Cargando…

Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the gastrointestinal tract depends on a variety of methods: endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and different types of biopsy. Making an error-free diagnosis is vital for the subsequent application of an appropriate treatment. AIM: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaicekauskas, Rolandas, Stanaitis, Juozas, Valantinas, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5095269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829943
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.61429
_version_ 1782465271755177984
author Vaicekauskas, Rolandas
Stanaitis, Juozas
Valantinas, Jonas
author_facet Vaicekauskas, Rolandas
Stanaitis, Juozas
Valantinas, Jonas
author_sort Vaicekauskas, Rolandas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the gastrointestinal tract depends on a variety of methods: endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and different types of biopsy. Making an error-free diagnosis is vital for the subsequent application of an appropriate treatment. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of deep biopsy via the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique for SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a case series study. Deep biopsy via the ESD technique was completed in 38 patients between November 2012 and October 2014. Thirty-eight SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract of varying size (very small ≤ 1 cm, small 1–2 cm and large ≥ 2 cm) by means of the ESD technique after an incision with an electrosurgical knife of the overlying layers and revealing a small part of the lesion were biopsied under direct endoscopic view. RESULTS: Deep biopsy via the ESD technique was diagnostic in 28 of 38 patients (73.3%; 95% CI: 59.7–89.7%). The diagnostic yield for SELs with a clear endophytic shape increased to 91.3%. An evident endophytic appearance of a subepithelial lesion, the mean number of biopsied samples (6.65 ±1.36) and the total size in length of all samples per case (19.88 ±8.07 mm) were the main criteria influencing the positiveness of deep biopsy in the diagnostic group compared to the nondiagnostic one (p = 0.001; p = 0.025; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Deep biopsy via the ESD technique is an effective and safe method for the diagnosis of SELs especially with a clear endophytic appearance in a large number of biopsied samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5095269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50952692016-11-09 Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract Vaicekauskas, Rolandas Stanaitis, Juozas Valantinas, Jonas Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the gastrointestinal tract depends on a variety of methods: endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and different types of biopsy. Making an error-free diagnosis is vital for the subsequent application of an appropriate treatment. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of deep biopsy via the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique for SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a case series study. Deep biopsy via the ESD technique was completed in 38 patients between November 2012 and October 2014. Thirty-eight SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract of varying size (very small ≤ 1 cm, small 1–2 cm and large ≥ 2 cm) by means of the ESD technique after an incision with an electrosurgical knife of the overlying layers and revealing a small part of the lesion were biopsied under direct endoscopic view. RESULTS: Deep biopsy via the ESD technique was diagnostic in 28 of 38 patients (73.3%; 95% CI: 59.7–89.7%). The diagnostic yield for SELs with a clear endophytic shape increased to 91.3%. An evident endophytic appearance of a subepithelial lesion, the mean number of biopsied samples (6.65 ±1.36) and the total size in length of all samples per case (19.88 ±8.07 mm) were the main criteria influencing the positiveness of deep biopsy in the diagnostic group compared to the nondiagnostic one (p = 0.001; p = 0.025; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Deep biopsy via the ESD technique is an effective and safe method for the diagnosis of SELs especially with a clear endophytic appearance in a large number of biopsied samples. Termedia Publishing House 2016-07-22 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5095269/ /pubmed/27829943 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.61429 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Fundacja Videochirurgii http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Vaicekauskas, Rolandas
Stanaitis, Juozas
Valantinas, Jonas
Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_fullStr Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_short Efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_sort efficacy of deep biopsy for subepithelial lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5095269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829943
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.61429
work_keys_str_mv AT vaicekauskasrolandas efficacyofdeepbiopsyforsubepitheliallesionsintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT stanaitisjuozas efficacyofdeepbiopsyforsubepitheliallesionsintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT valantinasjonas efficacyofdeepbiopsyforsubepitheliallesionsintheuppergastrointestinaltract