Cargando…
Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces
BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of approximal caries is generally difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the pen-type laser fluorescence device (LF pen) to detect approximal carious lesions in comparison to bitewing radiographs (BW). METHODS: Three hundred forty-one tooth s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5095970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27809872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0126-9 |
_version_ | 1782465383787134976 |
---|---|
author | Bizhang, M. Wollenweber, N. Singh-Hüsgen, P. Danesh, G. Zimmer, S. |
author_facet | Bizhang, M. Wollenweber, N. Singh-Hüsgen, P. Danesh, G. Zimmer, S. |
author_sort | Bizhang, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of approximal caries is generally difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the pen-type laser fluorescence device (LF pen) to detect approximal carious lesions in comparison to bitewing radiographs (BW). METHODS: Three hundred forty-one tooth surfaces were diagnosed in 20 patients with an average age of 26.70 (±2.82) years. Each test tooth was sequentially assessed by a single calibrated examiner using visual inspection, BW, and the LF pen. Radiographs were used as the gold standard to calculate an appropriate cut-off. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values for cut-off limits of 15, measured by the LF pen were compared using the chi(2) test (McNemar test). For approximal caries at D3 level, the highest values of specificity and sensitivity were observed for the LF pen at a cut-off value of 15 (96.8 and 83.0 %) and for visual inspection (99.3 and 4.3 %). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, dentin caries on approximal surfaces could be detected equally well by the LF pen as by the bitewing radiographs. Therefore, the LF pen can be recommended as an alternative to radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in a regular dental practice setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004817 on DRKS on 12(th) March 2013. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5095970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50959702016-11-07 Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces Bizhang, M. Wollenweber, N. Singh-Hüsgen, P. Danesh, G. Zimmer, S. Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of approximal caries is generally difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the pen-type laser fluorescence device (LF pen) to detect approximal carious lesions in comparison to bitewing radiographs (BW). METHODS: Three hundred forty-one tooth surfaces were diagnosed in 20 patients with an average age of 26.70 (±2.82) years. Each test tooth was sequentially assessed by a single calibrated examiner using visual inspection, BW, and the LF pen. Radiographs were used as the gold standard to calculate an appropriate cut-off. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values for cut-off limits of 15, measured by the LF pen were compared using the chi(2) test (McNemar test). For approximal caries at D3 level, the highest values of specificity and sensitivity were observed for the LF pen at a cut-off value of 15 (96.8 and 83.0 %) and for visual inspection (99.3 and 4.3 %). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, dentin caries on approximal surfaces could be detected equally well by the LF pen as by the bitewing radiographs. Therefore, the LF pen can be recommended as an alternative to radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in a regular dental practice setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004817 on DRKS on 12(th) March 2013. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5095970/ /pubmed/27809872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0126-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bizhang, M. Wollenweber, N. Singh-Hüsgen, P. Danesh, G. Zimmer, S. Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title | Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title_full | Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title_fullStr | Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title_short | Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
title_sort | pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5095970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27809872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0126-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bizhangm pentypelaserfluorescencedeviceversusbitewingradiographsforcariesdetectiononapproximalsurfaces AT wollenwebern pentypelaserfluorescencedeviceversusbitewingradiographsforcariesdetectiononapproximalsurfaces AT singhhusgenp pentypelaserfluorescencedeviceversusbitewingradiographsforcariesdetectiononapproximalsurfaces AT daneshg pentypelaserfluorescencedeviceversusbitewingradiographsforcariesdetectiononapproximalsurfaces AT zimmers pentypelaserfluorescencedeviceversusbitewingradiographsforcariesdetectiononapproximalsurfaces |