Cargando…
Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826194 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110 |
_version_ | 1782465526129229824 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Liang-Jen Lin, Pao-Yen Lee, Yu Huang, Yu-Chi Hsu, Su-Ting Hung, Chi-Fa Chen, Chih-Ken Chen, Yi-Chih Wang, Ya-Ling Tsai, Ming-Che |
author_facet | Wang, Liang-Jen Lin, Pao-Yen Lee, Yu Huang, Yu-Chi Hsu, Su-Ting Hung, Chi-Fa Chen, Chih-Ken Chen, Yi-Chih Wang, Ya-Ling Tsai, Ming-Che |
author_sort | Wang, Liang-Jen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BACS in a Chinese-speaking population. METHODS: All participants in this study (66 patients with schizophrenia [mean age: 41.2 years, 57.6% male] and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were from Taiwan and assessed using the BACS and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B). Thirty-eight of the 66 patients with schizophrenia received a reassessment using the BACS. RESULTS: The BACS had good test–retest reliability, and all BACS subtests had statistically insignificant practice effects. Principal components analysis demonstrated that a one-factor solution best fits our dataset (60.9% of the variance). In both patients and controls, the BACS composite scores were positively correlated with all BACS subscales (P<0.001) and UPSA-B scales (P<0.001). Furthermore, all BACS subtests (verbal memory, working memory, motor speed, verbal fluency, attention and processing speed, and executive function) significantly differentiated patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls (P<0.001), and the BACS composite score had the best discriminative validity (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the BACS exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, high internal consistency, acceptable concurrent validity, and good discriminant validity. We suggest that the BACS is a reliable and practical tool for assessing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5096784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50967842016-11-08 Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Wang, Liang-Jen Lin, Pao-Yen Lee, Yu Huang, Yu-Chi Hsu, Su-Ting Hung, Chi-Fa Chen, Chih-Ken Chen, Yi-Chih Wang, Ya-Ling Tsai, Ming-Che Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BACS in a Chinese-speaking population. METHODS: All participants in this study (66 patients with schizophrenia [mean age: 41.2 years, 57.6% male] and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were from Taiwan and assessed using the BACS and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B). Thirty-eight of the 66 patients with schizophrenia received a reassessment using the BACS. RESULTS: The BACS had good test–retest reliability, and all BACS subtests had statistically insignificant practice effects. Principal components analysis demonstrated that a one-factor solution best fits our dataset (60.9% of the variance). In both patients and controls, the BACS composite scores were positively correlated with all BACS subscales (P<0.001) and UPSA-B scales (P<0.001). Furthermore, all BACS subtests (verbal memory, working memory, motor speed, verbal fluency, attention and processing speed, and executive function) significantly differentiated patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls (P<0.001), and the BACS composite score had the best discriminative validity (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the BACS exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, high internal consistency, acceptable concurrent validity, and good discriminant validity. We suggest that the BACS is a reliable and practical tool for assessing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5096784/ /pubmed/27826194 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110 Text en © 2016 Wang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Liang-Jen Lin, Pao-Yen Lee, Yu Huang, Yu-Chi Hsu, Su-Ting Hung, Chi-Fa Chen, Chih-Ken Chen, Yi-Chih Wang, Ya-Ling Tsai, Ming-Che Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title | Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title_full | Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title_short | Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia |
title_sort | validation of the chinese version of brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826194 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangliangjen validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT linpaoyen validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT leeyu validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT huangyuchi validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT hsusuting validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT hungchifa validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT chenchihken validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT chenyichih validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT wangyaling validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia AT tsaimingche validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia |