Cargando…
A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Urmia University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872720 |
_version_ | 1782465075762692096 |
---|---|
author | Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali Onsori, Masoud Saberivand, Adel |
author_facet | Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali Onsori, Masoud Saberivand, Adel |
author_sort | Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and swum-up sperm), different cryopreservation mediums on the basis of glycerol, milk and egg yolk were used. Then, all of the samples were vitrified in the liquid nitrogen and thawed at least 48 hr later for re-examination of sperm parameters. The sperm parameters before and after cryopreservation in all groups were compared. It was found that during vitrification process, spermatozoa were damaged by the mechanical blows in centrifugation during swim-up processing, so they had less resistance than fresh semen. The examination of different cryoprotectants revealed that milk has better effects on the cryopreservation of semen than glycerol and egg yolk. With the comparison of the effects of glycerol and egg yolk as cryoprotectants, it was found that glycerol had better effects than egg yolk on the cryopreservation of the semen. In conclusion, milk might be used as a cryoprotectant instead of glycerol for canine sperm cryopreservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5094163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Urmia University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50941632016-11-21 A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali Onsori, Masoud Saberivand, Adel Vet Res Forum Original Article Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and swum-up sperm), different cryopreservation mediums on the basis of glycerol, milk and egg yolk were used. Then, all of the samples were vitrified in the liquid nitrogen and thawed at least 48 hr later for re-examination of sperm parameters. The sperm parameters before and after cryopreservation in all groups were compared. It was found that during vitrification process, spermatozoa were damaged by the mechanical blows in centrifugation during swim-up processing, so they had less resistance than fresh semen. The examination of different cryoprotectants revealed that milk has better effects on the cryopreservation of semen than glycerol and egg yolk. With the comparison of the effects of glycerol and egg yolk as cryoprotectants, it was found that glycerol had better effects than egg yolk on the cryopreservation of the semen. In conclusion, milk might be used as a cryoprotectant instead of glycerol for canine sperm cryopreservation. Urmia University Press 2016 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5094163/ /pubmed/27872720 Text en © 2016 Urmia University. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali Onsori, Masoud Saberivand, Adel A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title | A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title_full | A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title_short | A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
title_sort | comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nourigharajelarsahar acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT sadrkhanloorajabali acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT onsorimasoud acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT saberivandadel acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT nourigharajelarsahar comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT sadrkhanloorajabali comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT onsorimasoud comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess AT saberivandadel comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess |