Cargando…

Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the changes in corneal biomechanical properties following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Q-FS-LASIK). METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, patients with a sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jun, Zheng, Li, Zhao, Xia, Xu, Yang, Chen, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.004
_version_ 1782465007740518400
author Zhang, Jun
Zheng, Li
Zhao, Xia
Xu, Yang
Chen, Shu
author_facet Zhang, Jun
Zheng, Li
Zhao, Xia
Xu, Yang
Chen, Shu
author_sort Zhang, Jun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the changes in corneal biomechanical properties following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Q-FS-LASIK). METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, patients with a sphere plus cylinder measurement of less than −10.00 D and cylinder measurement of less than −5.00 D were included in the study. A total of 160 patients (160 eyes) with myopia and myopic astigmatism were divided into the two groups, with 80 patients (80 eyes) allocated to SMILE and 80 patients (80 eyes) allocated to Q-FS-LASIK. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) were quantitatively assessed using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) preoperatively and at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Both types of surgery were associated with statistically significant decreases in CH and the CRF at postoperative day 1 (both P < 0.01). In both groups, the decreases subsequently stabilized with no further deteriorations compared to postoperative day 1 (P > 0.05). Both groups showed similar biomechanical changes at each time point (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE and Q-FS-LASIK resulted in a decrease in CH and the CRF at postoperative 1 day, with the decreases stabilizing after this point. There were no significant differences between the short term effects of SMILE and Q-FS-LASIK on corneal biomechanical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5093843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50938432016-11-09 Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis Zhang, Jun Zheng, Li Zhao, Xia Xu, Yang Chen, Shu J Curr Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the changes in corneal biomechanical properties following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Q-FS-LASIK). METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, patients with a sphere plus cylinder measurement of less than −10.00 D and cylinder measurement of less than −5.00 D were included in the study. A total of 160 patients (160 eyes) with myopia and myopic astigmatism were divided into the two groups, with 80 patients (80 eyes) allocated to SMILE and 80 patients (80 eyes) allocated to Q-FS-LASIK. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) were quantitatively assessed using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) preoperatively and at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Both types of surgery were associated with statistically significant decreases in CH and the CRF at postoperative day 1 (both P < 0.01). In both groups, the decreases subsequently stabilized with no further deteriorations compared to postoperative day 1 (P > 0.05). Both groups showed similar biomechanical changes at each time point (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE and Q-FS-LASIK resulted in a decrease in CH and the CRF at postoperative 1 day, with the decreases stabilizing after this point. There were no significant differences between the short term effects of SMILE and Q-FS-LASIK on corneal biomechanical properties. Elsevier 2016-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5093843/ /pubmed/27830201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.004 Text en © 2016, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Jun
Zheng, Li
Zhao, Xia
Xu, Yang
Chen, Shu
Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title_full Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title_fullStr Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title_full_unstemmed Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title_short Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
title_sort corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus q-value–guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjun cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionversusqvalueguidedfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT zhengli cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionversusqvalueguidedfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT zhaoxia cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionversusqvalueguidedfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT xuyang cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionversusqvalueguidedfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT chenshu cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionversusqvalueguidedfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis