Cargando…

Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour

BACKGROUND: Malaria continues to be a serious public health problem particularly in Africa. Many people infected with malaria do not access effective treatment due to high price. At the same time many individuals receiving malaria drugs do not suffer from malaria because of the common practice of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Kristian Schultz, Lesner, Tine Hjernø, Østerdal, Lars Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1582-1
_version_ 1782465600978681856
author Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Lesner, Tine Hjernø
Østerdal, Lars Peter
author_facet Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Lesner, Tine Hjernø
Østerdal, Lars Peter
author_sort Hansen, Kristian Schultz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria continues to be a serious public health problem particularly in Africa. Many people infected with malaria do not access effective treatment due to high price. At the same time many individuals receiving malaria drugs do not suffer from malaria because of the common practice of presumptive diagnosis. A global subsidy on artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has recently been suggested to increase access to the most effective malaria treatment. METHODS: Following the recommendation by World Health Organization that parasitological testing should be performed before treatment and ACT prescribed to confirmed cases only, it is investigated in this paper if a subsidy on malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) should be incorporated. A model is developed consisting of a representative individual with fever suspected to be malaria, seeking care at a specialized drug shop where RDTs, ACT medicines, and cheap, less effective anti-malarials are sold. Assuming that the individual has certain beliefs of the accuracy of the RDT and the probability that the fever is malaria, the model predicts the diagnosis-treatment behaviour of the individual. Subsidies on RDTs and ACT are introduced to incentivize appropriate behaviour: choose an RDT before treatment and purchase ACT only if the test is positive. RESULTS: Solving the model numerically suggests that a combined subsidy on both RDT and ACT is cost minimizing and improves diagnosis-treatment behaviour of individuals. For certain beliefs, such as low trust in RDT accuracy and strong belief that a fever is malaria, subsidization is not sufficient to incentivize appropriate behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: A combined subsidy on both RDT and ACT rather than a single subsidy is likely required to improve diagnosis-treatment behaviour among individuals seeking care for malaria in the private sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1582-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5097430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50974302016-11-08 Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour Hansen, Kristian Schultz Lesner, Tine Hjernø Østerdal, Lars Peter Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria continues to be a serious public health problem particularly in Africa. Many people infected with malaria do not access effective treatment due to high price. At the same time many individuals receiving malaria drugs do not suffer from malaria because of the common practice of presumptive diagnosis. A global subsidy on artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has recently been suggested to increase access to the most effective malaria treatment. METHODS: Following the recommendation by World Health Organization that parasitological testing should be performed before treatment and ACT prescribed to confirmed cases only, it is investigated in this paper if a subsidy on malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) should be incorporated. A model is developed consisting of a representative individual with fever suspected to be malaria, seeking care at a specialized drug shop where RDTs, ACT medicines, and cheap, less effective anti-malarials are sold. Assuming that the individual has certain beliefs of the accuracy of the RDT and the probability that the fever is malaria, the model predicts the diagnosis-treatment behaviour of the individual. Subsidies on RDTs and ACT are introduced to incentivize appropriate behaviour: choose an RDT before treatment and purchase ACT only if the test is positive. RESULTS: Solving the model numerically suggests that a combined subsidy on both RDT and ACT is cost minimizing and improves diagnosis-treatment behaviour of individuals. For certain beliefs, such as low trust in RDT accuracy and strong belief that a fever is malaria, subsidization is not sufficient to incentivize appropriate behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: A combined subsidy on both RDT and ACT rather than a single subsidy is likely required to improve diagnosis-treatment behaviour among individuals seeking care for malaria in the private sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1582-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5097430/ /pubmed/27814767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1582-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Lesner, Tine Hjernø
Østerdal, Lars Peter
Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title_full Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title_fullStr Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title_short Optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
title_sort optimal price subsidies for appropriate malaria testing and treatment behaviour
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1582-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenkristianschultz optimalpricesubsidiesforappropriatemalariatestingandtreatmentbehaviour
AT lesnertinehjernø optimalpricesubsidiesforappropriatemalariatestingandtreatmentbehaviour
AT østerdallarspeter optimalpricesubsidiesforappropriatemalariatestingandtreatmentbehaviour