Cargando…
Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk
BACKGROUND: Multiplexing multiple samples during Illumina sequencing is a common practice and is rapidly growing in importance as the throughput of the platform increases. Misassignments during de-multiplexing, where sequences are associated with the wrong sample, are an overlooked error mode on the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x |
_version_ | 1782465583159181312 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Erik Scott Vetsigian, Kalin Horen |
author_facet | Wright, Erik Scott Vetsigian, Kalin Horen |
author_sort | Wright, Erik Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiplexing multiple samples during Illumina sequencing is a common practice and is rapidly growing in importance as the throughput of the platform increases. Misassignments during de-multiplexing, where sequences are associated with the wrong sample, are an overlooked error mode on the Illumina sequencing platform. This results in a low rate of cross-talk among multiplexed samples and can cause detrimental effects in studies requiring the detection of rare variants or when multiplexing a large number of samples. RESULTS: We observed rates of cross-talk averaging 0.24 % when multiplexing 14 different samples with unique i5 and i7 index sequences. This cross-talk rate corresponded to 254,632 misassigned reads on a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Notably, all types of misassignment occur at similar rates: incorrect i5, incorrect i7, and incorrect sequence reads. We demonstrate that misassignments can be nearly eliminated by quality filtering of index reads while preserving about 90 % of the original sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-talk among multiplexed samples is a significant error mode on the Illumina platform, especially if samples are only separated by a single unique index. Quality filtering of index sequences offers an effective solution to minimizing cross-talk among samples. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward method for verifying the extent of cross-talk between samples and optimizing quality score thresholds that does not require additional control samples and can even be performed post hoc on previous runs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5097354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50973542016-11-07 Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk Wright, Erik Scott Vetsigian, Kalin Horen BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Multiplexing multiple samples during Illumina sequencing is a common practice and is rapidly growing in importance as the throughput of the platform increases. Misassignments during de-multiplexing, where sequences are associated with the wrong sample, are an overlooked error mode on the Illumina sequencing platform. This results in a low rate of cross-talk among multiplexed samples and can cause detrimental effects in studies requiring the detection of rare variants or when multiplexing a large number of samples. RESULTS: We observed rates of cross-talk averaging 0.24 % when multiplexing 14 different samples with unique i5 and i7 index sequences. This cross-talk rate corresponded to 254,632 misassigned reads on a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Notably, all types of misassignment occur at similar rates: incorrect i5, incorrect i7, and incorrect sequence reads. We demonstrate that misassignments can be nearly eliminated by quality filtering of index reads while preserving about 90 % of the original sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-talk among multiplexed samples is a significant error mode on the Illumina platform, especially if samples are only separated by a single unique index. Quality filtering of index sequences offers an effective solution to minimizing cross-talk among samples. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward method for verifying the extent of cross-talk between samples and optimizing quality score thresholds that does not require additional control samples and can even be performed post hoc on previous runs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5097354/ /pubmed/27814679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Wright, Erik Scott Vetsigian, Kalin Horen Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title | Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title_full | Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title_fullStr | Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title_short | Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
title_sort | quality filtering of illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrighterikscott qualityfilteringofilluminaindexreadsmitigatessamplecrosstalk AT vetsigiankalinhoren qualityfilteringofilluminaindexreadsmitigatessamplecrosstalk |