Cargando…
Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals
BACKGROUND: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation framework, a National Institutes of Health-sponsored study compared the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention to usual care. A prior paper describes the effectiveness of the To...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6 |
_version_ | 1782465596250652672 |
---|---|
author | Duffy, Sonia A. Ronis, David L. Ewing, Lee A. Waltje, Andrea H. Hall, Stephanie V. Thomas, Patricia L. Olree, Christine M. Maguire, Kimberly A. Friedman, Lisa Klotz, Sue Jordan, Neil Landstrom, Gay L. |
author_facet | Duffy, Sonia A. Ronis, David L. Ewing, Lee A. Waltje, Andrea H. Hall, Stephanie V. Thomas, Patricia L. Olree, Christine M. Maguire, Kimberly A. Friedman, Lisa Klotz, Sue Jordan, Neil Landstrom, Gay L. |
author_sort | Duffy, Sonia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation framework, a National Institutes of Health-sponsored study compared the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention to usual care. A prior paper describes the effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics intervention. This subsequent paper provides data describing the remaining constructs of the RE-AIM framework. METHODS: This pragmatic study used a mixed methods, quasi-experimental design in five Michigan community hospitals of which three received the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention and two received usual care. Nurses and patients were surveyed pre- and post-intervention. Measures included reach (patient participation rates, characteristics, and receipt of services), adoption (nurse participation rates and characteristics), implementation (pre-to post-training changes in nurses' attitudes, delivery of services, barriers to implementation, opinions about training, documentation of services, and numbers of volunteer follow-up phone calls), and maintenance (continuation of the intervention once the study ended). RESULTS: Reach: Patient participation rates were 71.5 %. Compared to no change in the control sites, there were significant pre- to post-intervention increases in self-reported receipt of print materials in the intervention hospitals (n = 1370, p < 0.001). Adoption: In the intervention hospitals, all targeted units and several non-targeted units participated; 76.0 % (n = 1028) of targeted nurses and 317 additional staff participated in the training, and 92.4 % were extremely or somewhat satisfied with the training. Implementation: Nurses in the intervention hospitals reported increases in providing advice to quit, counseling, medications, handouts, and DVD (all p < 0.05) and reported decreased barriers to implementing smoking cessation services (p < 0.001). Qualitative comments were very positive (“user friendly,” “streamlined,” or “saves time”), although problems with showing patients the DVD and charting in the electronic medical record were noted. Maintenance: Nurses continued to provide the intervention after the study ended. CONCLUSIONS: Given that nurses represent the largest group of front-line providers, this intervention, which meets Joint Commission guidelines for treating inpatient smokers, has the potential to have a wide reach and to decrease smoking, morbidity, and mortality among inpatient smokers. As we move toward more population-based interventions, the RE-AIM framework is a valuable guide for implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01309217 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5097410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50974102016-11-08 Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals Duffy, Sonia A. Ronis, David L. Ewing, Lee A. Waltje, Andrea H. Hall, Stephanie V. Thomas, Patricia L. Olree, Christine M. Maguire, Kimberly A. Friedman, Lisa Klotz, Sue Jordan, Neil Landstrom, Gay L. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation framework, a National Institutes of Health-sponsored study compared the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention to usual care. A prior paper describes the effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics intervention. This subsequent paper provides data describing the remaining constructs of the RE-AIM framework. METHODS: This pragmatic study used a mixed methods, quasi-experimental design in five Michigan community hospitals of which three received the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention and two received usual care. Nurses and patients were surveyed pre- and post-intervention. Measures included reach (patient participation rates, characteristics, and receipt of services), adoption (nurse participation rates and characteristics), implementation (pre-to post-training changes in nurses' attitudes, delivery of services, barriers to implementation, opinions about training, documentation of services, and numbers of volunteer follow-up phone calls), and maintenance (continuation of the intervention once the study ended). RESULTS: Reach: Patient participation rates were 71.5 %. Compared to no change in the control sites, there were significant pre- to post-intervention increases in self-reported receipt of print materials in the intervention hospitals (n = 1370, p < 0.001). Adoption: In the intervention hospitals, all targeted units and several non-targeted units participated; 76.0 % (n = 1028) of targeted nurses and 317 additional staff participated in the training, and 92.4 % were extremely or somewhat satisfied with the training. Implementation: Nurses in the intervention hospitals reported increases in providing advice to quit, counseling, medications, handouts, and DVD (all p < 0.05) and reported decreased barriers to implementing smoking cessation services (p < 0.001). Qualitative comments were very positive (“user friendly,” “streamlined,” or “saves time”), although problems with showing patients the DVD and charting in the electronic medical record were noted. Maintenance: Nurses continued to provide the intervention after the study ended. CONCLUSIONS: Given that nurses represent the largest group of front-line providers, this intervention, which meets Joint Commission guidelines for treating inpatient smokers, has the potential to have a wide reach and to decrease smoking, morbidity, and mortality among inpatient smokers. As we move toward more population-based interventions, the RE-AIM framework is a valuable guide for implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01309217 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5097410/ /pubmed/27814722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Duffy, Sonia A. Ronis, David L. Ewing, Lee A. Waltje, Andrea H. Hall, Stephanie V. Thomas, Patricia L. Olree, Christine M. Maguire, Kimberly A. Friedman, Lisa Klotz, Sue Jordan, Neil Landstrom, Gay L. Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title | Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title_full | Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title_fullStr | Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title_short | Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals |
title_sort | implementation of the tobacco tactics intervention versus usual care in trinity health community hospitals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffysoniaa implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT ronisdavidl implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT ewingleea implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT waltjeandreah implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT hallstephaniev implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT thomaspatricial implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT olreechristinem implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT maguirekimberlya implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT friedmanlisa implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT klotzsue implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT jordanneil implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals AT landstromgayl implementationofthetobaccotacticsinterventionversususualcareintrinityhealthcommunityhospitals |