least one evaluation in English. We systematically collected and synthesized information from evaluations on the projects’ characteristics, CSC-related outcomes and challenges. Eight projects, spanning five countries, met our inclusion criteria. The projects applied the CSC to various focus areas, mostly health. We identified one to three evaluations, mostly qualitative, for each project. While the evaluations had many limitations, consistency of the results, as well as the range of outcomes, suggests that the CSC is contributing to significant changes. All projects reported CSC-related governance outcomes and service outcomes. There is promising evidence that the CSC can contribute to citizen empowerment, service provider and power-holder effectiveness, accountability and responsiveness and spaces for negotiation between the two that are expanded, effective and inclusive. There is also evidence that the CSC may contribute to improvements in service availability, access, utilization and quality. The CSC seems particularly suited to building trust and strengthening relationships between the community and service providers and to improving the user-centred dimension of quality. All of the projects reported challenges, with ensuring national responsiveness and inclusion of marginalized groups in the CSC process proving to be the most intractable. To improve health system performance and accelerate health progress we recommend further CSC use, enhancements and research. Oxford University Press 2016-12 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5091339/ /pubmed/27190223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw064 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Reviews Gullo, Sara Galavotti, Christine Altman, Lara A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title | A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title_full | A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title_fullStr | A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title_short | A review of CARE’s Community Score Card experience and evidence |
title_sort | review of care’s community score card experience and evidence |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27190223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gullosara areviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence AT galavottichristine areviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence AT altmanlara areviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence AT gullosara reviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence AT galavottichristine reviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence AT altmanlara reviewofcarescommunityscorecardexperienceandevidence |