Cargando…

Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of subthreshold diode laser micropulse (SDM) in comparison with conventional laser photocoagulation in the treatment of the diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with clinically significant DME wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fazel, Farhad, Bagheri, Majid, Golabchi, Khodayar, Jahanbani Ardakani, Hamidreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.007
_version_ 1782465007967010816
author Fazel, Farhad
Bagheri, Majid
Golabchi, Khodayar
Jahanbani Ardakani, Hamidreza
author_facet Fazel, Farhad
Bagheri, Majid
Golabchi, Khodayar
Jahanbani Ardakani, Hamidreza
author_sort Fazel, Farhad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of subthreshold diode laser micropulse (SDM) in comparison with conventional laser photocoagulation in the treatment of the diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with clinically significant DME were divided randomly into two equal groups. In the first group, SDM photocoagulation was employed, while conventional laser photocoagulation was performed on the eyes of the second group. Central macular thickness (CMT), central macular volume (CMV), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured before, 2, and 4 months after intervention, and the results were compared. RESULTS: The mean CMT was 357.3 and 354.8 microns before the treatment in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.85), and decreased significantly to 344.3 and 349.8 after 4 months, respectively (P = 0.012 and P = 0.049). The changes in the central macular thickness was statistically higher in the first group (P = 0.001). The mean CMV significantly decreased in Group 1 (P = 0.003), but it was similar to pretreatment in Group 2 after 4 months (P = 0.31). The BCVA improved significantly in Group 1 (P < 0.001), but it remained unchanged in Group 2 (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SDM was more effective than conventional laser photocoagulation in reducing CMT and CMV and improving visual acuity in patients with DME.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5093846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50938462016-11-09 Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema Fazel, Farhad Bagheri, Majid Golabchi, Khodayar Jahanbani Ardakani, Hamidreza J Curr Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of subthreshold diode laser micropulse (SDM) in comparison with conventional laser photocoagulation in the treatment of the diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with clinically significant DME were divided randomly into two equal groups. In the first group, SDM photocoagulation was employed, while conventional laser photocoagulation was performed on the eyes of the second group. Central macular thickness (CMT), central macular volume (CMV), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured before, 2, and 4 months after intervention, and the results were compared. RESULTS: The mean CMT was 357.3 and 354.8 microns before the treatment in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.85), and decreased significantly to 344.3 and 349.8 after 4 months, respectively (P = 0.012 and P = 0.049). The changes in the central macular thickness was statistically higher in the first group (P = 0.001). The mean CMV significantly decreased in Group 1 (P = 0.003), but it was similar to pretreatment in Group 2 after 4 months (P = 0.31). The BCVA improved significantly in Group 1 (P < 0.001), but it remained unchanged in Group 2 (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SDM was more effective than conventional laser photocoagulation in reducing CMT and CMV and improving visual acuity in patients with DME. Elsevier 2016-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5093846/ /pubmed/27830205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.007 Text en © 2016, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fazel, Farhad
Bagheri, Majid
Golabchi, Khodayar
Jahanbani Ardakani, Hamidreza
Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title_full Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title_short Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
title_sort comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT fazelfarhad comparisonofsubthresholddiodelasermicropulsetherapyversusconventionalphotocoagulationlasertherapyasprimarytreatmentofdiabeticmacularedema
AT bagherimajid comparisonofsubthresholddiodelasermicropulsetherapyversusconventionalphotocoagulationlasertherapyasprimarytreatmentofdiabeticmacularedema
AT golabchikhodayar comparisonofsubthresholddiodelasermicropulsetherapyversusconventionalphotocoagulationlasertherapyasprimarytreatmentofdiabeticmacularedema
AT jahanbaniardakanihamidreza comparisonofsubthresholddiodelasermicropulsetherapyversusconventionalphotocoagulationlasertherapyasprimarytreatmentofdiabeticmacularedema