Cargando…
Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017 |
_version_ | 1782465433449791488 |
---|---|
author | Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. Becker, René Kumpulainen, Tatu de Bruin, Bas Sawada, Tomohisa Kato, Taito Fujita, Makoto Reek, Joost N. H. |
author_facet | Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. Becker, René Kumpulainen, Tatu de Bruin, Bas Sawada, Tomohisa Kato, Taito Fujita, Makoto Reek, Joost N. H. |
author_sort | Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular encapsulation. In this contribution, it is demonstrated that Ir and Rh‐Cp‐type metal complexes can be encapsulated inside a self‐assembled M(6)L(4) metallocage only in the presence of an aromatic compound as a second guest. The individual guests are not encapsulated, suggesting that only the pair of guests can fill the void of the cage. Hence, selective co‐encapsulation is observed. This principle is demonstrated by co‐encapsulation of a variety of combinations of metal complexes and aromatic guests, leading to several ternary complexes. These experiments demonstrate that the efficiency of formation of the ternary complexes depends on the individual components. Moreover, selective exchange of the components is possible, leading to formation of the most favorable complex. Besides the obvious size effect, a charge‐transfer interaction may also contribute to this effect. Charge‐transfer bands are clearly observed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. A change in the oxidation potential of the encapsulated electron donor also leads to a shift in the charge‐transfer energy bands. As expected, metal complexes with a higher oxidation potential give rise to a higher charge‐transfer energy and a larger hypsochromic shift in the UV/Vis spectrum. These subtle energy differences may potentially be used to control the binding and reactivity of the complexes bound in a confined space. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5096245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50962452016-11-09 Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. Becker, René Kumpulainen, Tatu de Bruin, Bas Sawada, Tomohisa Kato, Taito Fujita, Makoto Reek, Joost N. H. Chemistry Full Papers There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular encapsulation. In this contribution, it is demonstrated that Ir and Rh‐Cp‐type metal complexes can be encapsulated inside a self‐assembled M(6)L(4) metallocage only in the presence of an aromatic compound as a second guest. The individual guests are not encapsulated, suggesting that only the pair of guests can fill the void of the cage. Hence, selective co‐encapsulation is observed. This principle is demonstrated by co‐encapsulation of a variety of combinations of metal complexes and aromatic guests, leading to several ternary complexes. These experiments demonstrate that the efficiency of formation of the ternary complexes depends on the individual components. Moreover, selective exchange of the components is possible, leading to formation of the most favorable complex. Besides the obvious size effect, a charge‐transfer interaction may also contribute to this effect. Charge‐transfer bands are clearly observed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. A change in the oxidation potential of the encapsulated electron donor also leads to a shift in the charge‐transfer energy bands. As expected, metal complexes with a higher oxidation potential give rise to a higher charge‐transfer energy and a larger hypsochromic shift in the UV/Vis spectrum. These subtle energy differences may potentially be used to control the binding and reactivity of the complexes bound in a confined space. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-14 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5096245/ /pubmed/27624751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. Becker, René Kumpulainen, Tatu de Bruin, Bas Sawada, Tomohisa Kato, Taito Fujita, Makoto Reek, Joost N. H. Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title | Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title_full | Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title_fullStr | Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title_short | Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage |
title_sort | selective co‐encapsulation inside an m(6)l(4) cage |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leendersstefanham selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT beckerrene selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT kumpulainentatu selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT debruinbas selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT sawadatomohisa selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT katotaito selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT fujitamakoto selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage AT reekjoostnh selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage |