Cargando…

Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments

Those involved with pollinator risk assessment know that agricultural crops vary in attractiveness to bees. Intuitively, this means that exposure to agricultural pesticides is likely greatest for attractive plants and lowest for unattractive plants. While crop attractiveness in the risk assessment p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knopper, Loren D, Dan, Tereza, Reisig, Dominic D, Johnson, Josephine D, Bowers, Lisa M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4321
_version_ 1782465116464218112
author Knopper, Loren D
Dan, Tereza
Reisig, Dominic D
Johnson, Josephine D
Bowers, Lisa M
author_facet Knopper, Loren D
Dan, Tereza
Reisig, Dominic D
Johnson, Josephine D
Bowers, Lisa M
author_sort Knopper, Loren D
collection PubMed
description Those involved with pollinator risk assessment know that agricultural crops vary in attractiveness to bees. Intuitively, this means that exposure to agricultural pesticides is likely greatest for attractive plants and lowest for unattractive plants. While crop attractiveness in the risk assessment process has been qualitatively remarked on by some authorities, absent is direction on how to refine the process with quantitative metrics of attractiveness. At a high level, attractiveness of crops to bees appears to depend on several key variables, including but not limited to: floral, olfactory, visual and tactile cues; seasonal availability; physical and behavioral characteristics of the bee; plant and nectar rewards. Notwithstanding the complexities and interactions among these variables, sugar content in nectar stands out as a suitable quantitative metric by which to refine pollinator risk assessments for attractiveness. Provided herein is a proposed way to use sugar nectar concentration to adjust the exposure parameter (with what is called a crop attractiveness factor) in the calculation of risk quotients in order to derive crop‐specific tier I assessments. This Perspective is meant to invite discussion on incorporating such changes in the risk assessment process. © 2016 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5094517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50945172016-11-09 Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments Knopper, Loren D Dan, Tereza Reisig, Dominic D Johnson, Josephine D Bowers, Lisa M Pest Manag Sci Perspective Those involved with pollinator risk assessment know that agricultural crops vary in attractiveness to bees. Intuitively, this means that exposure to agricultural pesticides is likely greatest for attractive plants and lowest for unattractive plants. While crop attractiveness in the risk assessment process has been qualitatively remarked on by some authorities, absent is direction on how to refine the process with quantitative metrics of attractiveness. At a high level, attractiveness of crops to bees appears to depend on several key variables, including but not limited to: floral, olfactory, visual and tactile cues; seasonal availability; physical and behavioral characteristics of the bee; plant and nectar rewards. Notwithstanding the complexities and interactions among these variables, sugar content in nectar stands out as a suitable quantitative metric by which to refine pollinator risk assessments for attractiveness. Provided herein is a proposed way to use sugar nectar concentration to adjust the exposure parameter (with what is called a crop attractiveness factor) in the calculation of risk quotients in order to derive crop‐specific tier I assessments. This Perspective is meant to invite discussion on incorporating such changes in the risk assessment process. © 2016 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-06-27 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5094517/ /pubmed/27197566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4321 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Knopper, Loren D
Dan, Tereza
Reisig, Dominic D
Johnson, Josephine D
Bowers, Lisa M
Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title_full Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title_fullStr Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title_full_unstemmed Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title_short Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
title_sort sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4321
work_keys_str_mv AT knopperlorend sugarconcentrationinnectaraquantitativemetricofcropattractivenessforrefinedpollinatorriskassessments
AT dantereza sugarconcentrationinnectaraquantitativemetricofcropattractivenessforrefinedpollinatorriskassessments
AT reisigdominicd sugarconcentrationinnectaraquantitativemetricofcropattractivenessforrefinedpollinatorriskassessments
AT johnsonjosephined sugarconcentrationinnectaraquantitativemetricofcropattractivenessforrefinedpollinatorriskassessments
AT bowerslisam sugarconcentrationinnectaraquantitativemetricofcropattractivenessforrefinedpollinatorriskassessments