Cargando…

Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beaulieu, Kristine, Hopkins, Mark, Blundell, John, Finlayson, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9
_version_ 1782465545217507328
author Beaulieu, Kristine
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John
Finlayson, Graham
author_facet Beaulieu, Kristine
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John
Finlayson, Graham
author_sort Beaulieu, Kristine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of physical activity. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2015, using keywords pertaining to physical activity, appetite, food intake and appetite-related peptides. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they involved healthy non-smoking adults (aged 18–64 years) participating in cross-sectional studies examining appetite control in active and inactive individuals; or before and after exercise training in previously inactive individuals. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Of 77 full-text articles assessed, 28 studies (14 cross-sectional; 14 exercise training) met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Appetite sensations and absolute energy intake did not differ consistently across studies. Active individuals had a greater ability to compensate for high-energy preloads through reductions in energy intake, in comparison with inactive controls. When physical activity level was graded across cross-sectional studies (low, medium, high, very high), a significant curvilinear effect on energy intake (z-scores) was observed. LIMITATIONS: Methodological issues existed concerning the small number of studies, lack of objective quantification of food intake, and various definitions used to define active and inactive individuals. CONCLUSION: Habitually active individuals showed improved compensation for the energy density of foods, but no consistent differences in appetite or absolute energy intake, in comparison with inactive individuals. This review supports a J-shaped relationship between physical activity level and energy intake. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019696 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5097075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50970752016-11-21 Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review Beaulieu, Kristine Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John Finlayson, Graham Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of physical activity. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2015, using keywords pertaining to physical activity, appetite, food intake and appetite-related peptides. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they involved healthy non-smoking adults (aged 18–64 years) participating in cross-sectional studies examining appetite control in active and inactive individuals; or before and after exercise training in previously inactive individuals. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Of 77 full-text articles assessed, 28 studies (14 cross-sectional; 14 exercise training) met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Appetite sensations and absolute energy intake did not differ consistently across studies. Active individuals had a greater ability to compensate for high-energy preloads through reductions in energy intake, in comparison with inactive controls. When physical activity level was graded across cross-sectional studies (low, medium, high, very high), a significant curvilinear effect on energy intake (z-scores) was observed. LIMITATIONS: Methodological issues existed concerning the small number of studies, lack of objective quantification of food intake, and various definitions used to define active and inactive individuals. CONCLUSION: Habitually active individuals showed improved compensation for the energy density of foods, but no consistent differences in appetite or absolute energy intake, in comparison with inactive individuals. This review supports a J-shaped relationship between physical activity level and energy intake. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019696 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5097075/ /pubmed/27002623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Beaulieu, Kristine
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John
Finlayson, Graham
Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title_full Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title_short Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
title_sort does habitual physical activity increase the sensitivity of the appetite control system? a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9
work_keys_str_mv AT beaulieukristine doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview
AT hopkinsmark doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview
AT blundelljohn doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview
AT finlaysongraham doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview