Cargando…

Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week, clinician-referred, community-based exercise training program with supervised and unsupervised sessions for men with prostate cancer. The secondary purpose was to determine whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaskin, Cadeyrn J., Fraser, Steve F., Owen, Patrick J., Craike, Melinda, Orellana, Liliana, Livingston, Patricia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0543-6
_version_ 1782464866738503680
author Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
Fraser, Steve F.
Owen, Patrick J.
Craike, Melinda
Orellana, Liliana
Livingston, Patricia M.
author_facet Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
Fraser, Steve F.
Owen, Patrick J.
Craike, Melinda
Orellana, Liliana
Livingston, Patricia M.
author_sort Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week, clinician-referred, community-based exercise training program with supervised and unsupervised sessions for men with prostate cancer. The secondary purpose was to determine whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) modified responses to exercise training. METHODS: Secondary analysis was undertaken on data from a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial in which 15 clinicians were randomly assigned to refer eligible patients to an exercise training intervention (n = 8) or to provide usual care (n = 7). Data from 119 patients (intervention n = 53, control n = 66) were available for this analysis. Outcome measures included fitness and physical function, anthropometrics, resting heart rate, and blood pressure. RESULTS: Compared to the control condition, men in the intervention significantly improved their 6-min walk distance (M (diff) = 49.98 m, p (adj) = 0.001), leg strength (M (diff) = 21.82 kg, p (adj) = 0.001), chest strength (M (diff) = 6.91 kg, p (adj) = 0.001), 30-s sit-to-stand result (M (diff) = 3.38 reps, p (adj) = 0.001), and reach distance (M (diff) = 4.8 cm, p (adj) = 0.024). A significant difference (unadjusted for multiplicity) in favour of men in the intervention was also found for resting heart rate (M (diff) = −3.76 beats/min, p = 0.034). ADT did not modify responses to exercise training. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer who act upon clinician referrals to community-based exercise training programs can improve their strength, physical functioning, and, potentially, cardiovascular health, irrespective of whether or not they are treated with ADT. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Clinicians should inform men with prostate cancer about the benefits of exercise and refer them to appropriately qualified exercise practitioners and suitable community-based programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12610000609055
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5093191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50931912016-11-17 Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study Gaskin, Cadeyrn J. Fraser, Steve F. Owen, Patrick J. Craike, Melinda Orellana, Liliana Livingston, Patricia M. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week, clinician-referred, community-based exercise training program with supervised and unsupervised sessions for men with prostate cancer. The secondary purpose was to determine whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) modified responses to exercise training. METHODS: Secondary analysis was undertaken on data from a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial in which 15 clinicians were randomly assigned to refer eligible patients to an exercise training intervention (n = 8) or to provide usual care (n = 7). Data from 119 patients (intervention n = 53, control n = 66) were available for this analysis. Outcome measures included fitness and physical function, anthropometrics, resting heart rate, and blood pressure. RESULTS: Compared to the control condition, men in the intervention significantly improved their 6-min walk distance (M (diff) = 49.98 m, p (adj) = 0.001), leg strength (M (diff) = 21.82 kg, p (adj) = 0.001), chest strength (M (diff) = 6.91 kg, p (adj) = 0.001), 30-s sit-to-stand result (M (diff) = 3.38 reps, p (adj) = 0.001), and reach distance (M (diff) = 4.8 cm, p (adj) = 0.024). A significant difference (unadjusted for multiplicity) in favour of men in the intervention was also found for resting heart rate (M (diff) = −3.76 beats/min, p = 0.034). ADT did not modify responses to exercise training. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer who act upon clinician referrals to community-based exercise training programs can improve their strength, physical functioning, and, potentially, cardiovascular health, irrespective of whether or not they are treated with ADT. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Clinicians should inform men with prostate cancer about the benefits of exercise and refer them to appropriately qualified exercise practitioners and suitable community-based programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12610000609055 Springer US 2016-04-20 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5093191/ /pubmed/27098346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0543-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
Fraser, Steve F.
Owen, Patrick J.
Craike, Melinda
Orellana, Liliana
Livingston, Patricia M.
Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title_full Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title_fullStr Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title_full_unstemmed Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title_short Fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the ENGAGE study
title_sort fitness outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of exercise training for men with prostate cancer: the engage study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0543-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gaskincadeyrnj fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy
AT fraserstevef fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy
AT owenpatrickj fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy
AT craikemelinda fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy
AT orellanaliliana fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy
AT livingstonpatriciam fitnessoutcomesfromarandomisedcontrolledtrialofexercisetrainingformenwithprostatecancertheengagestudy