Cargando…

Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction

Conversation therapies employing video for feedback and to facilitate outcome measurement are increasingly used with people with post-stroke aphasia and their conversation partners; however the evidence base for change in everyday interaction remains limited. We investigated the effect of Better Con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Best, Wendy, Maxim, Jane, Heilemann, Claudia, Beckley, Firle, Johnson, Fiona, Edwards, Susan I., Howard, David, Beeke, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872588
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562
_version_ 1782465682169921536
author Best, Wendy
Maxim, Jane
Heilemann, Claudia
Beckley, Firle
Johnson, Fiona
Edwards, Susan I.
Howard, David
Beeke, Suzanne
author_facet Best, Wendy
Maxim, Jane
Heilemann, Claudia
Beckley, Firle
Johnson, Fiona
Edwards, Susan I.
Howard, David
Beeke, Suzanne
author_sort Best, Wendy
collection PubMed
description Conversation therapies employing video for feedback and to facilitate outcome measurement are increasingly used with people with post-stroke aphasia and their conversation partners; however the evidence base for change in everyday interaction remains limited. We investigated the effect of Better Conversations with Aphasia (BCA), an intervention that is freely available online at https://extend.ucl.ac.uk/. Eight people with chronic agrammatic aphasia, and their regular conversation partners participated in the tailored 8 week program involving significant video feedback. We explored changes in: (i) conversation facilitators (such as multi-modal turns by people with aphasia); and (ii) conversation barriers (such as use of test questions by conversation partners). The outcome of intervention was evaluated directly by measuring change in video-recorded everyday conversations. The study employed a pre-post design with multiple 5 minute samples of conversation before and after intervention, scored by trained raters blind to the point of data collection. Group level analysis showed no significant increase in conversation facilitators. There was, however, a significant reduction in the number of conversation barriers. The case series data revealed variability in conversation behaviors across occasions for the same dyad and between different dyads. Specifically, post-intervention there was a significant increase in facilitator behaviors for two dyads, a decrease for one and no significant change for five dyads. There was a significant decrease in barrier behaviors for five dyads and no significant change for three dyads. The reduction in barrier behaviors was considerable; on average change from over eight to fewer than three barrier behaviors in 5 minutes of conversation. The pre-post design has the limitation of no comparison group. However, change occurs in targeted conversational behaviors and in people with chronic aphasia and their partners. The findings suggest change can occur after eight therapy sessions and have implications for clinical practice. A reduction in barrier behaviors may be easier to obtain, although the controlled case series results demonstrate a significant increase in conversation facilitators is also possible. The rehabilitation tool is available online and video technology was central to delivering intervention and evaluating change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5097900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50979002016-11-21 Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction Best, Wendy Maxim, Jane Heilemann, Claudia Beckley, Firle Johnson, Fiona Edwards, Susan I. Howard, David Beeke, Suzanne Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Conversation therapies employing video for feedback and to facilitate outcome measurement are increasingly used with people with post-stroke aphasia and their conversation partners; however the evidence base for change in everyday interaction remains limited. We investigated the effect of Better Conversations with Aphasia (BCA), an intervention that is freely available online at https://extend.ucl.ac.uk/. Eight people with chronic agrammatic aphasia, and their regular conversation partners participated in the tailored 8 week program involving significant video feedback. We explored changes in: (i) conversation facilitators (such as multi-modal turns by people with aphasia); and (ii) conversation barriers (such as use of test questions by conversation partners). The outcome of intervention was evaluated directly by measuring change in video-recorded everyday conversations. The study employed a pre-post design with multiple 5 minute samples of conversation before and after intervention, scored by trained raters blind to the point of data collection. Group level analysis showed no significant increase in conversation facilitators. There was, however, a significant reduction in the number of conversation barriers. The case series data revealed variability in conversation behaviors across occasions for the same dyad and between different dyads. Specifically, post-intervention there was a significant increase in facilitator behaviors for two dyads, a decrease for one and no significant change for five dyads. There was a significant decrease in barrier behaviors for five dyads and no significant change for three dyads. The reduction in barrier behaviors was considerable; on average change from over eight to fewer than three barrier behaviors in 5 minutes of conversation. The pre-post design has the limitation of no comparison group. However, change occurs in targeted conversational behaviors and in people with chronic aphasia and their partners. The findings suggest change can occur after eight therapy sessions and have implications for clinical practice. A reduction in barrier behaviors may be easier to obtain, although the controlled case series results demonstrate a significant increase in conversation facilitators is also possible. The rehabilitation tool is available online and video technology was central to delivering intervention and evaluating change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5097900/ /pubmed/27872588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562 Text en Copyright © 2016 Best, Maxim, Heilemann, Beckley, Johnson, Edwards, Howard and Beeke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Best, Wendy
Maxim, Jane
Heilemann, Claudia
Beckley, Firle
Johnson, Fiona
Edwards, Susan I.
Howard, David
Beeke, Suzanne
Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title_full Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title_fullStr Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title_short Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction
title_sort conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: a group and case series investigation of changes in interaction
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872588
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562
work_keys_str_mv AT bestwendy conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT maximjane conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT heilemannclaudia conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT beckleyfirle conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT johnsonfiona conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT edwardssusani conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT howarddavid conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction
AT beekesuzanne conversationtherapywithpeoplewithaphasiaandconversationpartnersusingvideofeedbackagroupandcaseseriesinvestigationofchangesininteraction