Cargando…

The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task

Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vuillier, Laura, Bryce, Donna, Szücs, Denes, Whitebread, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697
_version_ 1782465508467015680
author Vuillier, Laura
Bryce, Donna
Szücs, Denes
Whitebread, David
author_facet Vuillier, Laura
Bryce, Donna
Szücs, Denes
Whitebread, David
author_sort Vuillier, Laura
collection PubMed
description Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or clustered in childhood is under debate. In this study, we investigated the existence and development of two hypothesized component processes of inhibitory control–interference suppression and response inhibition–using a single task and event related potential components. Twenty 8-year-old children and seventeen adults performed a spatially cued Go/Nogo task while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Mean N2 amplitudes confirmed the expected pattern for response inhibition with both the children and the adults showing more negative N2 for Nogo vs. Go trials. The interference suppression N2 effect was only present in adults and appeared as a more negative N2 in response to Go trials with a congruent cue than Go trials with an incongruent cue. Contrary to previous findings, there was no evidence that the interference suppression N2 effect was later occurring than the response inhibition N2 effect. Overall, response inhibition was present in both the children and the adults whereas interference suppression was only present in the adults. These results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes for both component processes of inhibitory control, with interference suppression probably continuing to develop into late childhood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5096696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50966962016-11-18 The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task Vuillier, Laura Bryce, Donna Szücs, Denes Whitebread, David PLoS One Research Article Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or clustered in childhood is under debate. In this study, we investigated the existence and development of two hypothesized component processes of inhibitory control–interference suppression and response inhibition–using a single task and event related potential components. Twenty 8-year-old children and seventeen adults performed a spatially cued Go/Nogo task while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Mean N2 amplitudes confirmed the expected pattern for response inhibition with both the children and the adults showing more negative N2 for Nogo vs. Go trials. The interference suppression N2 effect was only present in adults and appeared as a more negative N2 in response to Go trials with a congruent cue than Go trials with an incongruent cue. Contrary to previous findings, there was no evidence that the interference suppression N2 effect was later occurring than the response inhibition N2 effect. Overall, response inhibition was present in both the children and the adults whereas interference suppression was only present in the adults. These results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes for both component processes of inhibitory control, with interference suppression probably continuing to develop into late childhood. Public Library of Science 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5096696/ /pubmed/27814356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697 Text en © 2016 Vuillier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vuillier, Laura
Bryce, Donna
Szücs, Denes
Whitebread, David
The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title_full The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title_fullStr The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title_full_unstemmed The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title_short The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
title_sort maturation of interference suppression and response inhibition: erp analysis of a cued go/nogo task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697
work_keys_str_mv AT vuillierlaura thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT brycedonna thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT szucsdenes thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT whitebreaddavid thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT vuillierlaura maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT brycedonna maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT szucsdenes maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask
AT whitebreaddavid maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask