Cargando…
The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task
Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697 |
_version_ | 1782465508467015680 |
---|---|
author | Vuillier, Laura Bryce, Donna Szücs, Denes Whitebread, David |
author_facet | Vuillier, Laura Bryce, Donna Szücs, Denes Whitebread, David |
author_sort | Vuillier, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or clustered in childhood is under debate. In this study, we investigated the existence and development of two hypothesized component processes of inhibitory control–interference suppression and response inhibition–using a single task and event related potential components. Twenty 8-year-old children and seventeen adults performed a spatially cued Go/Nogo task while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Mean N2 amplitudes confirmed the expected pattern for response inhibition with both the children and the adults showing more negative N2 for Nogo vs. Go trials. The interference suppression N2 effect was only present in adults and appeared as a more negative N2 in response to Go trials with a congruent cue than Go trials with an incongruent cue. Contrary to previous findings, there was no evidence that the interference suppression N2 effect was later occurring than the response inhibition N2 effect. Overall, response inhibition was present in both the children and the adults whereas interference suppression was only present in the adults. These results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes for both component processes of inhibitory control, with interference suppression probably continuing to develop into late childhood. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5096696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50966962016-11-18 The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task Vuillier, Laura Bryce, Donna Szücs, Denes Whitebread, David PLoS One Research Article Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or clustered in childhood is under debate. In this study, we investigated the existence and development of two hypothesized component processes of inhibitory control–interference suppression and response inhibition–using a single task and event related potential components. Twenty 8-year-old children and seventeen adults performed a spatially cued Go/Nogo task while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Mean N2 amplitudes confirmed the expected pattern for response inhibition with both the children and the adults showing more negative N2 for Nogo vs. Go trials. The interference suppression N2 effect was only present in adults and appeared as a more negative N2 in response to Go trials with a congruent cue than Go trials with an incongruent cue. Contrary to previous findings, there was no evidence that the interference suppression N2 effect was later occurring than the response inhibition N2 effect. Overall, response inhibition was present in both the children and the adults whereas interference suppression was only present in the adults. These results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes for both component processes of inhibitory control, with interference suppression probably continuing to develop into late childhood. Public Library of Science 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5096696/ /pubmed/27814356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697 Text en © 2016 Vuillier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vuillier, Laura Bryce, Donna Szücs, Denes Whitebread, David The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title | The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title_full | The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title_fullStr | The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title_full_unstemmed | The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title_short | The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task |
title_sort | maturation of interference suppression and response inhibition: erp analysis of a cued go/nogo task |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vuillierlaura thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT brycedonna thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT szucsdenes thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT whitebreaddavid thematurationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT vuillierlaura maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT brycedonna maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT szucsdenes maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask AT whitebreaddavid maturationofinterferencesuppressionandresponseinhibitionerpanalysisofacuedgonogotask |