Cargando…

Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage

There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leenders, Stefan H. A. M., Becker, René, Kumpulainen, Tatu, de Bruin, Bas, Sawada, Tomohisa, Kato, Taito, Fujita, Makoto, Reek, Joost N. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017
_version_ 1782465433449791488
author Leenders, Stefan H. A. M.
Becker, René
Kumpulainen, Tatu
de Bruin, Bas
Sawada, Tomohisa
Kato, Taito
Fujita, Makoto
Reek, Joost N. H.
author_facet Leenders, Stefan H. A. M.
Becker, René
Kumpulainen, Tatu
de Bruin, Bas
Sawada, Tomohisa
Kato, Taito
Fujita, Makoto
Reek, Joost N. H.
author_sort Leenders, Stefan H. A. M.
collection PubMed
description There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular encapsulation. In this contribution, it is demonstrated that Ir and Rh‐Cp‐type metal complexes can be encapsulated inside a self‐assembled M(6)L(4) metallocage only in the presence of an aromatic compound as a second guest. The individual guests are not encapsulated, suggesting that only the pair of guests can fill the void of the cage. Hence, selective co‐encapsulation is observed. This principle is demonstrated by co‐encapsulation of a variety of combinations of metal complexes and aromatic guests, leading to several ternary complexes. These experiments demonstrate that the efficiency of formation of the ternary complexes depends on the individual components. Moreover, selective exchange of the components is possible, leading to formation of the most favorable complex. Besides the obvious size effect, a charge‐transfer interaction may also contribute to this effect. Charge‐transfer bands are clearly observed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. A change in the oxidation potential of the encapsulated electron donor also leads to a shift in the charge‐transfer energy bands. As expected, metal complexes with a higher oxidation potential give rise to a higher charge‐transfer energy and a larger hypsochromic shift in the UV/Vis spectrum. These subtle energy differences may potentially be used to control the binding and reactivity of the complexes bound in a confined space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5096245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50962452016-11-09 Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage Leenders, Stefan H. A. M. Becker, René Kumpulainen, Tatu de Bruin, Bas Sawada, Tomohisa Kato, Taito Fujita, Makoto Reek, Joost N. H. Chemistry Full Papers There is broad interest in molecular encapsulation as such systems can be utilized to stabilize guests, facilitate reactions inside a cavity, or give rise to energy‐transfer processes in a confined space. Detailed understanding of encapsulation events is required to facilitate functional molecular encapsulation. In this contribution, it is demonstrated that Ir and Rh‐Cp‐type metal complexes can be encapsulated inside a self‐assembled M(6)L(4) metallocage only in the presence of an aromatic compound as a second guest. The individual guests are not encapsulated, suggesting that only the pair of guests can fill the void of the cage. Hence, selective co‐encapsulation is observed. This principle is demonstrated by co‐encapsulation of a variety of combinations of metal complexes and aromatic guests, leading to several ternary complexes. These experiments demonstrate that the efficiency of formation of the ternary complexes depends on the individual components. Moreover, selective exchange of the components is possible, leading to formation of the most favorable complex. Besides the obvious size effect, a charge‐transfer interaction may also contribute to this effect. Charge‐transfer bands are clearly observed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. A change in the oxidation potential of the encapsulated electron donor also leads to a shift in the charge‐transfer energy bands. As expected, metal complexes with a higher oxidation potential give rise to a higher charge‐transfer energy and a larger hypsochromic shift in the UV/Vis spectrum. These subtle energy differences may potentially be used to control the binding and reactivity of the complexes bound in a confined space. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-14 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5096245/ /pubmed/27624751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Leenders, Stefan H. A. M.
Becker, René
Kumpulainen, Tatu
de Bruin, Bas
Sawada, Tomohisa
Kato, Taito
Fujita, Makoto
Reek, Joost N. H.
Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title_full Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title_fullStr Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title_full_unstemmed Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title_short Selective Co‐Encapsulation Inside an M(6)L(4) Cage
title_sort selective co‐encapsulation inside an m(6)l(4) cage
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603017
work_keys_str_mv AT leendersstefanham selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT beckerrene selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT kumpulainentatu selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT debruinbas selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT sawadatomohisa selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT katotaito selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT fujitamakoto selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage
AT reekjoostnh selectivecoencapsulationinsideanm6l4cage