Cargando…

A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information

This paper presents a novel framework that links imprecision (through a fuzzy approach) and stochastic uncertainty (through a Bayesian approach) in estimating flood probabilities from historical flood information and systematic flood discharge data. The method exploits the linguistic characteristics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salinas, José Luis, Kiss, Andrea, Viglione, Alberto, Viertl, Reinhard, Blöschl, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27840456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019177
_version_ 1782464620206751744
author Salinas, José Luis
Kiss, Andrea
Viglione, Alberto
Viertl, Reinhard
Blöschl, Günter
author_facet Salinas, José Luis
Kiss, Andrea
Viglione, Alberto
Viertl, Reinhard
Blöschl, Günter
author_sort Salinas, José Luis
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a novel framework that links imprecision (through a fuzzy approach) and stochastic uncertainty (through a Bayesian approach) in estimating flood probabilities from historical flood information and systematic flood discharge data. The method exploits the linguistic characteristics of historical source material to construct membership functions, which may be wider or narrower, depending on the vagueness of the statements. The membership functions are either included in the prior distribution or the likelihood function to obtain a fuzzy version of the flood frequency curve. The viability of the approach is demonstrated by three case studies that differ in terms of their hydromorphological conditions (from an Alpine river with bedrock profile to a flat lowland river with extensive flood plains) and historical source material (including narratives, town and county meeting protocols, flood marks and damage accounts). The case studies are presented in order of increasing fuzziness (the Rhine at Basel, Switzerland; the Werra at Meiningen, Germany; and the Tisza at Szeged, Hungary). Incorporating imprecise historical information is found to reduce the range between the 5% and 95% Bayesian credibility bounds of the 100 year floods by 45% and 61% for the Rhine and Werra case studies, respectively. The strengths and limitations of the framework are discussed relative to alternative (non‐fuzzy) methods. The fuzzy Bayesian inference framework provides a flexible methodology that fits the imprecise nature of linguistic information on historical floods as available in historical written documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5091636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50916362016-11-09 A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information Salinas, José Luis Kiss, Andrea Viglione, Alberto Viertl, Reinhard Blöschl, Günter Water Resour Res Research Articles This paper presents a novel framework that links imprecision (through a fuzzy approach) and stochastic uncertainty (through a Bayesian approach) in estimating flood probabilities from historical flood information and systematic flood discharge data. The method exploits the linguistic characteristics of historical source material to construct membership functions, which may be wider or narrower, depending on the vagueness of the statements. The membership functions are either included in the prior distribution or the likelihood function to obtain a fuzzy version of the flood frequency curve. The viability of the approach is demonstrated by three case studies that differ in terms of their hydromorphological conditions (from an Alpine river with bedrock profile to a flat lowland river with extensive flood plains) and historical source material (including narratives, town and county meeting protocols, flood marks and damage accounts). The case studies are presented in order of increasing fuzziness (the Rhine at Basel, Switzerland; the Werra at Meiningen, Germany; and the Tisza at Szeged, Hungary). Incorporating imprecise historical information is found to reduce the range between the 5% and 95% Bayesian credibility bounds of the 100 year floods by 45% and 61% for the Rhine and Werra case studies, respectively. The strengths and limitations of the framework are discussed relative to alternative (non‐fuzzy) methods. The fuzzy Bayesian inference framework provides a flexible methodology that fits the imprecise nature of linguistic information on historical floods as available in historical written documentation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-09 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5091636/ /pubmed/27840456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019177 Text en © 2016. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Salinas, José Luis
Kiss, Andrea
Viglione, Alberto
Viertl, Reinhard
Blöschl, Günter
A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title_full A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title_fullStr A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title_full_unstemmed A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title_short A fuzzy Bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
title_sort fuzzy bayesian approach to flood frequency estimation with imprecise historical information
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27840456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019177
work_keys_str_mv AT salinasjoseluis afuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT kissandrea afuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT viglionealberto afuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT viertlreinhard afuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT bloschlgunter afuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT salinasjoseluis fuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT kissandrea fuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT viglionealberto fuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT viertlreinhard fuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation
AT bloschlgunter fuzzybayesianapproachtofloodfrequencyestimationwithimprecisehistoricalinformation