Cargando…
Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9 |
_version_ | 1782465545217507328 |
---|---|
author | Beaulieu, Kristine Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John Finlayson, Graham |
author_facet | Beaulieu, Kristine Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John Finlayson, Graham |
author_sort | Beaulieu, Kristine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of physical activity. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2015, using keywords pertaining to physical activity, appetite, food intake and appetite-related peptides. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they involved healthy non-smoking adults (aged 18–64 years) participating in cross-sectional studies examining appetite control in active and inactive individuals; or before and after exercise training in previously inactive individuals. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Of 77 full-text articles assessed, 28 studies (14 cross-sectional; 14 exercise training) met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Appetite sensations and absolute energy intake did not differ consistently across studies. Active individuals had a greater ability to compensate for high-energy preloads through reductions in energy intake, in comparison with inactive controls. When physical activity level was graded across cross-sectional studies (low, medium, high, very high), a significant curvilinear effect on energy intake (z-scores) was observed. LIMITATIONS: Methodological issues existed concerning the small number of studies, lack of objective quantification of food intake, and various definitions used to define active and inactive individuals. CONCLUSION: Habitually active individuals showed improved compensation for the energy density of foods, but no consistent differences in appetite or absolute energy intake, in comparison with inactive individuals. This review supports a J-shaped relationship between physical activity level and energy intake. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019696 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5097075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50970752016-11-21 Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review Beaulieu, Kristine Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John Finlayson, Graham Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that habitual physical activity improves appetite control; however, the evidence has never been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether appetite control (e.g. subjective appetite, appetite-related peptides, food intake) differs according to levels of physical activity. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2015, using keywords pertaining to physical activity, appetite, food intake and appetite-related peptides. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they involved healthy non-smoking adults (aged 18–64 years) participating in cross-sectional studies examining appetite control in active and inactive individuals; or before and after exercise training in previously inactive individuals. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Of 77 full-text articles assessed, 28 studies (14 cross-sectional; 14 exercise training) met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Appetite sensations and absolute energy intake did not differ consistently across studies. Active individuals had a greater ability to compensate for high-energy preloads through reductions in energy intake, in comparison with inactive controls. When physical activity level was graded across cross-sectional studies (low, medium, high, very high), a significant curvilinear effect on energy intake (z-scores) was observed. LIMITATIONS: Methodological issues existed concerning the small number of studies, lack of objective quantification of food intake, and various definitions used to define active and inactive individuals. CONCLUSION: Habitually active individuals showed improved compensation for the energy density of foods, but no consistent differences in appetite or absolute energy intake, in comparison with inactive individuals. This review supports a J-shaped relationship between physical activity level and energy intake. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019696 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5097075/ /pubmed/27002623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Beaulieu, Kristine Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John Finlayson, Graham Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title | Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Does Habitual Physical Activity Increase the Sensitivity of the Appetite Control System? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | does habitual physical activity increase the sensitivity of the appetite control system? a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0518-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaulieukristine doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview AT hopkinsmark doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview AT blundelljohn doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview AT finlaysongraham doeshabitualphysicalactivityincreasethesensitivityoftheappetitecontrolsystemasystematicreview |