Cargando…

Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liang-Jen, Lin, Pao-Yen, Lee, Yu, Huang, Yu-Chi, Hsu, Su-Ting, Hung, Chi-Fa, Chen, Chih-Ken, Chen, Yi-Chih, Wang, Ya-Ling, Tsai, Ming-Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826194
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110
_version_ 1782465526129229824
author Wang, Liang-Jen
Lin, Pao-Yen
Lee, Yu
Huang, Yu-Chi
Hsu, Su-Ting
Hung, Chi-Fa
Chen, Chih-Ken
Chen, Yi-Chih
Wang, Ya-Ling
Tsai, Ming-Che
author_facet Wang, Liang-Jen
Lin, Pao-Yen
Lee, Yu
Huang, Yu-Chi
Hsu, Su-Ting
Hung, Chi-Fa
Chen, Chih-Ken
Chen, Yi-Chih
Wang, Ya-Ling
Tsai, Ming-Che
author_sort Wang, Liang-Jen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BACS in a Chinese-speaking population. METHODS: All participants in this study (66 patients with schizophrenia [mean age: 41.2 years, 57.6% male] and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were from Taiwan and assessed using the BACS and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B). Thirty-eight of the 66 patients with schizophrenia received a reassessment using the BACS. RESULTS: The BACS had good test–retest reliability, and all BACS subtests had statistically insignificant practice effects. Principal components analysis demonstrated that a one-factor solution best fits our dataset (60.9% of the variance). In both patients and controls, the BACS composite scores were positively correlated with all BACS subscales (P<0.001) and UPSA-B scales (P<0.001). Furthermore, all BACS subtests (verbal memory, working memory, motor speed, verbal fluency, attention and processing speed, and executive function) significantly differentiated patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls (P<0.001), and the BACS composite score had the best discriminative validity (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the BACS exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, high internal consistency, acceptable concurrent validity, and good discriminant validity. We suggest that the BACS is a reliable and practical tool for assessing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5096784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50967842016-11-08 Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Wang, Liang-Jen Lin, Pao-Yen Lee, Yu Huang, Yu-Chi Hsu, Su-Ting Hung, Chi-Fa Chen, Chih-Ken Chen, Yi-Chih Wang, Ya-Ling Tsai, Ming-Che Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research OBJECTIVE: A test battery that measures cognitive function impairment in patients with schizophrenia, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), has been translated into various languages and validated. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BACS in a Chinese-speaking population. METHODS: All participants in this study (66 patients with schizophrenia [mean age: 41.2 years, 57.6% male] and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were from Taiwan and assessed using the BACS and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B). Thirty-eight of the 66 patients with schizophrenia received a reassessment using the BACS. RESULTS: The BACS had good test–retest reliability, and all BACS subtests had statistically insignificant practice effects. Principal components analysis demonstrated that a one-factor solution best fits our dataset (60.9% of the variance). In both patients and controls, the BACS composite scores were positively correlated with all BACS subscales (P<0.001) and UPSA-B scales (P<0.001). Furthermore, all BACS subtests (verbal memory, working memory, motor speed, verbal fluency, attention and processing speed, and executive function) significantly differentiated patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls (P<0.001), and the BACS composite score had the best discriminative validity (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the BACS exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, high internal consistency, acceptable concurrent validity, and good discriminant validity. We suggest that the BACS is a reliable and practical tool for assessing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5096784/ /pubmed/27826194 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110 Text en © 2016 Wang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Liang-Jen
Lin, Pao-Yen
Lee, Yu
Huang, Yu-Chi
Hsu, Su-Ting
Hung, Chi-Fa
Chen, Chih-Ken
Chen, Yi-Chih
Wang, Ya-Ling
Tsai, Ming-Che
Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title_full Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title_fullStr Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title_short Validation of the Chinese version of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia
title_sort validation of the chinese version of brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5096784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826194
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S118110
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliangjen validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT linpaoyen validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT leeyu validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT huangyuchi validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT hsusuting validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT hungchifa validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT chenchihken validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT chenyichih validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT wangyaling validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia
AT tsaimingche validationofthechineseversionofbriefassessmentofcognitioninschizophrenia