Cargando…

Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System

Objective analysis of hand and finger kinematics is important to increase understanding of hand function and to quantify motor symptoms for clinical diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to compare a new 3D measurement system containing multiple miniature inertial sensors (PowerGlove) with an opto-ele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Noort, Josien C., Kortier, Henk G., van Beek, Nathalie, Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J., Veltink, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164889
_version_ 1782465171760873472
author van den Noort, Josien C.
Kortier, Henk G.
van Beek, Nathalie
Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J.
Veltink, Peter H.
author_facet van den Noort, Josien C.
Kortier, Henk G.
van Beek, Nathalie
Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J.
Veltink, Peter H.
author_sort van den Noort, Josien C.
collection PubMed
description Objective analysis of hand and finger kinematics is important to increase understanding of hand function and to quantify motor symptoms for clinical diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to compare a new 3D measurement system containing multiple miniature inertial sensors (PowerGlove) with an opto-electronic marker system during specific finger tasks in three healthy subjects. Various finger movements tasks were performed: flexion, fast flexion, tapping, hand open/closing, ab/adduction and circular pointing. 3D joint angles of the index finger joints and position of the thumb and index were compared between systems. Median root mean square differences of the main joint angles of interest ranged between 3.3 and 8.4deg. Largest differences were found in fast and circular pointing tasks, mainly in range of motion. Smallest differences for all 3D joint angles were observed in the flexion tasks. For fast finger tapping, the thumb/index amplitude showed a median difference of 15.8mm. Differences could be explained by skin movement artifacts caused by relative marker movements of the marker system, particularly during fast tasks; large movement accelerations and angular velocities which exceeded the range of the inertial sensors; and by differences in segment calibrations between systems. The PowerGlove is a system that can be of value to measure 3D hand and finger kinematics and positions in an ambulatory setting. The reported differences need to be taken into account when applying the system in studies understanding the hand function and quantifying hand motor symptoms in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5094774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50947742016-11-18 Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System van den Noort, Josien C. Kortier, Henk G. van Beek, Nathalie Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J. Veltink, Peter H. PLoS One Research Article Objective analysis of hand and finger kinematics is important to increase understanding of hand function and to quantify motor symptoms for clinical diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to compare a new 3D measurement system containing multiple miniature inertial sensors (PowerGlove) with an opto-electronic marker system during specific finger tasks in three healthy subjects. Various finger movements tasks were performed: flexion, fast flexion, tapping, hand open/closing, ab/adduction and circular pointing. 3D joint angles of the index finger joints and position of the thumb and index were compared between systems. Median root mean square differences of the main joint angles of interest ranged between 3.3 and 8.4deg. Largest differences were found in fast and circular pointing tasks, mainly in range of motion. Smallest differences for all 3D joint angles were observed in the flexion tasks. For fast finger tapping, the thumb/index amplitude showed a median difference of 15.8mm. Differences could be explained by skin movement artifacts caused by relative marker movements of the marker system, particularly during fast tasks; large movement accelerations and angular velocities which exceeded the range of the inertial sensors; and by differences in segment calibrations between systems. The PowerGlove is a system that can be of value to measure 3D hand and finger kinematics and positions in an ambulatory setting. The reported differences need to be taken into account when applying the system in studies understanding the hand function and quantifying hand motor symptoms in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2016-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5094774/ /pubmed/27812139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164889 Text en © 2016 van den Noort et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van den Noort, Josien C.
Kortier, Henk G.
van Beek, Nathalie
Veeger, DirkJan H. E. J.
Veltink, Peter H.
Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title_full Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title_fullStr Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title_full_unstemmed Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title_short Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics—A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System
title_sort measuring 3d hand and finger kinematics—a comparison between inertial sensing and an opto-electronic marker system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164889
work_keys_str_mv AT vandennoortjosienc measuring3dhandandfingerkinematicsacomparisonbetweeninertialsensingandanoptoelectronicmarkersystem
AT kortierhenkg measuring3dhandandfingerkinematicsacomparisonbetweeninertialsensingandanoptoelectronicmarkersystem
AT vanbeeknathalie measuring3dhandandfingerkinematicsacomparisonbetweeninertialsensingandanoptoelectronicmarkersystem
AT veegerdirkjanhej measuring3dhandandfingerkinematicsacomparisonbetweeninertialsensingandanoptoelectronicmarkersystem
AT veltinkpeterh measuring3dhandandfingerkinematicsacomparisonbetweeninertialsensingandanoptoelectronicmarkersystem