Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Office workers engage in high levels of sitting time. Effective, context-specific, and scalable strategies are needed to support widespread sitting reduction. This study aimed to evaluate organisational-support strategies alone or in combination with an activity tracker to reduce sitting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brakenridge, C. L., Fjeldsoe, B. S., Young, D. C., Winkler, E. A. H., Dunstan, D. W., Straker, L. M., Healy, G. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0441-3
_version_ 1782465601437958144
author Brakenridge, C. L.
Fjeldsoe, B. S.
Young, D. C.
Winkler, E. A. H.
Dunstan, D. W.
Straker, L. M.
Healy, G. N.
author_facet Brakenridge, C. L.
Fjeldsoe, B. S.
Young, D. C.
Winkler, E. A. H.
Dunstan, D. W.
Straker, L. M.
Healy, G. N.
author_sort Brakenridge, C. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Office workers engage in high levels of sitting time. Effective, context-specific, and scalable strategies are needed to support widespread sitting reduction. This study aimed to evaluate organisational-support strategies alone or in combination with an activity tracker to reduce sitting in office workers. METHODS: From one organisation, 153 desk-based office workers were cluster-randomised (by team) to organisational support only (e.g., manager support, emails; ‘Group ORG’, 9 teams, 87 participants), or organisational support plus LUMOback activity tracker (‘Group ORG + Tracker’, 9 teams, 66 participants). The waist-worn tracker provided real-time feedback and prompts on sitting and posture. ActivPAL3 monitors were used to ascertain primary outcomes (sitting time during work- and overall hours) and other activity outcomes: prolonged sitting time (≥30 min bouts), time between sitting bouts, standing time, stepping time, and number of steps. Health and work outcomes were assessed by questionnaire. Changes within each group (three- and 12 months) and differences between groups were analysed by linear mixed models. Missing data were multiply imputed. RESULTS: At baseline, participants (46 % women, 23–58 years) spent (mean ± SD) 74.3 ± 9.7 % of their workday sitting, 17.5 ± 8.3 % standing and 8.1 ± 2.7 % stepping. Significant (p < 0.05) reductions in sitting time (both work and overall) were observed within both groups, but only at 12 months. For secondary activity outcomes, Group ORG significantly improved in work prolonged sitting, time between sitting bouts and standing time, and overall prolonged sitting time (12 months), and in overall standing time (three- and 12 months); while Group ORG + Tracker, significantly improved in work prolonged sitting, standing, stepping and overall standing time (12 months). Adjusted for confounders, the only significant between-group differences were a greater stepping time and step count for Group ORG + Tracker relative to Group ORG (+20.6 min/16 h day, 95 % CI: 3.1, 38.1, p = 0.021; +846.5steps/16 h day, 95 % CI: 67.8, 1625.2, p = 0.033) at 12 months. Observed changes in health and work outcomes were small and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Organisational-support strategies with or without an activity tracker resulted in improvements in sitting, prolonged sitting and standing; adding a tracker enhanced stepping changes. Improvements were most evident at 12 months, suggesting the organisational-support strategies may have taken time to embed within the organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12614000252617. Registered 10 March 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0441-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5097432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50974322016-11-08 Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial Brakenridge, C. L. Fjeldsoe, B. S. Young, D. C. Winkler, E. A. H. Dunstan, D. W. Straker, L. M. Healy, G. N. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Office workers engage in high levels of sitting time. Effective, context-specific, and scalable strategies are needed to support widespread sitting reduction. This study aimed to evaluate organisational-support strategies alone or in combination with an activity tracker to reduce sitting in office workers. METHODS: From one organisation, 153 desk-based office workers were cluster-randomised (by team) to organisational support only (e.g., manager support, emails; ‘Group ORG’, 9 teams, 87 participants), or organisational support plus LUMOback activity tracker (‘Group ORG + Tracker’, 9 teams, 66 participants). The waist-worn tracker provided real-time feedback and prompts on sitting and posture. ActivPAL3 monitors were used to ascertain primary outcomes (sitting time during work- and overall hours) and other activity outcomes: prolonged sitting time (≥30 min bouts), time between sitting bouts, standing time, stepping time, and number of steps. Health and work outcomes were assessed by questionnaire. Changes within each group (three- and 12 months) and differences between groups were analysed by linear mixed models. Missing data were multiply imputed. RESULTS: At baseline, participants (46 % women, 23–58 years) spent (mean ± SD) 74.3 ± 9.7 % of their workday sitting, 17.5 ± 8.3 % standing and 8.1 ± 2.7 % stepping. Significant (p < 0.05) reductions in sitting time (both work and overall) were observed within both groups, but only at 12 months. For secondary activity outcomes, Group ORG significantly improved in work prolonged sitting, time between sitting bouts and standing time, and overall prolonged sitting time (12 months), and in overall standing time (three- and 12 months); while Group ORG + Tracker, significantly improved in work prolonged sitting, standing, stepping and overall standing time (12 months). Adjusted for confounders, the only significant between-group differences were a greater stepping time and step count for Group ORG + Tracker relative to Group ORG (+20.6 min/16 h day, 95 % CI: 3.1, 38.1, p = 0.021; +846.5steps/16 h day, 95 % CI: 67.8, 1625.2, p = 0.033) at 12 months. Observed changes in health and work outcomes were small and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Organisational-support strategies with or without an activity tracker resulted in improvements in sitting, prolonged sitting and standing; adding a tracker enhanced stepping changes. Improvements were most evident at 12 months, suggesting the organisational-support strategies may have taken time to embed within the organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12614000252617. Registered 10 March 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0441-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5097432/ /pubmed/27814738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0441-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brakenridge, C. L.
Fjeldsoe, B. S.
Young, D. C.
Winkler, E. A. H.
Dunstan, D. W.
Straker, L. M.
Healy, G. N.
Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27814738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0441-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brakenridgecl evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT fjeldsoebs evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT youngdc evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT winklereah evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT dunstandw evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT strakerlm evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT healygn evaluatingtheeffectivenessoforganisationallevelstrategieswithorwithoutanactivitytrackertoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeaclusterrandomisedtrial