Cargando…
Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials (CT) represent an important treatment option for cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients face challenges to enrolling in CTs, such as logistical barriers, poor CT understanding and complex clinical regimens. Patient navigation is a strategy that may help to improve the d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.005 |
_version_ | 1782465473209696256 |
---|---|
author | Cartmell, Kathleen B. Bonilha, Heather S. Matson, Terri Bryant, Debbie C. Zapka, Jane Bentz, Tricia A. Ford, Marvella E. Hughes-Halbert, Chanita Simpson, Kit N. Alberg, Anthony J. |
author_facet | Cartmell, Kathleen B. Bonilha, Heather S. Matson, Terri Bryant, Debbie C. Zapka, Jane Bentz, Tricia A. Ford, Marvella E. Hughes-Halbert, Chanita Simpson, Kit N. Alberg, Anthony J. |
author_sort | Cartmell, Kathleen B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical trials (CT) represent an important treatment option for cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients face challenges to enrolling in CTs, such as logistical barriers, poor CT understanding and complex clinical regimens. Patient navigation is a strategy that may help to improve the delivery of CT education and support services. We examined the feasibility and initial effect of one navigation strategy, use of lay navigators. METHODS: A lay CT navigation intervention was evaluated in a prospective cohort study among 40 lung and esophageal cancer patients. The intervention was delivered by a trained lay navigator who viewed a 17-min CT educational video with each patient, assessed and answered their questions about CT participation and addressed reported barriers to care and trial participation. RESULTS: During this 12-month pilot project, 85% (95% CI: 72%–93%) of patients eligible for a therapeutic CT consented to participate in the CT navigation intervention. Among navigated patients, CT understanding improved between pre- and post-test (means 3.54 and 4.40, respectively; p-value 0.004), and 95% (95% CI: 82%–98%) of navigated patients consented to participate in a CT. Navigated patients reported being satisfied with patient navigation services and CT participation. CONCLUSIONS: In this formative single-arm pilot project, initial evidence was found for the potential effect of a lay navigation intervention on CT understanding and enrollment. A randomized controlled trial is needed to examine the efficacy of the intervention for improving CT education and enrollment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5096459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50964592017-08-15 Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation Cartmell, Kathleen B. Bonilha, Heather S. Matson, Terri Bryant, Debbie C. Zapka, Jane Bentz, Tricia A. Ford, Marvella E. Hughes-Halbert, Chanita Simpson, Kit N. Alberg, Anthony J. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND: Clinical trials (CT) represent an important treatment option for cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients face challenges to enrolling in CTs, such as logistical barriers, poor CT understanding and complex clinical regimens. Patient navigation is a strategy that may help to improve the delivery of CT education and support services. We examined the feasibility and initial effect of one navigation strategy, use of lay navigators. METHODS: A lay CT navigation intervention was evaluated in a prospective cohort study among 40 lung and esophageal cancer patients. The intervention was delivered by a trained lay navigator who viewed a 17-min CT educational video with each patient, assessed and answered their questions about CT participation and addressed reported barriers to care and trial participation. RESULTS: During this 12-month pilot project, 85% (95% CI: 72%–93%) of patients eligible for a therapeutic CT consented to participate in the CT navigation intervention. Among navigated patients, CT understanding improved between pre- and post-test (means 3.54 and 4.40, respectively; p-value 0.004), and 95% (95% CI: 82%–98%) of navigated patients consented to participate in a CT. Navigated patients reported being satisfied with patient navigation services and CT participation. CONCLUSIONS: In this formative single-arm pilot project, initial evidence was found for the potential effect of a lay navigation intervention on CT understanding and enrollment. A randomized controlled trial is needed to examine the efficacy of the intervention for improving CT education and enrollment. Elsevier 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5096459/ /pubmed/27822566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.005 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cartmell, Kathleen B. Bonilha, Heather S. Matson, Terri Bryant, Debbie C. Zapka, Jane Bentz, Tricia A. Ford, Marvella E. Hughes-Halbert, Chanita Simpson, Kit N. Alberg, Anthony J. Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title | Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title_full | Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title_fullStr | Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title_short | Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation |
title_sort | patient participation in cancer clinical trials: a pilot test of lay navigation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cartmellkathleenb patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT bonilhaheathers patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT matsonterri patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT bryantdebbiec patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT zapkajane patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT bentztriciaa patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT fordmarvellae patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT hugheshalbertchanita patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT simpsonkitn patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation AT alberganthonyj patientparticipationincancerclinicaltrialsapilottestoflaynavigation |