Cargando…

A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process

Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar, Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali, Onsori, Masoud, Saberivand, Adel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urmia University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872720
_version_ 1782465075762692096
author Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar
Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali
Onsori, Masoud
Saberivand, Adel
author_facet Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar
Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali
Onsori, Masoud
Saberivand, Adel
author_sort Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar
collection PubMed
description Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and swum-up sperm), different cryopreservation mediums on the basis of glycerol, milk and egg yolk were used. Then, all of the samples were vitrified in the liquid nitrogen and thawed at least 48 hr later for re-examination of sperm parameters. The sperm parameters before and after cryopreservation in all groups were compared. It was found that during vitrification process, spermatozoa were damaged by the mechanical blows in centrifugation during swim-up processing, so they had less resistance than fresh semen. The examination of different cryoprotectants revealed that milk has better effects on the cryopreservation of semen than glycerol and egg yolk. With the comparison of the effects of glycerol and egg yolk as cryoprotectants, it was found that glycerol had better effects than egg yolk on the cryopreservation of the semen. In conclusion, milk might be used as a cryoprotectant instead of glycerol for canine sperm cryopreservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5094163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Urmia University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50941632016-11-21 A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali Onsori, Masoud Saberivand, Adel Vet Res Forum Original Article Cryopreservation has the capacity to extend spermatozoa’s lifespan and viability. In addition, the semen samples can be collected, preserved and stored or sent to distant locations and still be used long after the death of the semen donor. In this study for the vitrification of dog sperm (fresh and swum-up sperm), different cryopreservation mediums on the basis of glycerol, milk and egg yolk were used. Then, all of the samples were vitrified in the liquid nitrogen and thawed at least 48 hr later for re-examination of sperm parameters. The sperm parameters before and after cryopreservation in all groups were compared. It was found that during vitrification process, spermatozoa were damaged by the mechanical blows in centrifugation during swim-up processing, so they had less resistance than fresh semen. The examination of different cryoprotectants revealed that milk has better effects on the cryopreservation of semen than glycerol and egg yolk. With the comparison of the effects of glycerol and egg yolk as cryoprotectants, it was found that glycerol had better effects than egg yolk on the cryopreservation of the semen. In conclusion, milk might be used as a cryoprotectant instead of glycerol for canine sperm cryopreservation. Urmia University Press 2016 2016-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5094163/ /pubmed/27872720 Text en © 2016 Urmia University. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nouri Gharajelar, Sahar
Sadrkhanloo, Rajab Ali
Onsori, Masoud
Saberivand, Adel
A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title_full A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title_fullStr A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title_short A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
title_sort comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872720
work_keys_str_mv AT nourigharajelarsahar acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT sadrkhanloorajabali acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT onsorimasoud acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT saberivandadel acomparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT nourigharajelarsahar comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT sadrkhanloorajabali comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT onsorimasoud comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess
AT saberivandadel comparativestudyontheeffectsofdifferentcryoprotectantsonthequalityofcaninespermduringvitrificationprocess