Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical studies on the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) have reported favorable results as an alternative to the conventional complete dentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed but no evidence is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo, Esfandiari, Shahrokh, Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0
_version_ 1782465600743800832
author Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo
Esfandiari, Shahrokh
Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
author_facet Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo
Esfandiari, Shahrokh
Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
author_sort Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical studies on the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) have reported favorable results as an alternative to the conventional complete dentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed but no evidence is available with respect to the cost-effectiveness of this treatment, which is particularly important to test whether the incremental cost associated with the implant treatment is justified facing the benefits from the intervention. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of single-implant mandibular overdentures. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized clinical trial will include edentulous individuals who meet eligibility criteria. Participants will be randomized into one of the treatment groups: a conventional complete denture group or a single-implant mandibular overdenture group. Direct costs related to therapies in both groups will be identified, measured and valuated for 1 year after treatment. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction with the dentures will be the primary outcome variables. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be estimated and graphically presented on cost-effectiveness planes. A Markov decision tree will be constructed to set out the consequences of the competing alternatives. Sensitivity analysis on the most important assumptions will be performed in order to assess the robustness of the model. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial-based cost-effectiveness study on single-implant mandibular overdentures. Specific challenges in designing the protocol are considered. The expected results are of high clinical relevance and may contribute to the decision-making process when choosing between different alternatives for the rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02710357, registered on 11 March 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5097429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50974292016-11-08 Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo Esfandiari, Shahrokh Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical studies on the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) have reported favorable results as an alternative to the conventional complete dentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed but no evidence is available with respect to the cost-effectiveness of this treatment, which is particularly important to test whether the incremental cost associated with the implant treatment is justified facing the benefits from the intervention. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of single-implant mandibular overdentures. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized clinical trial will include edentulous individuals who meet eligibility criteria. Participants will be randomized into one of the treatment groups: a conventional complete denture group or a single-implant mandibular overdenture group. Direct costs related to therapies in both groups will be identified, measured and valuated for 1 year after treatment. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction with the dentures will be the primary outcome variables. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be estimated and graphically presented on cost-effectiveness planes. A Markov decision tree will be constructed to set out the consequences of the competing alternatives. Sensitivity analysis on the most important assumptions will be performed in order to assess the robustness of the model. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial-based cost-effectiveness study on single-implant mandibular overdentures. Specific challenges in designing the protocol are considered. The expected results are of high clinical relevance and may contribute to the decision-making process when choosing between different alternatives for the rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02710357, registered on 11 March 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5097429/ /pubmed/27814749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nogueira, Túlio Eduardo
Esfandiari, Shahrokh
Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1646-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nogueiratulioeduardo costeffectivenessanalysisofthesingleimplantmandibularoverdentureversusconventionalcompletedenturestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT esfandiarishahrokh costeffectivenessanalysisofthesingleimplantmandibularoverdentureversusconventionalcompletedenturestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lelesclaudiorodrigues costeffectivenessanalysisofthesingleimplantmandibularoverdentureversusconventionalcompletedenturestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial