Cargando…

Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis

OBJECTIVES: There is controversy on the proposed benefits of publishing mortality rates for individual surgeons. In some procedures, analysis at the level of an individual surgeon may lack statistical power. The aim was to determine the likelihood that variation in surgeon performance will be detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Ewen M, Drake, Thomas M, O'Neill, Stephen, Shaw, Catherine A, Garden, O James, Wigmore, Stephen J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012471
_version_ 1782464968778579968
author Harrison, Ewen M
Drake, Thomas M
O'Neill, Stephen
Shaw, Catherine A
Garden, O James
Wigmore, Stephen J
author_facet Harrison, Ewen M
Drake, Thomas M
O'Neill, Stephen
Shaw, Catherine A
Garden, O James
Wigmore, Stephen J
author_sort Harrison, Ewen M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is controversy on the proposed benefits of publishing mortality rates for individual surgeons. In some procedures, analysis at the level of an individual surgeon may lack statistical power. The aim was to determine the likelihood that variation in surgeon performance will be detected using published outcome data. DESIGN: A national analysis surgeon-level mortality rates to calculate the level of power for the reported mortality rate across multiple surgical procedures. SETTING: The UK from 2010 to 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Surgeons who performed colon cancer resection, oesophagectomy or gastrectomy, elective aortic aneurysm repair, hip replacement, bariatric surgery or thyroidectomy. OUTCOMES: The likelihood of detecting an individual with a 30-day, 90-day or in-patient mortality rate of up to 5 times the national mean or median (as available). This was represented using a novel heat-map approach. RESULTS: Overall mortality rates for the procedures ranged from 0.07% to 4.5% and mean/median surgeon volume was between 23 and 75 cases. The national median case volume for colorectal (n=55) and upper gastrointestinal (n=23) cancer resections provides around 20% power to detect a mortality rate of 3 times the national median, while, for hip replacement, this is a rate 5 times the national average. At the mortality rates reported for thyroid (0.08%) and bariatric (0.07%) procedures, it is unlikely a surgeon would perform a sufficient number of procedures in his/her entire career to stand a good chance of detecting a mortality rate 5 times the national average. CONCLUSIONS: At present, surgeons with increased mortality rates are unlikely to be detected. Performance within an expected mortality rate range cannot be considered reliable evidence of acceptable performance. Alternative approaches should focus on commonly occurring meaningful outcome measures, with infrequent events analysed predominately at the hospital level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5093625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50936252016-11-14 Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis Harrison, Ewen M Drake, Thomas M O'Neill, Stephen Shaw, Catherine A Garden, O James Wigmore, Stephen J BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: There is controversy on the proposed benefits of publishing mortality rates for individual surgeons. In some procedures, analysis at the level of an individual surgeon may lack statistical power. The aim was to determine the likelihood that variation in surgeon performance will be detected using published outcome data. DESIGN: A national analysis surgeon-level mortality rates to calculate the level of power for the reported mortality rate across multiple surgical procedures. SETTING: The UK from 2010 to 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Surgeons who performed colon cancer resection, oesophagectomy or gastrectomy, elective aortic aneurysm repair, hip replacement, bariatric surgery or thyroidectomy. OUTCOMES: The likelihood of detecting an individual with a 30-day, 90-day or in-patient mortality rate of up to 5 times the national mean or median (as available). This was represented using a novel heat-map approach. RESULTS: Overall mortality rates for the procedures ranged from 0.07% to 4.5% and mean/median surgeon volume was between 23 and 75 cases. The national median case volume for colorectal (n=55) and upper gastrointestinal (n=23) cancer resections provides around 20% power to detect a mortality rate of 3 times the national median, while, for hip replacement, this is a rate 5 times the national average. At the mortality rates reported for thyroid (0.08%) and bariatric (0.07%) procedures, it is unlikely a surgeon would perform a sufficient number of procedures in his/her entire career to stand a good chance of detecting a mortality rate 5 times the national average. CONCLUSIONS: At present, surgeons with increased mortality rates are unlikely to be detected. Performance within an expected mortality rate range cannot be considered reliable evidence of acceptable performance. Alternative approaches should focus on commonly occurring meaningful outcome measures, with infrequent events analysed predominately at the hospital level. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5093625/ /pubmed/27799243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012471 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Harrison, Ewen M
Drake, Thomas M
O'Neill, Stephen
Shaw, Catherine A
Garden, O James
Wigmore, Stephen J
Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title_full Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title_fullStr Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title_short Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis
title_sort individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? a national utility analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012471
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonewenm individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis
AT drakethomasm individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis
AT oneillstephen individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis
AT shawcatherinea individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis
AT gardenojames individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis
AT wigmorestephenj individualsurgeonmortalityratescanoutliersbedetectedanationalutilityanalysis