Cargando…

The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding sulfuric acid to sugarcane tops silage on rumen bacteria and whole rumen microorganisms (WRM) and compare the digestibility of sugarcane tops treated with different amount of urea, molasses and sulfuric acid between Holstein cow and Khouzes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharifi, Afrooz, Chaji, Morteza, Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urmia University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872716
_version_ 1782465075520471040
author Sharifi, Afrooz
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
author_facet Sharifi, Afrooz
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
author_sort Sharifi, Afrooz
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding sulfuric acid to sugarcane tops silage on rumen bacteria and whole rumen microorganisms (WRM) and compare the digestibility of sugarcane tops treated with different amount of urea, molasses and sulfuric acid between Holstein cow and Khouzestan buffalo. Regardless of the type of the treatment, potential of gas production (B) by cow WRM (130.670 mL) was more than buffalo (104.060 mL) (p < 0.05), but the rate of gas production (C) by buffalo WRM was greater than cow (0.021 and 0.014 mL per hr, respectively) (p < 0.05). The C in treatment containing only 2.40% sulfuric acid (0.033 mL per hr) was significantly highest (p < 0.05). Regardless of the type of the treatment, the B by cow rumen bacteria (75.040 mL) was more than buffalo (67.150 mL), (p < 0.05), while the C by rumen bacteria of buffalo (0.030 mL per hr) was more than cow (0.017 mL per hr), (p < 0.05). Regardless of the type of the animal, the B coefficient of rumen bacteria in treatment only containing 2.40% sulfuric acid was higher than control (p < 0.05). Therefore, the addition of sulfuric acid not only had no negative effect on microorganisms particularly bacteria, but also probably due to present of sulfur in acid, had positive effect on nutrients digestibility, and growth of microorganisms. The digestibility of sugarcane tops silage treated by cow rumen bacteria and whole microorganisms was higher than buffalo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5094162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Urmia University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50941622016-11-21 The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen Sharifi, Afrooz Chaji, Morteza Mohammadabadi, Tahereh Vet Res Forum Original Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding sulfuric acid to sugarcane tops silage on rumen bacteria and whole rumen microorganisms (WRM) and compare the digestibility of sugarcane tops treated with different amount of urea, molasses and sulfuric acid between Holstein cow and Khouzestan buffalo. Regardless of the type of the treatment, potential of gas production (B) by cow WRM (130.670 mL) was more than buffalo (104.060 mL) (p < 0.05), but the rate of gas production (C) by buffalo WRM was greater than cow (0.021 and 0.014 mL per hr, respectively) (p < 0.05). The C in treatment containing only 2.40% sulfuric acid (0.033 mL per hr) was significantly highest (p < 0.05). Regardless of the type of the treatment, the B by cow rumen bacteria (75.040 mL) was more than buffalo (67.150 mL), (p < 0.05), while the C by rumen bacteria of buffalo (0.030 mL per hr) was more than cow (0.017 mL per hr), (p < 0.05). Regardless of the type of the animal, the B coefficient of rumen bacteria in treatment only containing 2.40% sulfuric acid was higher than control (p < 0.05). Therefore, the addition of sulfuric acid not only had no negative effect on microorganisms particularly bacteria, but also probably due to present of sulfur in acid, had positive effect on nutrients digestibility, and growth of microorganisms. The digestibility of sugarcane tops silage treated by cow rumen bacteria and whole microorganisms was higher than buffalo. Urmia University Press 2016 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5094162/ /pubmed/27872716 Text en © 2016 Urmia University. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharifi, Afrooz
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title_full The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title_fullStr The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title_short The comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo rumen
title_sort comparison of digestibility of treated sugarcane tops silage by bacteria or whole microorganisms of holstein cow and buffalo rumen
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872716
work_keys_str_mv AT sharifiafrooz thecomparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen
AT chajimorteza thecomparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen
AT mohammadabaditahereh thecomparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen
AT sharifiafrooz comparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen
AT chajimorteza comparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen
AT mohammadabaditahereh comparisonofdigestibilityoftreatedsugarcanetopssilagebybacteriaorwholemicroorganismsofholsteincowandbuffalorumen