Cargando…
Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients
BACKGROUND: Dendritic Cell (DC) vaccination is a very promising therapeutic strategy in cancer patients. The immunizing ability of DC is critically influenced by their migration activity to lymphatic tissues, where they have the task of priming naïve T-cells. In the present study in vivo DC migratio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC509425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15285807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-27 |
_version_ | 1782121709502988288 |
---|---|
author | Ridolfi, Ruggero Riccobon, Angela Galassi, Riccardo Giorgetti, Gianluigi Petrini, Massimiliano Fiammenghi, Laura Stefanelli, Monica Ridolfi, Laura Moretti, Andrea Migliori, Giuseppe Fiorentini, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Ridolfi, Ruggero Riccobon, Angela Galassi, Riccardo Giorgetti, Gianluigi Petrini, Massimiliano Fiammenghi, Laura Stefanelli, Monica Ridolfi, Laura Moretti, Andrea Migliori, Giuseppe Fiorentini, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Ridolfi, Ruggero |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dendritic Cell (DC) vaccination is a very promising therapeutic strategy in cancer patients. The immunizing ability of DC is critically influenced by their migration activity to lymphatic tissues, where they have the task of priming naïve T-cells. In the present study in vivo DC migration was investigated within the context of a clinical trial of antitumor vaccination. In particular, we compared the migration activity of mature Dendritic Cells (mDC) with that of immature Dendritic Cells (iDC) and also assessed intradermal versus subcutaneous administration. METHODS: DC were labelled with (99m)Tc-HMPAO or (111)In-Oxine, and the presence of labelled DC in regional lymph nodes was evaluated at pre-set times up to a maximum of 72 h after inoculation. Determinations were carried out in 8 patients (7 melanoma and 1 renal cell carcinoma). RESULTS: It was verified that intradermal administration resulted in about a threefold higher migration to lymph nodes than subcutaneous administration, while mDC showed, on average, a six-to eightfold higher migration than iDC. The first DC were detected in lymph nodes 20–60 min after inoculation and the maximum concentration was reached after 48–72 h. CONCLUSIONS: These data obtained in vivo provide preliminary basic information on DC with respect to their antitumor immunization activity. Further research is needed to optimize the therapeutic potential of vaccination with DC. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-509425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5094252004-08-15 Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients Ridolfi, Ruggero Riccobon, Angela Galassi, Riccardo Giorgetti, Gianluigi Petrini, Massimiliano Fiammenghi, Laura Stefanelli, Monica Ridolfi, Laura Moretti, Andrea Migliori, Giuseppe Fiorentini, Giuseppe J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Dendritic Cell (DC) vaccination is a very promising therapeutic strategy in cancer patients. The immunizing ability of DC is critically influenced by their migration activity to lymphatic tissues, where they have the task of priming naïve T-cells. In the present study in vivo DC migration was investigated within the context of a clinical trial of antitumor vaccination. In particular, we compared the migration activity of mature Dendritic Cells (mDC) with that of immature Dendritic Cells (iDC) and also assessed intradermal versus subcutaneous administration. METHODS: DC were labelled with (99m)Tc-HMPAO or (111)In-Oxine, and the presence of labelled DC in regional lymph nodes was evaluated at pre-set times up to a maximum of 72 h after inoculation. Determinations were carried out in 8 patients (7 melanoma and 1 renal cell carcinoma). RESULTS: It was verified that intradermal administration resulted in about a threefold higher migration to lymph nodes than subcutaneous administration, while mDC showed, on average, a six-to eightfold higher migration than iDC. The first DC were detected in lymph nodes 20–60 min after inoculation and the maximum concentration was reached after 48–72 h. CONCLUSIONS: These data obtained in vivo provide preliminary basic information on DC with respect to their antitumor immunization activity. Further research is needed to optimize the therapeutic potential of vaccination with DC. BioMed Central 2004-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC509425/ /pubmed/15285807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-27 Text en Copyright © 2004 Ridolfi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ridolfi, Ruggero Riccobon, Angela Galassi, Riccardo Giorgetti, Gianluigi Petrini, Massimiliano Fiammenghi, Laura Stefanelli, Monica Ridolfi, Laura Moretti, Andrea Migliori, Giuseppe Fiorentini, Giuseppe Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title | Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title_full | Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title_short | Evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
title_sort | evaluation of in vivo labelled dendritic cell migration in cancer patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC509425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15285807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridolfiruggero evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT riccobonangela evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT galassiriccardo evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT giorgettigianluigi evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT petrinimassimiliano evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT fiammenghilaura evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT stefanellimonica evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT ridolfilaura evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT morettiandrea evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT migliorigiuseppe evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients AT fiorentinigiuseppe evaluationofinvivolabelleddendriticcellmigrationincancerpatients |