Cargando…
Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains
Previous publications have described unethical organ procurement procedures in the People's Republic of China. International awareness and condemnation contributed to the announcement abolishing the procurement of organs from executed prisoners starting from January 2015. Eighteen months after...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14014 |
_version_ | 1782465432748294144 |
---|---|
author | Trey, T. Sharif, A. Schwarz, A. Fiatarone Singh, M. Lavee, J. |
author_facet | Trey, T. Sharif, A. Schwarz, A. Fiatarone Singh, M. Lavee, J. |
author_sort | Trey, T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous publications have described unethical organ procurement procedures in the People's Republic of China. International awareness and condemnation contributed to the announcement abolishing the procurement of organs from executed prisoners starting from January 2015. Eighteen months after the announcement, and aligned with the upcoming International Congress of the Transplantation Society in Hong Kong, this paper revisits the topic and discusses whether the declared reform has indeed been implemented. China has neither addressed nor included in the reform a pledge to end the procurement of organs from prisoners of conscience, nor has the government initiated any legislative amendments. Recent reports have discussed an implausible discrepancy of officially reported steady annual transplant numbers and a steep expansion of the transplant infrastructure in China. This paper expresses the viewpoint that, in the current context, it is not possible to verify the veracity of the announced changes, and it thus remains premature to include China as an ethical partner in the international transplant community. Until we have independent and objective evidence of a complete cessation of unethical organ procurement from prisoners, the medical community has a professional responsibility to maintain the academic embargo on Chinese transplant professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5096240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50962402016-11-09 Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains Trey, T. Sharif, A. Schwarz, A. Fiatarone Singh, M. Lavee, J. Am J Transplant Personal Viewpoint Previous publications have described unethical organ procurement procedures in the People's Republic of China. International awareness and condemnation contributed to the announcement abolishing the procurement of organs from executed prisoners starting from January 2015. Eighteen months after the announcement, and aligned with the upcoming International Congress of the Transplantation Society in Hong Kong, this paper revisits the topic and discusses whether the declared reform has indeed been implemented. China has neither addressed nor included in the reform a pledge to end the procurement of organs from prisoners of conscience, nor has the government initiated any legislative amendments. Recent reports have discussed an implausible discrepancy of officially reported steady annual transplant numbers and a steep expansion of the transplant infrastructure in China. This paper expresses the viewpoint that, in the current context, it is not possible to verify the veracity of the announced changes, and it thus remains premature to include China as an ethical partner in the international transplant community. Until we have independent and objective evidence of a complete cessation of unethical organ procurement from prisoners, the medical community has a professional responsibility to maintain the academic embargo on Chinese transplant professionals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-19 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5096240/ /pubmed/27532896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14014 Text en © 2016 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Transplant Surgeons This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Personal Viewpoint Trey, T. Sharif, A. Schwarz, A. Fiatarone Singh, M. Lavee, J. Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title | Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title_full | Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title_fullStr | Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title_full_unstemmed | Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title_short | Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains |
title_sort | transplant medicine in china: need for transparency and international scrutiny remains |
topic | Personal Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT treyt transplantmedicineinchinaneedfortransparencyandinternationalscrutinyremains AT sharifa transplantmedicineinchinaneedfortransparencyandinternationalscrutinyremains AT schwarza transplantmedicineinchinaneedfortransparencyandinternationalscrutinyremains AT fiataronesinghm transplantmedicineinchinaneedfortransparencyandinternationalscrutinyremains AT laveej transplantmedicineinchinaneedfortransparencyandinternationalscrutinyremains |